TSTP Solution File: SET960+1 by Enigma---0.5.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem  : SET960+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1

% Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 00:15:32 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 7.88s 2.40s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 7.88s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :    8
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   29 (   7 unt;   7 nHn;  25 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   67 (  35 equ;  38 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    9 (   9 usr;   3 con; 0-4 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   54 (  12 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_9,plain,
    ( in(X1,X2)
    | X2 != cartesian_product2(X3,X4)
    | X1 != unordered_pair(unordered_pair(X5,X6),singleton(X5))
    | ~ in(X6,X4)
    | ~ in(X5,X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-rgtmc5ex/input.p',i_0_9) ).

cnf(i_0_4,plain,
    ( X1 != empty_set
    | ~ in(X2,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-rgtmc5ex/input.p',i_0_4) ).

cnf(i_0_18,negated_conjecture,
    ( esk9_0 = empty_set
    | esk10_0 = empty_set
    | cartesian_product2(esk9_0,esk10_0) = empty_set ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-rgtmc5ex/input.p',i_0_18) ).

cnf(i_0_11,plain,
    ( in(esk3_4(X1,X2,X3,X4),X2)
    | X3 != cartesian_product2(X1,X2)
    | ~ in(X4,X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-rgtmc5ex/input.p',i_0_11) ).

cnf(i_0_3,plain,
    ( X1 = empty_set
    | in(esk1_1(X1),X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-rgtmc5ex/input.p',i_0_3) ).

cnf(i_0_12,plain,
    ( in(esk2_4(X1,X2,X3,X4),X1)
    | X3 != cartesian_product2(X1,X2)
    | ~ in(X4,X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-rgtmc5ex/input.p',i_0_12) ).

cnf(i_0_19,negated_conjecture,
    ( esk10_0 != empty_set
    | cartesian_product2(esk9_0,esk10_0) != empty_set ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-rgtmc5ex/input.p',i_0_19) ).

cnf(i_0_20,negated_conjecture,
    ( esk9_0 != empty_set
    | cartesian_product2(esk9_0,esk10_0) != empty_set ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-rgtmc5ex/input.p',i_0_20) ).

cnf(c_0_29,plain,
    ( in(X1,X2)
    | X2 != cartesian_product2(X3,X4)
    | X1 != unordered_pair(unordered_pair(X5,X6),singleton(X5))
    | ~ in(X6,X4)
    | ~ in(X5,X3) ),
    i_0_9 ).

cnf(c_0_30,plain,
    ( X1 != empty_set
    | ~ in(X2,X1) ),
    i_0_4 ).

cnf(c_0_31,plain,
    ( in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(X1,X2),singleton(X1)),cartesian_product2(X3,X4))
    | ~ in(X2,X4)
    | ~ in(X1,X3) ),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_29])]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,negated_conjecture,
    ( esk9_0 = empty_set
    | esk10_0 = empty_set
    | cartesian_product2(esk9_0,esk10_0) = empty_set ),
    i_0_18 ).

cnf(c_0_33,plain,
    ~ in(X1,empty_set),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_30]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,plain,
    ( in(esk3_4(X1,X2,X3,X4),X2)
    | X3 != cartesian_product2(X1,X2)
    | ~ in(X4,X3) ),
    i_0_11 ).

cnf(c_0_35,negated_conjecture,
    ( esk10_0 = empty_set
    | esk9_0 = empty_set
    | ~ in(X1,esk10_0)
    | ~ in(X2,esk9_0) ),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_32]),c_0_33]) ).

cnf(c_0_36,plain,
    ( X1 = empty_set
    | in(esk1_1(X1),X1) ),
    i_0_3 ).

cnf(c_0_37,plain,
    ( in(esk3_4(X1,X2,cartesian_product2(X1,X2),X3),X2)
    | ~ in(X3,cartesian_product2(X1,X2)) ),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_34]) ).

cnf(c_0_38,plain,
    ( in(esk2_4(X1,X2,X3,X4),X1)
    | X3 != cartesian_product2(X1,X2)
    | ~ in(X4,X3) ),
    i_0_12 ).

cnf(c_0_39,plain,
    ( esk9_0 = empty_set
    | esk10_0 = empty_set
    | ~ in(X1,esk9_0) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_35,c_0_36]) ).

cnf(c_0_40,plain,
    ~ in(X1,cartesian_product2(X2,empty_set)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_33,c_0_37]) ).

cnf(c_0_41,plain,
    ( in(esk2_4(X1,X2,cartesian_product2(X1,X2),X3),X1)
    | ~ in(X3,cartesian_product2(X1,X2)) ),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_38]) ).

cnf(c_0_42,negated_conjecture,
    ( esk10_0 != empty_set
    | cartesian_product2(esk9_0,esk10_0) != empty_set ),
    i_0_19 ).

cnf(c_0_43,plain,
    ( esk10_0 = empty_set
    | esk9_0 = empty_set ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_39,c_0_36]) ).

cnf(c_0_44,plain,
    cartesian_product2(X1,empty_set) = empty_set,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_40,c_0_36]) ).

cnf(c_0_45,plain,
    ~ in(X1,cartesian_product2(empty_set,X2)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_33,c_0_41]) ).

cnf(c_0_46,negated_conjecture,
    ( esk9_0 != empty_set
    | cartesian_product2(esk9_0,esk10_0) != empty_set ),
    i_0_20 ).

cnf(c_0_47,negated_conjecture,
    esk9_0 = empty_set,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_42,c_0_43]),c_0_44])]) ).

cnf(c_0_48,plain,
    cartesian_product2(empty_set,X1) = empty_set,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_45,c_0_36]) ).

cnf(c_0_49,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_46,c_0_47]),c_0_48]),c_0_47])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem  : SET960+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.12/0.13  % Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.12/0.34  % Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.34  % DateTime : Sun Jul 10 07:10:24 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.19/0.45  # ENIGMATIC: Selected complete mode:
% 7.88/2.40  # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule:
% 7.88/2.40  # No SInE strategy applied
% 7.88/2.40  # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 7.88/2.40  # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S05AN
% 7.88/2.40  # and selection function PSelectComplexExceptUniqMaxPosHorn.
% 7.88/2.40  #
% 7.88/2.40  # Preprocessing time       : 0.023 s
% 7.88/2.40  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 7.88/2.40  
% 7.88/2.40  # Proof found!
% 7.88/2.40  # SZS status Theorem
% 7.88/2.40  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 7.88/2.40  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 7.88/2.40  
% 7.88/2.40  # -------------------------------------------------
% 7.88/2.40  # User time                : 0.024 s
% 7.88/2.40  # System time              : 0.008 s
% 7.88/2.40  # Total time               : 0.032 s
% 7.88/2.40  # Maximum resident set size: 7120 pages
% 7.88/2.40  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------