TSTP Solution File: SET959+1 by ePrincess---1.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : ePrincess---1.0
% Problem : SET959+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : ePrincess-casc -timeout=%d %s
% Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 00:23:27 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 18.36s 5.29s
% Output : Proof 77.32s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : SET959+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v4.0.0.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : ePrincess-casc -timeout=%d %s
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Sun Jul 10 17:09:55 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.59 ____ _
% 0.19/0.59 ___ / __ \_____(_)___ ________ __________
% 0.19/0.59 / _ \/ /_/ / ___/ / __ \/ ___/ _ \/ ___/ ___/
% 0.19/0.59 / __/ ____/ / / / / / / /__/ __(__ |__ )
% 0.19/0.59 \___/_/ /_/ /_/_/ /_/\___/\___/____/____/
% 0.19/0.59
% 0.19/0.59 A Theorem Prover for First-Order Logic
% 0.19/0.59 (ePrincess v.1.0)
% 0.19/0.59
% 0.19/0.59 (c) Philipp Rümmer, 2009-2015
% 0.19/0.59 (c) Peter Backeman, 2014-2015
% 0.19/0.59 (contributions by Angelo Brillout, Peter Baumgartner)
% 0.19/0.59 Free software under GNU Lesser General Public License (LGPL).
% 0.19/0.59 Bug reports to peter@backeman.se
% 0.19/0.59
% 0.19/0.59 For more information, visit http://user.uu.se/~petba168/breu/
% 0.19/0.59
% 0.19/0.59 Loading /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ...
% 0.69/0.66 Prover 0: Options: -triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMaximal -resolutionMethod=nonUnifying +ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all
% 1.34/0.89 Prover 0: Preprocessing ...
% 1.67/1.03 Prover 0: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 1.67/1.04 Prover 0: Constructing countermodel ...
% 3.18/1.49 Prover 0: gave up
% 3.18/1.49 Prover 1: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -resolutionMethod=normal +ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all
% 3.35/1.51 Prover 1: Preprocessing ...
% 3.52/1.56 Prover 1: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 3.52/1.56 Prover 1: Constructing countermodel ...
% 3.52/1.58 Prover 1: gave up
% 3.52/1.58 Prover 2: Options: +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -resolutionMethod=nonUnifying +ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all
% 3.52/1.60 Prover 2: Preprocessing ...
% 3.87/1.65 Prover 2: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 3.87/1.65 Prover 2: Constructing countermodel ...
% 3.87/1.68 Prover 2: gave up
% 3.87/1.68 Prover 3: Options: -triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -resolutionMethod=nonUnifying +ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all
% 4.16/1.69 Prover 3: Preprocessing ...
% 4.16/1.72 Prover 3: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 4.16/1.72 Prover 3: Constructing countermodel ...
% 4.16/1.74 Prover 3: gave up
% 4.16/1.74 Prover 4: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -resolutionMethod=nonUnifying +ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=complete
% 4.16/1.75 Prover 4: Preprocessing ...
% 4.55/1.80 Prover 4: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 4.55/1.80 Prover 4: Constructing countermodel ...
% 9.27/2.97 Prover 5: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMinimal -resolutionMethod=nonUnifying +ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all
% 9.64/2.99 Prover 5: Preprocessing ...
% 9.79/3.02 Prover 5: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 9.79/3.02 Prover 5: Constructing countermodel ...
% 9.79/3.04 Prover 5: gave up
% 9.79/3.04 Prover 6: Options: +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -resolutionMethod=normal +ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all
% 9.79/3.06 Prover 6: Preprocessing ...
% 9.79/3.09 Prover 6: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 9.79/3.10 Prover 6: Constructing countermodel ...
% 10.21/3.12 Prover 6: gave up
% 10.21/3.12 Prover 7: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximalOutermost -resolutionMethod=normal -ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all
% 10.21/3.13 Prover 7: Preprocessing ...
% 10.21/3.15 Prover 7: Proving ...
% 18.36/5.29 Prover 7: proved (2165ms)
% 18.36/5.29 Prover 4: stopped
% 18.36/5.29
% 18.36/5.29 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 18.36/5.29
% 18.36/5.29 Generating proof ... found it (size 49)
% 77.32/53.63
% 77.32/53.63 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% 77.32/53.63 Assumed formulas after preprocessing and simplification:
% 77.32/53.63 | (0) ! [v0] : ! [v1] : ! [v2] : ! [v3] : ! [v4] : ( ~ (singleton(v0) = v3) | ~ (unordered_pair(v2, v3) = v4) | ~ (unordered_pair(v0, v1) = v2) | ordered_pair(v0, v1) = v4) & ! [v0] : ! [v1] : ! [v2] : ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 | ~ (ordered_pair(v3, v2) = v1) | ~ (ordered_pair(v3, v2) = v0)) & ! [v0] : ! [v1] : ! [v2] : ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 | ~ (unordered_pair(v3, v2) = v1) | ~ (unordered_pair(v3, v2) = v0)) & ! [v0] : ! [v1] : ! [v2] : (v1 = v0 | ~ (singleton(v2) = v1) | ~ (singleton(v2) = v0)) & ! [v0] : ! [v1] : ! [v2] : ( ~ (ordered_pair(v0, v1) = v2) | ~ empty(v2)) & ! [v0] : ! [v1] : ! [v2] : ( ~ (unordered_pair(v0, v1) = v2) | unordered_pair(v1, v0) = v2) & ! [v0] : ! [v1] : (v1 = v0 | ? [v2] : (( ~ in(v2, v1) | ~ in(v2, v0)) & (in(v2, v1) | in(v2, v0)))) & ! [v0] : ! [v1] : ( ~ in(v1, v0) | ~ in(v0, v1)) & ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & ! [v2] : ! [v3] : ! [v4] : ( ~ (ordered_pair(v2, v3) = v4) | ~ in(v4, v1) | in(v4, v0)) & ! [v2] : ! [v3] : ! [v4] : ( ~ (ordered_pair(v2, v3) = v4) | ~ in(v4, v0) | in(v4, v1)) & ! [v2] : ( ~ in(v2, v1) | ? [v3] : ? [v4] : ordered_pair(v3, v4) = v2) & ! [v2] : ( ~ in(v2, v0) | ? [v3] : ? [v4] : ordered_pair(v3, v4) = v2)) & ? [v0] : ~ empty(v0) & ? [v0] : empty(v0)
% 77.32/53.65 | Applying alpha-rule on (0) yields:
% 77.32/53.65 | (1) ? [v0] : empty(v0)
% 77.32/53.65 | (2) ! [v0] : ! [v1] : ! [v2] : ! [v3] : ! [v4] : ( ~ (singleton(v0) = v3) | ~ (unordered_pair(v2, v3) = v4) | ~ (unordered_pair(v0, v1) = v2) | ordered_pair(v0, v1) = v4)
% 77.32/53.65 | (3) ! [v0] : ! [v1] : ! [v2] : ( ~ (unordered_pair(v0, v1) = v2) | unordered_pair(v1, v0) = v2)
% 77.32/53.65 | (4) ! [v0] : ! [v1] : ( ~ in(v1, v0) | ~ in(v0, v1))
% 77.32/53.65 | (5) ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & ! [v2] : ! [v3] : ! [v4] : ( ~ (ordered_pair(v2, v3) = v4) | ~ in(v4, v1) | in(v4, v0)) & ! [v2] : ! [v3] : ! [v4] : ( ~ (ordered_pair(v2, v3) = v4) | ~ in(v4, v0) | in(v4, v1)) & ! [v2] : ( ~ in(v2, v1) | ? [v3] : ? [v4] : ordered_pair(v3, v4) = v2) & ! [v2] : ( ~ in(v2, v0) | ? [v3] : ? [v4] : ordered_pair(v3, v4) = v2))
% 77.32/53.65 | (6) ! [v0] : ! [v1] : ! [v2] : ( ~ (ordered_pair(v0, v1) = v2) | ~ empty(v2))
% 77.32/53.65 | (7) ! [v0] : ! [v1] : ! [v2] : ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 | ~ (unordered_pair(v3, v2) = v1) | ~ (unordered_pair(v3, v2) = v0))
% 77.32/53.66 | (8) ? [v0] : ~ empty(v0)
% 77.32/53.66 | (9) ! [v0] : ! [v1] : ! [v2] : (v1 = v0 | ~ (singleton(v2) = v1) | ~ (singleton(v2) = v0))
% 77.32/53.66 | (10) ! [v0] : ! [v1] : (v1 = v0 | ? [v2] : (( ~ in(v2, v1) | ~ in(v2, v0)) & (in(v2, v1) | in(v2, v0))))
% 77.32/53.66 | (11) ! [v0] : ! [v1] : ! [v2] : ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 | ~ (ordered_pair(v3, v2) = v1) | ~ (ordered_pair(v3, v2) = v0))
% 77.32/53.66 |
% 77.32/53.66 | Instantiating (5) with all_3_0_1, all_3_1_2 yields:
% 77.32/53.66 | (12) ~ (all_3_0_1 = all_3_1_2) & ! [v0] : ! [v1] : ! [v2] : ( ~ (ordered_pair(v0, v1) = v2) | ~ in(v2, all_3_0_1) | in(v2, all_3_1_2)) & ! [v0] : ! [v1] : ! [v2] : ( ~ (ordered_pair(v0, v1) = v2) | ~ in(v2, all_3_1_2) | in(v2, all_3_0_1)) & ! [v0] : ( ~ in(v0, all_3_0_1) | ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ordered_pair(v1, v2) = v0) & ! [v0] : ( ~ in(v0, all_3_1_2) | ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ordered_pair(v1, v2) = v0)
% 77.32/53.66 |
% 77.32/53.66 | Applying alpha-rule on (12) yields:
% 77.32/53.66 | (13) ! [v0] : ! [v1] : ! [v2] : ( ~ (ordered_pair(v0, v1) = v2) | ~ in(v2, all_3_1_2) | in(v2, all_3_0_1))
% 77.32/53.66 | (14) ! [v0] : ! [v1] : ! [v2] : ( ~ (ordered_pair(v0, v1) = v2) | ~ in(v2, all_3_0_1) | in(v2, all_3_1_2))
% 77.32/53.66 | (15) ~ (all_3_0_1 = all_3_1_2)
% 77.32/53.66 | (16) ! [v0] : ( ~ in(v0, all_3_0_1) | ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ordered_pair(v1, v2) = v0)
% 77.32/53.66 | (17) ! [v0] : ( ~ in(v0, all_3_1_2) | ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ordered_pair(v1, v2) = v0)
% 77.32/53.66 |
% 77.32/53.66 | Introducing new symbol ex_14_1_5 defined by:
% 77.32/53.66 | (18) ex_14_1_5 = all_3_1_2
% 77.32/53.66 |
% 77.32/53.66 | Introducing new symbol ex_14_0_4 defined by:
% 77.32/53.66 | (19) ex_14_0_4 = all_3_0_1
% 77.32/53.66 |
% 77.32/53.66 | Instantiating formula (10) with ex_14_0_4, ex_14_1_5 yields:
% 77.32/53.66 | (20) ex_14_0_4 = ex_14_1_5 | ? [v0] : (( ~ in(v0, ex_14_0_4) | ~ in(v0, ex_14_1_5)) & (in(v0, ex_14_0_4) | in(v0, ex_14_1_5)))
% 77.32/53.66 |
% 77.32/53.66 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (20), into two cases.
% 77.32/53.66 |-Branch one:
% 77.32/53.66 | (21) ex_14_0_4 = ex_14_1_5
% 77.32/53.66 |
% 77.32/53.66 | Combining equations (19,21) yields a new equation:
% 77.32/53.66 | (22) ex_14_1_5 = all_3_0_1
% 77.32/53.66 |
% 77.32/53.66 | Combining equations (22,18) yields a new equation:
% 77.32/53.66 | (23) all_3_0_1 = all_3_1_2
% 77.32/53.66 |
% 77.32/53.66 | Simplifying 23 yields:
% 77.32/53.66 | (24) all_3_0_1 = all_3_1_2
% 77.32/53.66 |
% 77.32/53.66 | Equations (24) can reduce 15 to:
% 77.32/53.66 | (25) $false
% 77.32/53.66 |
% 77.32/53.66 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 77.32/53.66 |-Branch two:
% 77.32/53.66 | (26) ? [v0] : (( ~ in(v0, ex_14_0_4) | ~ in(v0, ex_14_1_5)) & (in(v0, ex_14_0_4) | in(v0, ex_14_1_5)))
% 77.32/53.66 |
% 77.32/53.66 | Instantiating (26) with all_17_0_6 yields:
% 77.32/53.66 | (27) ( ~ in(all_17_0_6, ex_14_0_4) | ~ in(all_17_0_6, ex_14_1_5)) & (in(all_17_0_6, ex_14_0_4) | in(all_17_0_6, ex_14_1_5))
% 77.32/53.66 |
% 77.32/53.66 | Applying alpha-rule on (27) yields:
% 77.32/53.66 | (28) ~ in(all_17_0_6, ex_14_0_4) | ~ in(all_17_0_6, ex_14_1_5)
% 77.32/53.66 | (29) in(all_17_0_6, ex_14_0_4) | in(all_17_0_6, ex_14_1_5)
% 77.32/53.67 |
% 77.32/53.67 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (28), into two cases.
% 77.32/53.67 |-Branch one:
% 77.32/53.67 | (30) ~ in(all_17_0_6, ex_14_0_4)
% 77.32/53.67 |
% 77.32/53.67 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (29), into two cases.
% 77.32/53.67 |-Branch one:
% 77.32/53.67 | (31) in(all_17_0_6, ex_14_0_4)
% 77.32/53.67 |
% 77.32/53.67 | Using (31) and (30) yields:
% 77.32/53.67 | (32) $false
% 77.32/53.67 |
% 77.32/53.67 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 77.32/53.67 |-Branch two:
% 77.32/53.67 | (33) in(all_17_0_6, ex_14_1_5)
% 77.32/53.67 |
% 77.32/53.67 | Instantiating formula (16) with all_17_0_6 yields:
% 77.32/53.67 | (34) ~ in(all_17_0_6, all_3_0_1) | ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ordered_pair(v0, v1) = all_17_0_6
% 77.32/53.67 |
% 77.32/53.67 | Instantiating formula (17) with all_17_0_6 yields:
% 77.32/53.67 | (35) ~ in(all_17_0_6, all_3_1_2) | ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ordered_pair(v0, v1) = all_17_0_6
% 77.32/53.67 |
% 77.32/53.67 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (35), into two cases.
% 77.32/53.67 |-Branch one:
% 77.32/53.67 | (36) ~ in(all_17_0_6, all_3_1_2)
% 77.32/53.67 |
% 77.32/53.67 | From (18) and (33) follows:
% 77.32/53.67 | (37) in(all_17_0_6, all_3_1_2)
% 77.32/53.67 |
% 77.32/53.67 | Using (37) and (36) yields:
% 77.32/53.67 | (32) $false
% 77.32/53.67 |
% 77.32/53.67 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 77.32/53.67 |-Branch two:
% 77.32/53.67 | (37) in(all_17_0_6, all_3_1_2)
% 77.32/53.67 | (40) ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ordered_pair(v0, v1) = all_17_0_6
% 77.32/53.67 |
% 77.32/53.67 | Instantiating (40) with all_35_0_26, all_35_1_27 yields:
% 77.32/53.67 | (41) ordered_pair(all_35_1_27, all_35_0_26) = all_17_0_6
% 77.32/53.67 |
% 77.32/53.67 | Instantiating formula (13) with all_17_0_6, all_35_0_26, all_35_1_27 and discharging atoms ordered_pair(all_35_1_27, all_35_0_26) = all_17_0_6, yields:
% 77.32/53.67 | (42) ~ in(all_17_0_6, all_3_1_2) | in(all_17_0_6, all_3_0_1)
% 77.32/53.67 |
% 77.32/53.67 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (34), into two cases.
% 77.32/53.67 |-Branch one:
% 77.32/53.67 | (43) ~ in(all_17_0_6, all_3_0_1)
% 77.32/53.67 |
% 77.32/53.67 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (42), into two cases.
% 77.32/53.67 |-Branch one:
% 77.32/53.67 | (36) ~ in(all_17_0_6, all_3_1_2)
% 77.32/53.67 |
% 77.32/53.67 | Using (37) and (36) yields:
% 77.32/53.67 | (32) $false
% 77.32/53.67 |
% 77.32/53.67 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 77.32/53.67 |-Branch two:
% 77.32/53.67 | (46) in(all_17_0_6, all_3_0_1)
% 77.32/53.67 |
% 77.32/53.67 | Using (46) and (43) yields:
% 77.32/53.67 | (32) $false
% 77.32/53.67 |
% 77.32/53.67 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 77.32/53.67 |-Branch two:
% 77.32/53.67 | (46) in(all_17_0_6, all_3_0_1)
% 77.32/53.67 | (40) ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ordered_pair(v0, v1) = all_17_0_6
% 77.32/53.67 |
% 77.32/53.67 | From (19) and (30) follows:
% 77.32/53.67 | (43) ~ in(all_17_0_6, all_3_0_1)
% 77.32/53.67 |
% 77.32/53.67 | Using (46) and (43) yields:
% 77.32/53.67 | (32) $false
% 77.32/53.67 |
% 77.32/53.67 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 77.32/53.67 |-Branch two:
% 77.32/53.67 | (31) in(all_17_0_6, ex_14_0_4)
% 77.32/53.67 | (53) ~ in(all_17_0_6, ex_14_1_5)
% 77.32/53.67 |
% 77.32/53.67 | Instantiating formula (16) with all_17_0_6 yields:
% 77.32/53.67 | (34) ~ in(all_17_0_6, all_3_0_1) | ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ordered_pair(v0, v1) = all_17_0_6
% 77.32/53.67 |
% 77.32/53.67 | Instantiating formula (17) with all_17_0_6 yields:
% 77.32/53.67 | (35) ~ in(all_17_0_6, all_3_1_2) | ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ordered_pair(v0, v1) = all_17_0_6
% 77.32/53.67 |
% 77.32/53.67 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (35), into two cases.
% 77.32/53.67 |-Branch one:
% 77.32/53.67 | (36) ~ in(all_17_0_6, all_3_1_2)
% 77.32/53.67 |
% 77.32/53.67 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (34), into two cases.
% 77.32/53.67 |-Branch one:
% 77.32/53.67 | (43) ~ in(all_17_0_6, all_3_0_1)
% 77.32/53.67 |
% 77.32/53.67 | From (19) and (31) follows:
% 77.32/53.67 | (46) in(all_17_0_6, all_3_0_1)
% 77.32/53.67 |
% 77.32/53.67 | Using (46) and (43) yields:
% 77.32/53.67 | (32) $false
% 77.32/53.67 |
% 77.32/53.67 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 77.32/53.67 |-Branch two:
% 77.32/53.67 | (46) in(all_17_0_6, all_3_0_1)
% 77.32/53.67 | (40) ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ordered_pair(v0, v1) = all_17_0_6
% 77.32/53.67 |
% 77.32/53.67 | Instantiating (40) with all_42_0_28, all_42_1_29 yields:
% 77.32/53.67 | (62) ordered_pair(all_42_1_29, all_42_0_28) = all_17_0_6
% 77.32/53.67 |
% 77.32/53.67 | Instantiating formula (14) with all_17_0_6, all_42_0_28, all_42_1_29 and discharging atoms ordered_pair(all_42_1_29, all_42_0_28) = all_17_0_6, ~ in(all_17_0_6, all_3_1_2), yields:
% 77.32/53.67 | (43) ~ in(all_17_0_6, all_3_0_1)
% 77.32/53.67 |
% 77.32/53.67 | Using (46) and (43) yields:
% 77.32/53.67 | (32) $false
% 77.32/53.67 |
% 77.32/53.67 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 77.32/53.67 |-Branch two:
% 77.32/53.67 | (37) in(all_17_0_6, all_3_1_2)
% 77.32/53.67 | (40) ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ordered_pair(v0, v1) = all_17_0_6
% 77.32/53.67 |
% 77.32/53.67 | From (18) and (53) follows:
% 77.32/53.67 | (36) ~ in(all_17_0_6, all_3_1_2)
% 77.32/53.67 |
% 77.32/53.67 | Using (37) and (36) yields:
% 77.32/53.67 | (32) $false
% 77.32/53.67 |
% 77.32/53.67 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 77.32/53.67 % SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark
% 77.32/53.67
% 77.32/53.67 53068ms
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------