TSTP Solution File: SET945+1 by SNARK---20120808r022

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SNARK---20120808r022
% Problem  : SET945+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run-snark %s %d

% Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 05:13:36 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.78s 0.99s
% Output   : Refutation 0.85s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :    8
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   17 (   8 unt;   3 nHn;  14 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   31 (   4 equ;  14 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    5 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   25 (   3 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(2,axiom,
    ( X != set_intersection2(Y,Z)
    | ~ in(U,X)
    | in(U,Y) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d3_xboole_0) ).

cnf(3,axiom,
    ( X != set_intersection2(Y,Z)
    | in(U,X)
    | ~ in(U,Y)
    | ~ in(U,Z) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d3_xboole_0) ).

cnf(7,axiom,
    ( X != union(Y)
    | ~ in(Z,X)
    | in(Z,'SKOLEMAABD2'(Z,Y)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d4_tarski) ).

cnf(8,axiom,
    ( X != union(Y)
    | ~ in(Z,X)
    | in('SKOLEMAABD2'(Z,Y),Y) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d4_tarski) ).

cnf(16,axiom,
    ( disjoint(X,Y)
    | in('SKOLEMAABD7'(X,Y),set_intersection2(X,Y)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t4_xboole_0) ).

cnf(17,axiom,
    ( ~ in(X,set_intersection2(Y,Z))
    | ~ disjoint(Y,Z) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t4_xboole_0) ).

cnf(18,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ in(X,'SKOLEMAABD8')
    | disjoint(X,'SKOLEMAABD9') ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t98_zfmisc_1) ).

cnf(19,negated_conjecture,
    ~ disjoint(union('SKOLEMAABD8'),'SKOLEMAABD9'),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t98_zfmisc_1) ).

cnf(25,plain,
    ( disjoint(X,Y)
    | in('SKOLEMAABD7'(X,Y),X) ),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[2,16,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(26,plain,
    ( disjoint(X,Y)
    | in('SKOLEMAABD7'(X,Y),Y) ),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[2,16,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(94,plain,
    in('SKOLEMAABD7'(union('SKOLEMAABD8'),'SKOLEMAABD9'),union('SKOLEMAABD8')),
    inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[25,19]) ).

cnf(132,plain,
    in('SKOLEMAABD7'(union('SKOLEMAABD8'),'SKOLEMAABD9'),'SKOLEMAABD9'),
    inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[26,19]) ).

cnf(167,plain,
    in('SKOLEMAABD2'('SKOLEMAABD7'(union('SKOLEMAABD8'),'SKOLEMAABD9'),'SKOLEMAABD8'),'SKOLEMAABD8'),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[8,94,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(168,plain,
    in('SKOLEMAABD7'(union('SKOLEMAABD8'),'SKOLEMAABD9'),'SKOLEMAABD2'('SKOLEMAABD7'(union('SKOLEMAABD8'),'SKOLEMAABD9'),'SKOLEMAABD8')),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[7,94,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(229,plain,
    disjoint('SKOLEMAABD2'('SKOLEMAABD7'(union('SKOLEMAABD8'),'SKOLEMAABD9'),'SKOLEMAABD8'),'SKOLEMAABD9'),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[18,167]) ).

cnf(351,plain,
    ~ in(X,set_intersection2('SKOLEMAABD2'('SKOLEMAABD7'(union('SKOLEMAABD8'),'SKOLEMAABD9'),'SKOLEMAABD8'),'SKOLEMAABD9')),
    inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[17,229]) ).

cnf(524,plain,
    $false,
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[3,168,132,theory(equality)]),351]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.09/0.11  % Problem  : SET945+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.09/0.12  % Command  : run-snark %s %d
% 0.13/0.33  % Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.33  % DateTime : Sun Jul 10 01:46:40 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.19/0.46  /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.47  * 
% 0.19/0.47  * 
% 0.19/0.48  #<PACKAGE "SNARK-USER">
% 0.19/0.48  * 
% 0.19/0.48  SNARK-TPTP-OPTIONS
% 0.19/0.48  * 
% 0.19/0.48  ((AGENDA-LENGTH-LIMIT NIL) (AGENDA-LENGTH-BEFORE-SIMPLIFICATION-LIMIT NIL)
% 0.19/0.48   (USE-HYPERRESOLUTION T) (USE-UR-RESOLUTION T) (USE-PARAMODULATION T)
% 0.19/0.48   (USE-FACTORING :POS)
% 0.19/0.48   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-HYPERRESOLUTION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.19/0.48   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-PARAMODULATION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.19/0.48   (ORDERING-FUNCTIONS>CONSTANTS T) (ASSERT-CONTEXT :CURRENT)
% 0.19/0.48   (RUN-TIME-LIMIT 300) (LISTEN-FOR-COMMANDS NIL)
% 0.19/0.48   (USE-CLOSURE-WHEN-SATISFIABLE T) (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-GIVEN NIL)
% 0.19/0.48   (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-DERIVED NIL) (PRINT-UNORIENTABLE-ROWS NIL)
% 0.19/0.48   (PRINT-ROW-WFFS-PRETTILY NIL) (PRINT-FINAL-ROWS :TPTP)
% 0.19/0.48   (PRINT-OPTIONS-WHEN-STARTING NIL) (USE-VARIABLE-NAME-SORTS NIL)
% 0.19/0.48   (USE-PURITY-TEST T) (USE-RELEVANCE-TEST T) (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS1)
% 0.19/0.48   (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS2))
% 0.19/0.48  * 
% 0.19/0.48  "."
% 0.19/0.48  * 
% 0.19/0.48  ; Begin refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-07-10T01:46:40
% 0.19/0.48  ; Running SNARK from /davis/home/graph/tptp/Systems/SNARK---20120808r022/Source/snark-system.lisp in SBCL 1.0.12 on n022.cluster.edu at 2022-07-10T01:46:40
% 0.19/0.50  
% 0.19/0.50  ; Recognized commutativity assertion (= (|set_intersection2| ?X ?Y) (|set_intersection2| ?Y ?X)).
% 0.19/0.50  ; Recognized commutativity assertion (OR (NOT (|disjoint| ?X ?Y)) (|disjoint| ?Y ?X)).
% 0.19/0.50  ; Declaring set_intersection2 to be commutative.
% 0.78/0.99  ; Declaring disjoint to be commutative.
% 0.78/0.99  
% 0.78/0.99  #||
% 0.78/0.99  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.78/0.99  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.85/1.00  ||#
% 0.85/1.00  
% 0.85/1.00  ; Summary of computation:
% 0.85/1.00  ;      2697 formulas have been input or derived (from 88 formulas).
% 0.85/1.00  ;       524 (19%) were retained.  Of these,
% 0.85/1.00  ;           13 ( 2%) were simplified or subsumed later,
% 0.85/1.00  ;          511 (98%) are still being kept.
% 0.85/1.00  ; 
% 0.85/1.00  ; Run time in seconds excluding printing time:
% 0.85/1.00  ;     0.004   1%   Read assertion file          (1 call)
% 0.85/1.00  ;     0.001   0%   Assert                       (10 calls)
% 0.85/1.00  ;     0.080  16%   Process new row              (1,812 calls)
% 0.85/1.00  ;     0.111  22%   Resolution                   (174 calls)
% 0.85/1.00  ;     0.003   1%   Paramodulation               (87 calls)
% 0.85/1.00  ;     0.001   0%   Factoring                    (17 calls)
% 0.85/1.00  ;     0.024   5%   Condensing                   (1,041 calls)
% 0.85/1.00  ;     0.101  20%   Forward subsumption          (1,041 calls)
% 0.85/1.00  ;     0.019   4%   Backward subsumption         (385 calls)
% 0.85/1.00  ;     0.046   9%   Clause clause subsumption    (5,543 calls)
% 0.85/1.00  ;     0.061  12%   Forward simplification       (1,812 calls)
% 0.85/1.01  ;     0.002   0%   Backward simplification      (524 calls)
% 0.85/1.01  ;     0.010   2%   Ordering                     (3,070 calls)
% 0.85/1.01  ;     0.000   0%   Sortal reasoning             (32 calls)
% 0.85/1.01  ;     0.000   0%   Purity testing               (1 call)
% 0.85/1.01  ;     0.044   9%   Other
% 0.85/1.01  ;     0.507        Total
% 0.85/1.01  ;     0.521        Real time
% 0.85/1.01  ; 
% 0.85/1.01  ; Term-hash-array has 1,123 terms in all.
% 0.85/1.01  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 378 entries (378 at peak, 385 added, 7 deleted).
% 0.85/1.01  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 928 nodes (928 at peak, 958 added, 30 deleted).
% 0.85/1.01  ;  Retrieved 12,525 possibly forward subsuming rows in 1,041 calls.
% 0.85/1.01  ;  Retrieved 2,123 possibly backward subsumed rows in 385 calls.
% 0.85/1.01  ; Path-index has 1,107 entries (1,107 at peak, 1,133 added, 26 deleted).
% 0.85/1.01  ; Path-index has 1,993 nodes (1,993 at peak, 2,008 added, 15 deleted).
% 0.85/1.01  ; Trie-index has 1,107 entries (1,107 at peak, 1,133 added, 26 deleted).
% 0.85/1.01  ; Trie-index has 3,817 nodes (3,817 at peak, 3,917 added, 100 deleted).
% 0.85/1.01  ; Retrieved 4,024 generalization terms in 6,862 calls.
% 0.85/1.01  ; Retrieved 158 instance terms in 138 calls.
% 0.85/1.01  ; Retrieved 77,220 unifiable terms in 2,831 calls.
% 0.85/1.01  ; 
% 0.85/1.01  ; The agenda of rows to process has 66 entries:
% 0.85/1.01  ;     2 with value 23              3 with value 32               1 with value 46
% 0.85/1.01  ;     1 with value 24              1 with value 33               3 with value 48
% 0.85/1.01  ;     3 with value 25              4 with value 34               2 with value 49
% 0.85/1.01  ;     1 with value 26              5 with value 38               1 with value 50
% 0.85/1.01  ;    10 with value 27              1 with value 40               2 with value 51
% 0.85/1.01  ;     1 with value 28              2 with value 41               1 with value 55
% 0.85/1.01  ;     2 with value 29             10 with value 42               2 with value 57
% 0.85/1.01  ;     5 with value 31              1 with value 44               2 with value 58
% 0.85/1.01  ; The agenda of rows to give has 423 entries:
% 0.85/1.01  ;    11 with value (4 18)         14 with value (4 30)          18 with value (4 42)
% 0.85/1.01  ;     7 with value (4 19)          4 with value (4 31)          10 with value (4 43)
% 0.85/1.01  ;    18 with value (4 20)         24 with value (4 32)          13 with value (4 44)
% 0.85/1.01  ;    16 with value (4 21)         11 with value (4 33)           9 with value (4 45)
% 0.85/1.01  ;    12 with value (4 22)         10 with value (4 34)           9 with value (4 46)
% 0.85/1.01  ;     9 with value (4 23)          7 with value (4 35)          12 with value (4 47)
% 0.85/1.01  ;    17 with value (4 24)          9 with value (4 36)          12 with value (4 48)
% 0.85/1.01  ;     7 with value (4 25)         19 with value (4 37)          12 with value (4 49)
% 0.85/1.01  ;    12 with value (4 26)         16 with value (4 38)          14 with value (4 51)
% 0.85/1.01  ;     7 with value (4 27)         24 with value (4 39)          12 with value (4 52)
% 0.85/1.01  ;     4 with value (4 28)         10 with value (4 40)           4 with value (4 53)
% 0.85/1.01  ;    10 with value (4 29)         16 with value (4 41)           4 with value (4 54)
% 0.85/1.01  Evaluation took:
% 0.85/1.01    0.522 seconds of real time
% 0.85/1.01    0.483575 seconds of user run time
% 0.85/1.01    0.036978 seconds of system run time
% 0.85/1.01    [Run times include 0.021 seconds GC run time.]
% 0.85/1.01    0 calls to %EVAL
% 0.85/1.01    0 page faults and
% 0.85/1.01    26,370,120 bytes consed.
% 0.85/1.01  :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.85/1.01  ; End refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-07-10T01:46:41
% 0.85/1.01  :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.85/1.01  * 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------