TSTP Solution File: SET940+1 by Etableau---0.67
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Etableau---0.67
% Problem : SET940+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s
% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 01:04:00 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.13s 0.37s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.13s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 2
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 8 ( 8 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 8 ( 7 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 3 ( 3 ~; 0 |; 0 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 4 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 0 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 2 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 10 ( 0 sgn 8 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(t93_zfmisc_1,conjecture,
! [X1,X2] : union(unordered_pair(X1,X2)) = set_union2(X1,X2),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t93_zfmisc_1) ).
fof(l52_zfmisc_1,axiom,
! [X1,X2] : union(unordered_pair(X1,X2)) = set_union2(X1,X2),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',l52_zfmisc_1) ).
fof(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X1,X2] : union(unordered_pair(X1,X2)) = set_union2(X1,X2),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[t93_zfmisc_1]) ).
fof(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
union(unordered_pair(esk3_0,esk4_0)) != set_union2(esk3_0,esk4_0),
inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])])]) ).
fof(c_0_4,plain,
! [X16,X17] : union(unordered_pair(X16,X17)) = set_union2(X16,X17),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[l52_zfmisc_1]) ).
cnf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
union(unordered_pair(esk3_0,esk4_0)) != set_union2(esk3_0,esk4_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,plain,
union(unordered_pair(X1,X2)) = set_union2(X1,X2),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : SET940+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Sun Jul 10 15:27:05 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.13/0.37 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.13/0.37 # Auto-Mode selected heuristic G_E___207_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S0S
% 0.13/0.37 # and selection function SelectComplexG.
% 0.13/0.37 #
% 0.13/0.37 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.13/0.37
% 0.13/0.37 # Proof found!
% 0.13/0.37 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.13/0.37 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.13/0.37 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------