TSTP Solution File: SET893+1 by SRASS---0.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SRASS---0.1
% Problem  : SET893+1 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : SRASS -q2 -a 0 10 10 10 -i3 -n60 %s

% Computer : art11.cs.miami.edu
% Model    : i686 i686
% CPU      : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 3.00GHz @ 3000MHz
% Memory   : 2006MB
% OS       : Linux 2.6.31.5-127.fc12.i686.PAE
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Dec 30 00:21:05 EST 2010

% Result   : Theorem 1.11s
% Output   : Solution 1.11s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    : 0

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ERROR: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Reading problem from /tmp/SystemOnTPTP31727/SET893+1.tptp
% Adding relevance values
% Extracting the conjecture
% Sorting axioms by relevance
% Looking for THM       ... 
% found
% SZS status THM for /tmp/SystemOnTPTP31727/SET893+1.tptp
% SZS output start Solution for /tmp/SystemOnTPTP31727/SET893+1.tptp
% TreeLimitedRun: ----------------------------------------------------------
% TreeLimitedRun: /home/graph/tptp/Systems/EP---1.2/eproof --print-statistics -xAuto -tAuto --cpu-limit=60 --proof-time-unlimited --memory-limit=Auto --tstp-in --tstp-out /tmp/SRASS.s.p 
% TreeLimitedRun: CPU time limit is 60s
% TreeLimitedRun: WC  time limit is 120s
% TreeLimitedRun: PID is 31859
% TreeLimitedRun: ----------------------------------------------------------
% PrfWatch: 0.00 CPU 0.01 WC
% # Preprocessing time     : 0.011 s
% # Problem is unsatisfiable (or provable), constructing proof object
% # SZS status Theorem
% # SZS output start CNFRefutation.
% fof(2, axiom,![X1]:![X2]:(X2=singleton(X1)<=>![X3]:(in(X3,X2)<=>X3=X1)),file('/tmp/SRASS.s.p', d1_tarski)).
% fof(3, axiom,![X1]:![X2]:![X3]:![X4]:(in(ordered_pair(X1,X2),cartesian_product2(X3,X4))<=>(in(X1,X3)&in(X2,X4))),file('/tmp/SRASS.s.p', l55_zfmisc_1)).
% fof(4, axiom,![X1]:![X2]:ordered_pair(X1,X2)=unordered_pair(unordered_pair(X1,X2),singleton(X1)),file('/tmp/SRASS.s.p', d5_tarski)).
% fof(5, axiom,![X1]:![X2]:unordered_pair(X1,X2)=unordered_pair(X2,X1),file('/tmp/SRASS.s.p', commutativity_k2_tarski)).
% fof(9, conjecture,![X1]:![X2]:![X3]:![X4]:(in(ordered_pair(X1,X2),cartesian_product2(singleton(X3),singleton(X4)))<=>(X1=X3&X2=X4)),file('/tmp/SRASS.s.p', t34_zfmisc_1)).
% fof(10, negated_conjecture,~(![X1]:![X2]:![X3]:![X4]:(in(ordered_pair(X1,X2),cartesian_product2(singleton(X3),singleton(X4)))<=>(X1=X3&X2=X4))),inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[9])).
% fof(17, plain,![X1]:![X2]:((~(X2=singleton(X1))|![X3]:((~(in(X3,X2))|X3=X1)&(~(X3=X1)|in(X3,X2))))&(?[X3]:((~(in(X3,X2))|~(X3=X1))&(in(X3,X2)|X3=X1))|X2=singleton(X1))),inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[2])).
% fof(18, plain,![X4]:![X5]:((~(X5=singleton(X4))|![X6]:((~(in(X6,X5))|X6=X4)&(~(X6=X4)|in(X6,X5))))&(?[X7]:((~(in(X7,X5))|~(X7=X4))&(in(X7,X5)|X7=X4))|X5=singleton(X4))),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[17])).
% fof(19, plain,![X4]:![X5]:((~(X5=singleton(X4))|![X6]:((~(in(X6,X5))|X6=X4)&(~(X6=X4)|in(X6,X5))))&(((~(in(esk1_2(X4,X5),X5))|~(esk1_2(X4,X5)=X4))&(in(esk1_2(X4,X5),X5)|esk1_2(X4,X5)=X4))|X5=singleton(X4))),inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[18])).
% fof(20, plain,![X4]:![X5]:![X6]:((((~(in(X6,X5))|X6=X4)&(~(X6=X4)|in(X6,X5)))|~(X5=singleton(X4)))&(((~(in(esk1_2(X4,X5),X5))|~(esk1_2(X4,X5)=X4))&(in(esk1_2(X4,X5),X5)|esk1_2(X4,X5)=X4))|X5=singleton(X4))),inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[19])).
% fof(21, plain,![X4]:![X5]:![X6]:((((~(in(X6,X5))|X6=X4)|~(X5=singleton(X4)))&((~(X6=X4)|in(X6,X5))|~(X5=singleton(X4))))&(((~(in(esk1_2(X4,X5),X5))|~(esk1_2(X4,X5)=X4))|X5=singleton(X4))&((in(esk1_2(X4,X5),X5)|esk1_2(X4,X5)=X4)|X5=singleton(X4)))),inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[20])).
% cnf(24,plain,(in(X3,X1)|X1!=singleton(X2)|X3!=X2),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[21])).
% cnf(25,plain,(X3=X2|X1!=singleton(X2)|~in(X3,X1)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[21])).
% fof(26, plain,![X1]:![X2]:![X3]:![X4]:((~(in(ordered_pair(X1,X2),cartesian_product2(X3,X4)))|(in(X1,X3)&in(X2,X4)))&((~(in(X1,X3))|~(in(X2,X4)))|in(ordered_pair(X1,X2),cartesian_product2(X3,X4)))),inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[3])).
% fof(27, plain,![X5]:![X6]:![X7]:![X8]:((~(in(ordered_pair(X5,X6),cartesian_product2(X7,X8)))|(in(X5,X7)&in(X6,X8)))&((~(in(X5,X7))|~(in(X6,X8)))|in(ordered_pair(X5,X6),cartesian_product2(X7,X8)))),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[26])).
% fof(28, plain,![X5]:![X6]:![X7]:![X8]:(((in(X5,X7)|~(in(ordered_pair(X5,X6),cartesian_product2(X7,X8))))&(in(X6,X8)|~(in(ordered_pair(X5,X6),cartesian_product2(X7,X8)))))&((~(in(X5,X7))|~(in(X6,X8)))|in(ordered_pair(X5,X6),cartesian_product2(X7,X8)))),inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[27])).
% cnf(29,plain,(in(ordered_pair(X1,X2),cartesian_product2(X3,X4))|~in(X2,X4)|~in(X1,X3)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[28])).
% cnf(30,plain,(in(X2,X4)|~in(ordered_pair(X1,X2),cartesian_product2(X3,X4))),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[28])).
% cnf(31,plain,(in(X1,X3)|~in(ordered_pair(X1,X2),cartesian_product2(X3,X4))),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[28])).
% fof(32, plain,![X3]:![X4]:ordered_pair(X3,X4)=unordered_pair(unordered_pair(X3,X4),singleton(X3)),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[4])).
% cnf(33,plain,(ordered_pair(X1,X2)=unordered_pair(unordered_pair(X1,X2),singleton(X1))),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[32])).
% fof(34, plain,![X3]:![X4]:unordered_pair(X3,X4)=unordered_pair(X4,X3),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[5])).
% cnf(35,plain,(unordered_pair(X1,X2)=unordered_pair(X2,X1)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[34])).
% fof(44, negated_conjecture,?[X1]:?[X2]:?[X3]:?[X4]:((~(in(ordered_pair(X1,X2),cartesian_product2(singleton(X3),singleton(X4))))|(~(X1=X3)|~(X2=X4)))&(in(ordered_pair(X1,X2),cartesian_product2(singleton(X3),singleton(X4)))|(X1=X3&X2=X4))),inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[10])).
% fof(45, negated_conjecture,?[X5]:?[X6]:?[X7]:?[X8]:((~(in(ordered_pair(X5,X6),cartesian_product2(singleton(X7),singleton(X8))))|(~(X5=X7)|~(X6=X8)))&(in(ordered_pair(X5,X6),cartesian_product2(singleton(X7),singleton(X8)))|(X5=X7&X6=X8))),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[44])).
% fof(46, negated_conjecture,((~(in(ordered_pair(esk4_0,esk5_0),cartesian_product2(singleton(esk6_0),singleton(esk7_0))))|(~(esk4_0=esk6_0)|~(esk5_0=esk7_0)))&(in(ordered_pair(esk4_0,esk5_0),cartesian_product2(singleton(esk6_0),singleton(esk7_0)))|(esk4_0=esk6_0&esk5_0=esk7_0))),inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[45])).
% fof(47, negated_conjecture,((~(in(ordered_pair(esk4_0,esk5_0),cartesian_product2(singleton(esk6_0),singleton(esk7_0))))|(~(esk4_0=esk6_0)|~(esk5_0=esk7_0)))&((esk4_0=esk6_0|in(ordered_pair(esk4_0,esk5_0),cartesian_product2(singleton(esk6_0),singleton(esk7_0))))&(esk5_0=esk7_0|in(ordered_pair(esk4_0,esk5_0),cartesian_product2(singleton(esk6_0),singleton(esk7_0)))))),inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[46])).
% cnf(48,negated_conjecture,(in(ordered_pair(esk4_0,esk5_0),cartesian_product2(singleton(esk6_0),singleton(esk7_0)))|esk5_0=esk7_0),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[47])).
% cnf(49,negated_conjecture,(in(ordered_pair(esk4_0,esk5_0),cartesian_product2(singleton(esk6_0),singleton(esk7_0)))|esk4_0=esk6_0),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[47])).
% cnf(50,negated_conjecture,(esk5_0!=esk7_0|esk4_0!=esk6_0|~in(ordered_pair(esk4_0,esk5_0),cartesian_product2(singleton(esk6_0),singleton(esk7_0)))),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[47])).
% cnf(51,negated_conjecture,(esk6_0=esk4_0|in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(esk4_0,esk5_0),singleton(esk4_0)),cartesian_product2(singleton(esk6_0),singleton(esk7_0)))),inference(rw,[status(thm)],[49,33,theory(equality)]),['unfolding']).
% cnf(52,negated_conjecture,(esk7_0=esk5_0|in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(esk4_0,esk5_0),singleton(esk4_0)),cartesian_product2(singleton(esk6_0),singleton(esk7_0)))),inference(rw,[status(thm)],[48,33,theory(equality)]),['unfolding']).
% cnf(53,plain,(in(X2,X4)|~in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(X1,X2),singleton(X1)),cartesian_product2(X3,X4))),inference(rw,[status(thm)],[30,33,theory(equality)]),['unfolding']).
% cnf(54,plain,(in(X1,X3)|~in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(X1,X2),singleton(X1)),cartesian_product2(X3,X4))),inference(rw,[status(thm)],[31,33,theory(equality)]),['unfolding']).
% cnf(55,plain,(in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(X1,X2),singleton(X1)),cartesian_product2(X3,X4))|~in(X2,X4)|~in(X1,X3)),inference(rw,[status(thm)],[29,33,theory(equality)]),['unfolding']).
% cnf(57,negated_conjecture,(esk6_0!=esk4_0|esk7_0!=esk5_0|~in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(esk4_0,esk5_0),singleton(esk4_0)),cartesian_product2(singleton(esk6_0),singleton(esk7_0)))),inference(rw,[status(thm)],[50,33,theory(equality)]),['unfolding']).
% cnf(58,plain,(in(X1,X2)|singleton(X1)!=X2),inference(er,[status(thm)],[24,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(59,negated_conjecture,(esk6_0=esk4_0|in(unordered_pair(singleton(esk4_0),unordered_pair(esk4_0,esk5_0)),cartesian_product2(singleton(esk6_0),singleton(esk7_0)))),inference(rw,[status(thm)],[51,35,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(61,negated_conjecture,(esk7_0=esk5_0|in(unordered_pair(singleton(esk4_0),unordered_pair(esk4_0,esk5_0)),cartesian_product2(singleton(esk6_0),singleton(esk7_0)))),inference(rw,[status(thm)],[52,35,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(62,negated_conjecture,(esk6_0!=esk4_0|esk7_0!=esk5_0|~in(unordered_pair(singleton(esk4_0),unordered_pair(esk4_0,esk5_0)),cartesian_product2(singleton(esk6_0),singleton(esk7_0)))),inference(rw,[status(thm)],[57,35,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(63,plain,(in(X2,X4)|~in(unordered_pair(singleton(X1),unordered_pair(X1,X2)),cartesian_product2(X3,X4))),inference(rw,[status(thm)],[53,35,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(64,plain,(in(X1,X3)|~in(unordered_pair(singleton(X1),unordered_pair(X1,X2)),cartesian_product2(X3,X4))),inference(rw,[status(thm)],[54,35,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(65,plain,(in(unordered_pair(singleton(X1),unordered_pair(X1,X2)),cartesian_product2(X3,X4))|~in(X2,X4)|~in(X1,X3)),inference(rw,[status(thm)],[55,35,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(78,negated_conjecture,(in(esk5_0,singleton(esk7_0))|esk7_0=esk5_0),inference(spm,[status(thm)],[63,61,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(89,negated_conjecture,(in(esk4_0,singleton(esk6_0))|esk6_0=esk4_0),inference(spm,[status(thm)],[64,59,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(93,negated_conjecture,(esk6_0!=esk4_0|esk7_0!=esk5_0|~in(esk5_0,singleton(esk7_0))|~in(esk4_0,singleton(esk6_0))),inference(spm,[status(thm)],[62,65,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(101,negated_conjecture,(X1=esk5_0|esk7_0=esk5_0|singleton(X1)!=singleton(esk7_0)),inference(spm,[status(thm)],[25,78,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(103,negated_conjecture,(X1=esk4_0|esk6_0=esk4_0|singleton(X1)!=singleton(esk6_0)),inference(spm,[status(thm)],[25,89,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(138,negated_conjecture,(esk6_0!=esk4_0|esk7_0!=esk5_0|~in(esk4_0,singleton(esk6_0))|singleton(esk5_0)!=singleton(esk7_0)),inference(spm,[status(thm)],[93,58,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(144,negated_conjecture,(esk7_0=esk5_0),inference(er,[status(thm)],[101,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(145,negated_conjecture,($false|esk6_0!=esk4_0|esk7_0!=esk5_0|~in(esk4_0,singleton(esk6_0))),inference(rw,[status(thm)],[138,144,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(146,negated_conjecture,($false|esk6_0!=esk4_0|$false|~in(esk4_0,singleton(esk6_0))),inference(rw,[status(thm)],[145,144,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(147,negated_conjecture,(esk6_0!=esk4_0|~in(esk4_0,singleton(esk6_0))),inference(cn,[status(thm)],[146,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(174,negated_conjecture,(esk6_0!=esk4_0|singleton(esk4_0)!=singleton(esk6_0)),inference(spm,[status(thm)],[147,58,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(178,negated_conjecture,(esk6_0=esk4_0),inference(er,[status(thm)],[103,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(193,negated_conjecture,($false|esk6_0!=esk4_0),inference(rw,[status(thm)],[174,178,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(194,negated_conjecture,($false|$false),inference(rw,[status(thm)],[193,178,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(195,negated_conjecture,($false),inference(cn,[status(thm)],[194,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(196,negated_conjecture,($false),195,['proof']).
% # SZS output end CNFRefutation
% # Processed clauses                  : 79
% # ...of these trivial                : 0
% # ...subsumed                        : 14
% # ...remaining for further processing: 65
% # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 1
% # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% # Backward-subsumed                  : 1
% # Backward-rewritten                 : 27
% # Generated clauses                  : 84
% # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 83
% # Contextual simplify-reflections    : 1
% # Paramodulations                    : 78
% # Factorizations                     : 0
% # Equation resolutions               : 6
% # Current number of processed clauses: 21
% #    Positive orientable unit clauses: 3
% #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 1
% #    Negative unit clauses           : 4
% #    Non-unit-clauses                : 13
% # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 21
% # ...number of literals in the above : 53
% # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 178
% # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 125
% # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 12
% # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound  : 0
% # Indexed BW rewrite attempts        : 2
% # Indexed BW rewrite successes       : 2
% # Backwards rewriting index:    20 leaves,   1.85+/-1.276 terms/leaf
% # Paramod-from index:            7 leaves,   1.14+/-0.350 terms/leaf
% # Paramod-into index:           17 leaves,   1.82+/-1.097 terms/leaf
% # -------------------------------------------------
% # User time              : 0.014 s
% # System time            : 0.003 s
% # Total time             : 0.017 s
% # Maximum resident set size: 0 pages
% PrfWatch: 0.12 CPU 0.18 WC
% FINAL PrfWatch: 0.12 CPU 0.18 WC
% SZS output end Solution for /tmp/SystemOnTPTP31727/SET893+1.tptp
% 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------