TSTP Solution File: SET893+1 by Prover9---1109a

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---1109a
% Problem  : SET893+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : tptp2X_and_run_prover9 %d %s

% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 04:33:13 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.77s 1.05s
% Output   : Refutation 0.77s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem  : SET893+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.03/0.13  % Command  : tptp2X_and_run_prover9 %d %s
% 0.12/0.34  % Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.34  % DateTime : Mon Jul 11 02:57:07 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.77/1.03  ============================== Prover9 ===============================
% 0.77/1.03  Prover9 (32) version 2009-11A, November 2009.
% 0.77/1.03  Process 11009 was started by sandbox on n004.cluster.edu,
% 0.77/1.03  Mon Jul 11 02:57:08 2022
% 0.77/1.03  The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/prover9 -t 300 -f /tmp/Prover9_10830_n004.cluster.edu".
% 0.77/1.03  ============================== end of head ===========================
% 0.77/1.03  
% 0.77/1.03  ============================== INPUT =================================
% 0.77/1.03  
% 0.77/1.03  % Reading from file /tmp/Prover9_10830_n004.cluster.edu
% 0.77/1.03  
% 0.77/1.03  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.77/1.03  set(auto2).
% 0.77/1.03      % set(auto2) -> set(auto).
% 0.77/1.03      % set(auto) -> set(auto_inference).
% 0.77/1.03      % set(auto) -> set(auto_setup).
% 0.77/1.03      % set(auto_setup) -> set(predicate_elim).
% 0.77/1.03      % set(auto_setup) -> assign(eq_defs, unfold).
% 0.77/1.03      % set(auto) -> set(auto_limits).
% 0.77/1.03      % set(auto_limits) -> assign(max_weight, "100.000").
% 0.77/1.03      % set(auto_limits) -> assign(sos_limit, 20000).
% 0.77/1.03      % set(auto) -> set(auto_denials).
% 0.77/1.03      % set(auto) -> set(auto_process).
% 0.77/1.03      % set(auto2) -> assign(new_constants, 1).
% 0.77/1.03      % set(auto2) -> assign(fold_denial_max, 3).
% 0.77/1.03      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_weight, "200.000").
% 0.77/1.03      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_hours, 1).
% 0.77/1.03      % assign(max_hours, 1) -> assign(max_seconds, 3600).
% 0.77/1.03      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_seconds, 0).
% 0.77/1.03      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_minutes, 5).
% 0.77/1.03      % assign(max_minutes, 5) -> assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.77/1.03      % set(auto2) -> set(sort_initial_sos).
% 0.77/1.03      % set(auto2) -> assign(sos_limit, -1).
% 0.77/1.03      % set(auto2) -> assign(lrs_ticks, 3000).
% 0.77/1.03      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_megs, 400).
% 0.77/1.03      % set(auto2) -> assign(stats, some).
% 0.77/1.03      % set(auto2) -> clear(echo_input).
% 0.77/1.03      % set(auto2) -> set(quiet).
% 0.77/1.03      % set(auto2) -> clear(print_initial_clauses).
% 0.77/1.03      % set(auto2) -> clear(print_given).
% 0.77/1.03  assign(lrs_ticks,-1).
% 0.77/1.03  assign(sos_limit,10000).
% 0.77/1.03  assign(order,kbo).
% 0.77/1.03  set(lex_order_vars).
% 0.77/1.03  clear(print_given).
% 0.77/1.03  
% 0.77/1.03  % formulas(sos).  % not echoed (9 formulas)
% 0.77/1.03  
% 0.77/1.03  ============================== end of input ==========================
% 0.77/1.03  
% 0.77/1.03  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.77/1.03  
% 0.77/1.03  ============================== PROCESS NON-CLAUSAL FORMULAS ==========
% 0.77/1.03  
% 0.77/1.03  % Formulas that are not ordinary clauses:
% 0.77/1.03  1 (all A all B (in(A,B) -> -in(B,A))) # label(antisymmetry_r2_hidden) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.77/1.03  2 (all A all B unordered_pair(A,B) = unordered_pair(B,A)) # label(commutativity_k2_tarski) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.77/1.03  3 (all A all B (B = singleton(A) <-> (all C (in(C,B) <-> C = A)))) # label(d1_tarski) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.77/1.03  4 (all A all B ordered_pair(A,B) = unordered_pair(unordered_pair(A,B),singleton(A))) # label(d5_tarski) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.77/1.03  5 (all A all B -empty(ordered_pair(A,B))) # label(fc1_zfmisc_1) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.77/1.03  6 (all A all B all C all D (in(ordered_pair(A,B),cartesian_product2(C,D)) <-> in(A,C) & in(B,D))) # label(l55_zfmisc_1) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.77/1.03  7 (exists A empty(A)) # label(rc1_xboole_0) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.77/1.03  8 (exists A -empty(A)) # label(rc2_xboole_0) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.77/1.03  9 -(all A all B all C all D (in(ordered_pair(A,B),cartesian_product2(singleton(C),singleton(D))) <-> A = C & B = D)) # label(t34_zfmisc_1) # label(negated_conjecture) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.77/1.03  
% 0.77/1.03  ============================== end of process non-clausal formulas ===
% 0.77/1.03  
% 0.77/1.03  ============================== PROCESS INITIAL CLAUSES ===============
% 0.77/1.03  
% 0.77/1.03  ============================== PREDICATE ELIMINATION =================
% 0.77/1.03  
% 0.77/1.03  ============================== end predicate elimination =============
% 0.77/1.03  
% 0.77/1.03  Auto_denials:  (non-Horn, no changes).
% 0.77/1.03  
% 0.77/1.03  Term ordering decisions:
% 0.77/1.03  
% 0.77/1.03  % Assigning unary symbol singleton kb_weight 0 and highest precedence (14).
% 0.77/1.03  Function symbol KB weights:  c1=1. c2=1. c3=1. c4=1. c5=1. c6=1. ordered_pair=1. cartesian_product2=1. unordered_pair=1. f1=1. singleton=0.
% 0.77/1.03  
% 0.77/1.03  ============================== end of process initial clauses ========
% 0.77/1.03  
% 0.77/1.03  ============================== CLAUSES FOR SEARCH ====================
% 0.77/1.03  
% 0.77/1.03  ============================== end of clauses for search =============
% 0.77/1.05  
% 0.77/1.05  ============================== SEARCH ================================
% 0.77/1.05  
% 0.77/1.05  % Starting search at 0.01 seconds.
% 0.77/1.05  
% 0.77/1.05  ============================== PROOF =================================
% 0.77/1.05  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.77/1.05  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.77/1.05  
% 0.77/1.05  % Proof 1 at 0.03 (+ 0.00) seconds.
% 0.77/1.05  % Length of proof is 35.
% 0.77/1.05  % Level of proof is 9.
% 0.77/1.05  % Maximum clause weight is 18.000.
% 0.77/1.05  % Given clauses 72.
% 0.77/1.05  
% 0.77/1.05  2 (all A all B unordered_pair(A,B) = unordered_pair(B,A)) # label(commutativity_k2_tarski) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.77/1.05  3 (all A all B (B = singleton(A) <-> (all C (in(C,B) <-> C = A)))) # label(d1_tarski) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.77/1.05  4 (all A all B ordered_pair(A,B) = unordered_pair(unordered_pair(A,B),singleton(A))) # label(d5_tarski) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.77/1.05  6 (all A all B all C all D (in(ordered_pair(A,B),cartesian_product2(C,D)) <-> in(A,C) & in(B,D))) # label(l55_zfmisc_1) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.77/1.05  9 -(all A all B all C all D (in(ordered_pair(A,B),cartesian_product2(singleton(C),singleton(D))) <-> A = C & B = D)) # label(t34_zfmisc_1) # label(negated_conjecture) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.77/1.05  11 unordered_pair(A,B) = unordered_pair(B,A) # label(commutativity_k2_tarski) # label(axiom).  [clausify(2)].
% 0.77/1.05  12 ordered_pair(A,B) = unordered_pair(unordered_pair(A,B),singleton(A)) # label(d5_tarski) # label(axiom).  [clausify(4)].
% 0.77/1.05  13 ordered_pair(A,B) = unordered_pair(singleton(A),unordered_pair(A,B)).  [copy(12),rewrite([11(4)])].
% 0.77/1.05  14 in(ordered_pair(c3,c4),cartesian_product2(singleton(c5),singleton(c6))) | c5 = c3 # label(t34_zfmisc_1) # label(negated_conjecture).  [clausify(9)].
% 0.77/1.05  15 in(unordered_pair(singleton(c3),unordered_pair(c3,c4)),cartesian_product2(singleton(c5),singleton(c6))) | c5 = c3.  [copy(14),rewrite([13(3)])].
% 0.77/1.05  16 in(ordered_pair(c3,c4),cartesian_product2(singleton(c5),singleton(c6))) | c6 = c4 # label(t34_zfmisc_1) # label(negated_conjecture).  [clausify(9)].
% 0.77/1.05  17 in(unordered_pair(singleton(c3),unordered_pair(c3,c4)),cartesian_product2(singleton(c5),singleton(c6))) | c6 = c4.  [copy(16),rewrite([13(3)])].
% 0.77/1.05  23 -in(ordered_pair(c3,c4),cartesian_product2(singleton(c5),singleton(c6))) | c5 != c3 | c6 != c4 # label(t34_zfmisc_1) # label(negated_conjecture).  [clausify(9)].
% 0.77/1.05  24 -in(unordered_pair(singleton(c3),unordered_pair(c3,c4)),cartesian_product2(singleton(c5),singleton(c6))) | c5 != c3 | c6 != c4.  [copy(23),rewrite([13(3)])].
% 0.77/1.05  25 singleton(A) != B | -in(C,B) | C = A # label(d1_tarski) # label(axiom).  [clausify(3)].
% 0.77/1.05  26 singleton(A) != B | in(C,B) | C != A # label(d1_tarski) # label(axiom).  [clausify(3)].
% 0.77/1.05  27 -in(ordered_pair(A,B),cartesian_product2(C,D)) | in(A,C) # label(l55_zfmisc_1) # label(axiom).  [clausify(6)].
% 0.77/1.05  28 -in(unordered_pair(singleton(A),unordered_pair(A,B)),cartesian_product2(C,D)) | in(A,C).  [copy(27),rewrite([13(1)])].
% 0.77/1.05  29 -in(ordered_pair(A,B),cartesian_product2(C,D)) | in(B,D) # label(l55_zfmisc_1) # label(axiom).  [clausify(6)].
% 0.77/1.05  30 -in(unordered_pair(singleton(A),unordered_pair(A,B)),cartesian_product2(C,D)) | in(B,D).  [copy(29),rewrite([13(1)])].
% 0.77/1.05  31 in(ordered_pair(A,B),cartesian_product2(C,D)) | -in(A,C) | -in(B,D) # label(l55_zfmisc_1) # label(axiom).  [clausify(6)].
% 0.77/1.05  32 in(unordered_pair(singleton(A),unordered_pair(A,B)),cartesian_product2(C,D)) | -in(A,C) | -in(B,D).  [copy(31),rewrite([13(1)])].
% 0.77/1.05  43 in(A,singleton(B)) | A != B.  [xx_res(26,a)].
% 0.77/1.05  48 in(c3,singleton(c5)) | c5 = c3.  [resolve(28,a,15,a)].
% 0.77/1.05  49 in(c4,singleton(c6)) | c6 = c4.  [resolve(30,a,17,a)].
% 0.77/1.05  76 in(A,singleton(A)).  [xx_res(43,b)].
% 0.77/1.05  78 in(unordered_pair(singleton(A),unordered_pair(A,B)),cartesian_product2(C,singleton(B))) | -in(A,C).  [resolve(76,a,32,c)].
% 0.77/1.05  101 c5 = c3 | singleton(c5) != singleton(A) | c3 = A.  [resolve(48,a,25,b),flip(b)].
% 0.77/1.05  106 c6 = c4 | singleton(c6) != singleton(A) | c4 = A.  [resolve(49,a,25,b),flip(b)].
% 0.77/1.05  154 c5 = c3.  [xx_res(101,b),flip(b),merge(b)].
% 0.77/1.05  162 -in(unordered_pair(singleton(c3),unordered_pair(c3,c4)),cartesian_product2(singleton(c3),singleton(c6))) | c6 != c4.  [back_rewrite(24),rewrite([154(7),154(13)]),xx(b)].
% 0.77/1.05  177 c6 = c4.  [xx_res(106,b),flip(b),merge(b)].
% 0.77/1.05  178 -in(unordered_pair(singleton(c3),unordered_pair(c3,c4)),cartesian_product2(singleton(c3),singleton(c4))).  [back_rewrite(162),rewrite([177(9),177(13)]),xx(b)].
% 0.77/1.05  188 in(unordered_pair(singleton(A),unordered_pair(A,B)),cartesian_product2(singleton(A),singleton(B))).  [resolve(78,b,76,a)].
% 0.77/1.05  189 $F.  [resolve(188,a,178,a)].
% 0.77/1.05  
% 0.77/1.05  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.77/1.05  ============================== end of proof ==========================
% 0.77/1.05  
% 0.77/1.05  ============================== STATISTICS ============================
% 0.77/1.05  
% 0.77/1.05  Given=72. Generated=432. Kept=171. proofs=1.
% 0.77/1.05  Usable=50. Sos=54. Demods=4. Limbo=1, Disabled=81. Hints=0.
% 0.77/1.05  Megabytes=0.21.
% 0.77/1.05  User_CPU=0.03, System_CPU=0.00, Wall_clock=0.
% 0.77/1.05  
% 0.77/1.05  ============================== end of statistics =====================
% 0.77/1.05  
% 0.77/1.05  ============================== end of search =========================
% 0.77/1.05  
% 0.77/1.05  THEOREM PROVED
% 0.77/1.05  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.77/1.05  
% 0.77/1.05  Exiting with 1 proof.
% 0.77/1.05  
% 0.77/1.05  Process 11009 exit (max_proofs) Mon Jul 11 02:57:08 2022
% 0.77/1.05  Prover9 interrupted
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------