TSTP Solution File: SET890+1 by Vampire-SAT---4.8

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Vampire-SAT---4.8
% Problem  : SET890+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : vampire --mode casc_sat -m 16384 --cores 7 -t %d %s

% Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun May  5 09:19:37 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 0.16s 0.51s
% Output   : Refutation 0.16s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   12
%            Number of leaves      :   10
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   49 (  15 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  172 (  38 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   10 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  196 (  73   ~;  74   |;  34   &)
%                                         (  11 <=>;   4  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    9 (   5 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    6 (   4 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   1 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   97 (  84   !;  13   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f7799,plain,
    $false,
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f7730,f6284]) ).

fof(f6284,plain,
    ~ in(sK6(singleton(sK3),sK3),sK3),
    inference(unit_resulting_resolution,[],[f92,f4170,f67]) ).

fof(f67,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ sP1(X0,sK6(X0,X1))
      | sP2(X0,X1)
      | ~ in(sK6(X0,X1),X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f38]) ).

fof(f38,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ( sP2(X0,X1)
        | ( ( ~ sP1(X0,sK6(X0,X1))
            | ~ in(sK6(X0,X1),X1) )
          & ( sP1(X0,sK6(X0,X1))
            | in(sK6(X0,X1),X1) ) ) )
      & ( ! [X3] :
            ( ( in(X3,X1)
              | ~ sP1(X0,X3) )
            & ( sP1(X0,X3)
              | ~ in(X3,X1) ) )
        | ~ sP2(X0,X1) ) ),
    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK6])],[f36,f37]) ).

fof(f37,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ? [X2] :
          ( ( ~ sP1(X0,X2)
            | ~ in(X2,X1) )
          & ( sP1(X0,X2)
            | in(X2,X1) ) )
     => ( ( ~ sP1(X0,sK6(X0,X1))
          | ~ in(sK6(X0,X1),X1) )
        & ( sP1(X0,sK6(X0,X1))
          | in(sK6(X0,X1),X1) ) ) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

fof(f36,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ( sP2(X0,X1)
        | ? [X2] :
            ( ( ~ sP1(X0,X2)
              | ~ in(X2,X1) )
            & ( sP1(X0,X2)
              | in(X2,X1) ) ) )
      & ( ! [X3] :
            ( ( in(X3,X1)
              | ~ sP1(X0,X3) )
            & ( sP1(X0,X3)
              | ~ in(X3,X1) ) )
        | ~ sP2(X0,X1) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f35]) ).

fof(f35,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ( sP2(X0,X1)
        | ? [X2] :
            ( ( ~ sP1(X0,X2)
              | ~ in(X2,X1) )
            & ( sP1(X0,X2)
              | in(X2,X1) ) ) )
      & ( ! [X2] :
            ( ( in(X2,X1)
              | ~ sP1(X0,X2) )
            & ( sP1(X0,X2)
              | ~ in(X2,X1) ) )
        | ~ sP2(X0,X1) ) ),
    inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f20]) ).

fof(f20,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( sP2(X0,X1)
    <=> ! [X2] :
          ( in(X2,X1)
        <=> sP1(X0,X2) ) ),
    introduced(predicate_definition_introduction,[new_symbols(naming,[sP2])]) ).

fof(f4170,plain,
    sP1(singleton(sK3),sK6(singleton(sK3),sK3)),
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f4157,f644]) ).

fof(f644,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ in(X1,X0)
      | sP1(singleton(X0),X1) ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f70,f81]) ).

fof(f81,plain,
    ! [X0] : in(X0,singleton(X0)),
    inference(unit_resulting_resolution,[],[f78,f77]) ).

fof(f77,plain,
    ! [X3,X1] :
      ( ~ sP0(X3,X1)
      | in(X3,X1) ),
    inference(equality_resolution,[],[f59]) ).

fof(f59,plain,
    ! [X3,X0,X1] :
      ( in(X3,X1)
      | X0 != X3
      | ~ sP0(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f33]) ).

fof(f33,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ( sP0(X0,X1)
        | ( ( sK5(X0,X1) != X0
            | ~ in(sK5(X0,X1),X1) )
          & ( sK5(X0,X1) = X0
            | in(sK5(X0,X1),X1) ) ) )
      & ( ! [X3] :
            ( ( in(X3,X1)
              | X0 != X3 )
            & ( X0 = X3
              | ~ in(X3,X1) ) )
        | ~ sP0(X0,X1) ) ),
    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK5])],[f31,f32]) ).

fof(f32,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ? [X2] :
          ( ( X0 != X2
            | ~ in(X2,X1) )
          & ( X0 = X2
            | in(X2,X1) ) )
     => ( ( sK5(X0,X1) != X0
          | ~ in(sK5(X0,X1),X1) )
        & ( sK5(X0,X1) = X0
          | in(sK5(X0,X1),X1) ) ) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

fof(f31,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ( sP0(X0,X1)
        | ? [X2] :
            ( ( X0 != X2
              | ~ in(X2,X1) )
            & ( X0 = X2
              | in(X2,X1) ) ) )
      & ( ! [X3] :
            ( ( in(X3,X1)
              | X0 != X3 )
            & ( X0 = X3
              | ~ in(X3,X1) ) )
        | ~ sP0(X0,X1) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f30]) ).

fof(f30,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ( sP0(X0,X1)
        | ? [X2] :
            ( ( X0 != X2
              | ~ in(X2,X1) )
            & ( X0 = X2
              | in(X2,X1) ) ) )
      & ( ! [X2] :
            ( ( in(X2,X1)
              | X0 != X2 )
            & ( X0 = X2
              | ~ in(X2,X1) ) )
        | ~ sP0(X0,X1) ) ),
    inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f17]) ).

fof(f17,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( sP0(X0,X1)
    <=> ! [X2] :
          ( in(X2,X1)
        <=> X0 = X2 ) ),
    introduced(predicate_definition_introduction,[new_symbols(naming,[sP0])]) ).

fof(f78,plain,
    ! [X0] : sP0(X0,singleton(X0)),
    inference(equality_resolution,[],[f62]) ).

fof(f62,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( sP0(X0,X1)
      | singleton(X0) != X1 ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f34]) ).

fof(f34,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ( singleton(X0) = X1
        | ~ sP0(X0,X1) )
      & ( sP0(X0,X1)
        | singleton(X0) != X1 ) ),
    inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f18]) ).

fof(f18,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( singleton(X0) = X1
    <=> sP0(X0,X1) ),
    inference(definition_folding,[],[f3,f17]) ).

fof(f3,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( singleton(X0) = X1
    <=> ! [X2] :
          ( in(X2,X1)
        <=> X0 = X2 ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d1_tarski) ).

fof(f70,plain,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] :
      ( ~ in(X2,X0)
      | sP1(X0,X1)
      | ~ in(X1,X2) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f42]) ).

fof(f42,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ( sP1(X0,X1)
        | ! [X2] :
            ( ~ in(X2,X0)
            | ~ in(X1,X2) ) )
      & ( ( in(sK7(X0,X1),X0)
          & in(X1,sK7(X0,X1)) )
        | ~ sP1(X0,X1) ) ),
    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK7])],[f40,f41]) ).

fof(f41,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ? [X3] :
          ( in(X3,X0)
          & in(X1,X3) )
     => ( in(sK7(X0,X1),X0)
        & in(X1,sK7(X0,X1)) ) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

fof(f40,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ( sP1(X0,X1)
        | ! [X2] :
            ( ~ in(X2,X0)
            | ~ in(X1,X2) ) )
      & ( ? [X3] :
            ( in(X3,X0)
            & in(X1,X3) )
        | ~ sP1(X0,X1) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f39]) ).

fof(f39,plain,
    ! [X0,X2] :
      ( ( sP1(X0,X2)
        | ! [X3] :
            ( ~ in(X3,X0)
            | ~ in(X2,X3) ) )
      & ( ? [X3] :
            ( in(X3,X0)
            & in(X2,X3) )
        | ~ sP1(X0,X2) ) ),
    inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f19]) ).

fof(f19,plain,
    ! [X0,X2] :
      ( sP1(X0,X2)
    <=> ? [X3] :
          ( in(X3,X0)
          & in(X2,X3) ) ),
    introduced(predicate_definition_introduction,[new_symbols(naming,[sP1])]) ).

fof(f4157,plain,
    ( sP1(singleton(sK3),sK6(singleton(sK3),sK3))
    | in(sK6(singleton(sK3),sK3),sK3) ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f66,f92]) ).

fof(f66,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( sP2(X0,X1)
      | sP1(X0,sK6(X0,X1))
      | in(sK6(X0,X1),X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f38]) ).

fof(f92,plain,
    ~ sP2(singleton(sK3),sK3),
    inference(unit_resulting_resolution,[],[f48,f72]) ).

fof(f72,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ sP2(X0,X1)
      | union(X0) = X1 ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f43]) ).

fof(f43,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ( union(X0) = X1
        | ~ sP2(X0,X1) )
      & ( sP2(X0,X1)
        | union(X0) != X1 ) ),
    inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f21]) ).

fof(f21,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( union(X0) = X1
    <=> sP2(X0,X1) ),
    inference(definition_folding,[],[f5,f20,f19]) ).

fof(f5,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( union(X0) = X1
    <=> ! [X2] :
          ( in(X2,X1)
        <=> ? [X3] :
              ( in(X3,X0)
              & in(X2,X3) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d4_tarski) ).

fof(f48,plain,
    sK3 != union(singleton(sK3)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f23]) ).

fof(f23,plain,
    sK3 != union(singleton(sK3)),
    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK3])],[f13,f22]) ).

fof(f22,plain,
    ( ? [X0] : union(singleton(X0)) != X0
   => sK3 != union(singleton(sK3)) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

fof(f13,plain,
    ? [X0] : union(singleton(X0)) != X0,
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f11]) ).

fof(f11,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X0] : union(singleton(X0)) = X0,
    inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f10]) ).

fof(f10,conjecture,
    ! [X0] : union(singleton(X0)) = X0,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t31_zfmisc_1) ).

fof(f7730,plain,
    in(sK6(singleton(sK3),sK3),sK3),
    inference(superposition,[],[f4174,f4335]) ).

fof(f4335,plain,
    sK3 = sK7(singleton(sK3),sK6(singleton(sK3),sK3)),
    inference(unit_resulting_resolution,[],[f78,f4173,f58]) ).

fof(f58,plain,
    ! [X3,X0,X1] :
      ( ~ sP0(X0,X1)
      | ~ in(X3,X1)
      | X0 = X3 ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f33]) ).

fof(f4173,plain,
    in(sK7(singleton(sK3),sK6(singleton(sK3),sK3)),singleton(sK3)),
    inference(unit_resulting_resolution,[],[f4170,f69]) ).

fof(f69,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ sP1(X0,X1)
      | in(sK7(X0,X1),X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f42]) ).

fof(f4174,plain,
    in(sK6(singleton(sK3),sK3),sK7(singleton(sK3),sK6(singleton(sK3),sK3))),
    inference(unit_resulting_resolution,[],[f4170,f68]) ).

fof(f68,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ sP1(X0,X1)
      | in(X1,sK7(X0,X1)) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f42]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.10  % Problem    : SET890+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.10/0.11  % Command    : vampire --mode casc_sat -m 16384 --cores 7 -t %d %s
% 0.11/0.31  % Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.31  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.31  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.31  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.31  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.31  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.11/0.31  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.11/0.31  % DateTime   : Fri May  3 17:05:08 EDT 2024
% 0.16/0.31  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.16/0.31  % (23969)Running in auto input_syntax mode. Trying TPTP
% 0.16/0.33  % (23972)WARNING: value z3 for option sas not known
% 0.16/0.33  % (23975)ott-10_8_av=off:bd=preordered:bs=on:fsd=off:fsr=off:fde=unused:irw=on:lcm=predicate:lma=on:nm=4:nwc=1.7:sp=frequency_522 on theBenchmark for (522ds/0Mi)
% 0.16/0.33  % (23973)fmb+10_1_bce=on:fmbsr=1.5:nm=32_533 on theBenchmark for (533ds/0Mi)
% 0.16/0.33  % (23970)fmb+10_1_bce=on:fmbas=function:fmbsr=1.2:fde=unused:nm=0_846 on theBenchmark for (846ds/0Mi)
% 0.16/0.33  % (23971)fmb+10_1_bce=on:fmbdsb=on:fmbes=contour:fmbswr=3:fde=none:nm=0_793 on theBenchmark for (793ds/0Mi)
% 0.16/0.33  % (23974)ott+10_10:1_add=off:afr=on:amm=off:anc=all:bd=off:bs=on:fsr=off:irw=on:lma=on:msp=off:nm=4:nwc=4.0:sac=on:sp=reverse_frequency_531 on theBenchmark for (531ds/0Mi)
% 0.16/0.33  % (23976)ott+1_64_av=off:bd=off:bce=on:fsd=off:fde=unused:gsp=on:irw=on:lcm=predicate:lma=on:nm=2:nwc=1.1:sims=off:urr=on_497 on theBenchmark for (497ds/0Mi)
% 0.16/0.33  % (23972)dis+2_11_add=large:afr=on:amm=off:bd=off:bce=on:fsd=off:fde=none:gs=on:gsaa=full_model:gsem=off:irw=on:msp=off:nm=4:nwc=1.3:sas=z3:sims=off:sac=on:sp=reverse_arity_569 on theBenchmark for (569ds/0Mi)
% 0.16/0.33  TRYING [1]
% 0.16/0.33  TRYING [2]
% 0.16/0.33  TRYING [3]
% 0.16/0.34  TRYING [1]
% 0.16/0.34  TRYING [4]
% 0.16/0.34  TRYING [2]
% 0.16/0.34  TRYING [3]
% 0.16/0.34  TRYING [5]
% 0.16/0.36  TRYING [6]
% 0.16/0.36  TRYING [1]
% 0.16/0.36  TRYING [4]
% 0.16/0.36  TRYING [2]
% 0.16/0.36  TRYING [3]
% 0.16/0.37  TRYING [4]
% 0.16/0.37  TRYING [7]
% 0.16/0.38  TRYING [5]
% 0.16/0.40  TRYING [6]
% 0.16/0.40  TRYING [5]
% 0.16/0.42  TRYING [8]
% 0.16/0.43  TRYING [7]
% 0.16/0.48  TRYING [9]
% 0.16/0.49  TRYING [8]
% 0.16/0.50  TRYING [6]
% 0.16/0.50  % (23976)First to succeed.
% 0.16/0.50  % (23976)Solution written to "/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/vampire-proof-23969"
% 0.16/0.51  % (23976)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.16/0.51  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.16/0.51  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.16/0.51  % (23976)------------------------------
% 0.16/0.51  % (23976)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.16/0.51  % (23976)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.16/0.51  
% 0.16/0.51  % (23976)Memory used [KB]: 3135
% 0.16/0.51  % (23976)Time elapsed: 0.175 s
% 0.16/0.51  % (23976)Instructions burned: 377 (million)
% 0.16/0.51  % (23969)Success in time 0.177 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------