TSTP Solution File: SET890+1 by SPASS---3.9

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SPASS---3.9
% Problem  : SET890+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : run_spass %d %s

% Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 05:29:36 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.19s 0.55s
% Output   : Refutation 0.19s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.12  % Problem  : SET890+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.13/0.13  % Command  : run_spass %d %s
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Mon Jul 11 09:40:13 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.19/0.55  
% 0.19/0.55  SPASS V 3.9 
% 0.19/0.55  SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 0.19/0.55  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.19/0.55  Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 
% 0.19/0.55  SPASS derived 550 clauses, backtracked 12 clauses, performed 2 splits and kept 382 clauses.
% 0.19/0.55  SPASS allocated 85805 KBytes.
% 0.19/0.55  SPASS spent	0:00:00.20 on the problem.
% 0.19/0.55  		0:00:00.04 for the input.
% 0.19/0.55  		0:00:00.04 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 0.19/0.55  		0:00:00.01 for inferences.
% 0.19/0.55  		0:00:00.00 for the backtracking.
% 0.19/0.55  		0:00:00.08 for the reduction.
% 0.19/0.55  
% 0.19/0.55  
% 0.19/0.55  Here is a proof with depth 4, length 25 :
% 0.19/0.55  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.19/0.55  5[0:Inp] || equal(union(singleton(skc3)),skc3)** -> .
% 0.19/0.55  8[0:Inp] ||  -> in(skf9(u,v),skf10(v,u))*.
% 0.19/0.55  15[0:Inp] || in(u,v)* equal(v,singleton(w))*+ -> equal(u,w)*.
% 0.19/0.55  16[0:Inp] || equal(u,v)* equal(w,singleton(v))*+ -> in(u,w)*.
% 0.19/0.55  19[0:Inp] ||  -> equal(u,union(v)) in(skf10(u,v),v)* in(skf9(v,u),u)*.
% 0.19/0.55  22[0:Inp] || in(u,v) in(skf9(v,w),u)*+ in(skf9(v,w),w)* -> equal(w,union(v)).
% 0.19/0.55  27[0:Res:22.3,5.0] || in(u,singleton(skc3)) in(skf9(singleton(skc3),skc3),u)* in(skf9(singleton(skc3),skc3),skc3)* -> .
% 0.19/0.55  28[0:Res:19.2,5.0] ||  -> in(skf10(skc3,singleton(skc3)),singleton(skc3))* in(skf9(singleton(skc3),skc3),skc3).
% 0.19/0.55  44[0:EqR:16.1] || equal(u,v) -> in(u,singleton(v))*.
% 0.19/0.55  53[0:EqR:15.1] || in(u,singleton(v))* -> equal(u,v).
% 0.19/0.55  311[0:Res:28.0,53.0] ||  -> in(skf9(singleton(skc3),skc3),skc3)* equal(skf10(skc3,singleton(skc3)),skc3).
% 0.19/0.55  312[0:Rew:311.1,28.0] ||  -> in(skc3,singleton(skc3)) in(skf9(singleton(skc3),skc3),skc3)*.
% 0.19/0.55  316[1:Spt:312.0] ||  -> in(skc3,singleton(skc3))*.
% 0.19/0.55  551[2:Spt:311.0] ||  -> in(skf9(singleton(skc3),skc3),skc3)*.
% 0.19/0.55  552[2:MRR:27.2,551.0] || in(u,singleton(skc3)) in(skf9(singleton(skc3),skc3),u)* -> .
% 0.19/0.55  578[2:Res:551.0,552.1] || in(skc3,singleton(skc3))* -> .
% 0.19/0.55  579[2:MRR:578.0,316.0] ||  -> .
% 0.19/0.55  581[2:Spt:579.0,311.0,551.0] || in(skf9(singleton(skc3),skc3),skc3)* -> .
% 0.19/0.55  582[2:Spt:579.0,311.1] ||  -> equal(skf10(skc3,singleton(skc3)),skc3)**.
% 0.19/0.55  584[2:SpR:582.0,8.0] ||  -> in(skf9(singleton(skc3),skc3),skc3)*.
% 0.19/0.55  594[2:MRR:584.0,581.0] ||  -> .
% 0.19/0.55  596[1:Spt:594.0,312.0,316.0] || in(skc3,singleton(skc3))* -> .
% 0.19/0.55  597[1:Spt:594.0,312.1] ||  -> in(skf9(singleton(skc3),skc3),skc3)*.
% 0.19/0.55  607[1:Res:44.1,596.0] || equal(skc3,skc3)* -> .
% 0.19/0.55  608[1:Obv:607.0] ||  -> .
% 0.19/0.55  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.19/0.55  Formulae used in the proof : t31_zfmisc_1 d4_tarski reflexivity_r1_tarski d10_xboole_0 d1_tarski
% 0.19/0.55  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------