TSTP Solution File: SET886+1 by E-SAT---3.1.00

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E-SAT---3.1.00
% Problem  : SET886+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sat May  4 09:24:38 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 0.20s 0.49s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.20s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   22 (  14 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   30 (  19 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   17 (   9   ~;   4   |;   1   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   3  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    6 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   30 (   3 sgn  18   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(t27_zfmisc_1,conjecture,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( subset(unordered_pair(X1,X2),singleton(X3))
     => unordered_pair(X1,X2) = singleton(X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.wTgIdySpSV/E---3.1_19766.p',t27_zfmisc_1) ).

fof(t26_zfmisc_1,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( subset(unordered_pair(X1,X2),singleton(X3))
     => X1 = X3 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.wTgIdySpSV/E---3.1_19766.p',t26_zfmisc_1) ).

fof(t69_enumset1,axiom,
    ! [X1] : unordered_pair(X1,X1) = singleton(X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.wTgIdySpSV/E---3.1_19766.p',t69_enumset1) ).

fof(commutativity_k2_tarski,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] : unordered_pair(X1,X2) = unordered_pair(X2,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.wTgIdySpSV/E---3.1_19766.p',commutativity_k2_tarski) ).

fof(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1,X2,X3] :
        ( subset(unordered_pair(X1,X2),singleton(X3))
       => unordered_pair(X1,X2) = singleton(X3) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[t27_zfmisc_1]) ).

fof(c_0_5,plain,
    ! [X7,X8,X9] :
      ( ~ subset(unordered_pair(X7,X8),singleton(X9))
      | X7 = X9 ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t26_zfmisc_1])])]) ).

fof(c_0_6,plain,
    ! [X10] : unordered_pair(X10,X10) = singleton(X10),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[t69_enumset1]) ).

fof(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
    ( subset(unordered_pair(esk1_0,esk2_0),singleton(esk3_0))
    & unordered_pair(esk1_0,esk2_0) != singleton(esk3_0) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_8,plain,
    ( X1 = X3
    | ~ subset(unordered_pair(X1,X2),singleton(X3)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,plain,
    unordered_pair(X1,X1) = singleton(X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
    subset(unordered_pair(esk1_0,esk2_0),singleton(esk3_0)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

fof(c_0_11,plain,
    ! [X11,X12] : unordered_pair(X11,X12) = unordered_pair(X12,X11),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[commutativity_k2_tarski]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
    unordered_pair(esk1_0,esk2_0) != singleton(esk3_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    ( X1 = X2
    | ~ subset(unordered_pair(X1,X3),unordered_pair(X2,X2)) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
    subset(unordered_pair(esk1_0,esk2_0),unordered_pair(esk3_0,esk3_0)),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    unordered_pair(X1,X2) = unordered_pair(X2,X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
    unordered_pair(esk3_0,esk3_0) != unordered_pair(esk1_0,esk2_0),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
    esk3_0 = esk1_0,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    ( X1 = X2
    | ~ subset(unordered_pair(X3,X1),unordered_pair(X2,X2)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
    unordered_pair(esk1_0,esk2_0) != unordered_pair(esk1_0,esk1_0),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]),c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
    esk2_0 = esk1_0,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_14]),c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem    : SET886+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.03/0.13  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime   : Fri May  3 09:56:51 EDT 2024
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.20/0.47  Running first-order model finding
% 0.20/0.47  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.wTgIdySpSV/E---3.1_19766.p
% 0.20/0.49  # Version: 3.1.0
% 0.20/0.49  # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.49  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.49  # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/0.49  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.49  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.49  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.49  # new_bool_3 with pid 19913 completed with status 0
% 0.20/0.49  # Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.20/0.49  # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.49  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.49  # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/0.49  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.49  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.20/0.49  # Search class: FHUSS-FFSF21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.20/0.49  # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.20/0.49  # Starting G-E--_107_B00_00_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_PS_S071I with 181s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.49  # G-E--_107_B00_00_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_PS_S071I with pid 19916 completed with status 0
% 0.20/0.49  # Result found by G-E--_107_B00_00_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_PS_S071I
% 0.20/0.49  # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.49  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.49  # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/0.49  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.49  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.20/0.49  # Search class: FHUSS-FFSF21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.20/0.49  # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.20/0.49  # Starting G-E--_107_B00_00_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_PS_S071I with 181s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.49  # Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 0.20/0.49  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.20/0.49  
% 0.20/0.49  # Proof found!
% 0.20/0.49  # SZS status Theorem
% 0.20/0.49  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.20/0.49  # Parsed axioms                        : 7
% 0.20/0.49  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 2
% 0.20/0.49  # Initial clauses                      : 6
% 0.20/0.49  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.20/0.49  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 6
% 0.20/0.49  # Processed clauses                    : 20
% 0.20/0.49  # ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 0.20/0.49  # ...subsumed                          : 2
% 0.20/0.49  # ...remaining for further processing  : 18
% 0.20/0.49  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.20/0.49  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.20/0.49  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.20/0.49  # Backward-rewritten                   : 3
% 0.20/0.49  # Generated clauses                    : 20
% 0.20/0.49  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 16
% 0.20/0.49  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.20/0.49  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.20/0.49  # Paramodulations                      : 20
% 0.20/0.49  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.20/0.49  # NegExts                              : 0
% 0.20/0.49  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.20/0.49  # Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.20/0.49  # Total rewrite steps                  : 11
% 0.20/0.49  # ...of those cached                   : 5
% 0.20/0.49  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.20/0.49  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.20/0.49  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.20/0.49  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.20/0.49  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.20/0.49  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.20/0.49  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.20/0.49  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.20/0.49  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.20/0.49  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.20/0.49  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.20/0.49  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.20/0.49  # Current number of processed clauses  : 9
% 0.20/0.49  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 6
% 0.20/0.49  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 1
% 0.20/0.49  #    Negative unit clauses             : 0
% 0.20/0.49  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 2
% 0.20/0.49  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 6
% 0.20/0.49  # ...number of literals in the above   : 11
% 0.20/0.49  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.20/0.49  # Current number of archived clauses   : 9
% 0.20/0.49  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 4
% 0.20/0.49  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 4
% 0.20/0.49  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 2
% 0.20/0.49  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1
% 0.20/0.49  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.20/0.49  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 15
% 0.20/0.49  # BW rewrite match successes           : 15
% 0.20/0.49  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.20/0.49  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.20/0.49  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 409
% 0.20/0.49  # Search garbage collected termcells   : 50
% 0.20/0.49  
% 0.20/0.49  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.49  # User time                : 0.002 s
% 0.20/0.49  # System time              : 0.003 s
% 0.20/0.49  # Total time               : 0.006 s
% 0.20/0.49  # Maximum resident set size: 1604 pages
% 0.20/0.49  
% 0.20/0.49  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.49  # User time                : 0.004 s
% 0.20/0.49  # System time              : 0.005 s
% 0.20/0.49  # Total time               : 0.009 s
% 0.20/0.49  # Maximum resident set size: 1692 pages
% 0.20/0.49  % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------