TSTP Solution File: SET873+1 by ET---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : ET---2.0
% Problem : SET873+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_ET %s %d
% Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 00:55:08 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.23s 1.42s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.23s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 21 ( 10 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 44 ( 25 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 12 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 38 ( 15 ~; 14 |; 4 &)
% ( 2 <=>; 3 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 13 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 2 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 35 ( 4 sgn 24 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(l21_zfmisc_1,axiom,
! [X1,X2] :
( subset(set_union2(singleton(X1),X2),X2)
=> in(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',l21_zfmisc_1) ).
fof(commutativity_k2_xboole_0,axiom,
! [X1,X2] : set_union2(X1,X2) = set_union2(X2,X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',commutativity_k2_xboole_0) ).
fof(t13_zfmisc_1,conjecture,
! [X1,X2] :
( set_union2(singleton(X1),singleton(X2)) = singleton(X1)
=> X1 = X2 ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',t13_zfmisc_1) ).
fof(reflexivity_r1_tarski,axiom,
! [X1,X2] : subset(X1,X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',reflexivity_r1_tarski) ).
fof(d1_tarski,axiom,
! [X1,X2] :
( X2 = singleton(X1)
<=> ! [X3] :
( in(X3,X2)
<=> X3 = X1 ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',d1_tarski) ).
fof(c_0_5,plain,
! [X3,X4] :
( ~ subset(set_union2(singleton(X3),X4),X4)
| in(X3,X4) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[l21_zfmisc_1])]) ).
fof(c_0_6,plain,
! [X3,X4] : set_union2(X3,X4) = set_union2(X4,X3),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[commutativity_k2_xboole_0]) ).
fof(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X1,X2] :
( set_union2(singleton(X1),singleton(X2)) = singleton(X1)
=> X1 = X2 ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[t13_zfmisc_1]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
( in(X1,X2)
| ~ subset(set_union2(singleton(X1),X2),X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
set_union2(X1,X2) = set_union2(X2,X1),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
fof(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
( set_union2(singleton(esk4_0),singleton(esk5_0)) = singleton(esk4_0)
& esk4_0 != esk5_0 ),
inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_7])])]) ).
fof(c_0_11,plain,
! [X3] : subset(X3,X3),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[reflexivity_r1_tarski])]) ).
fof(c_0_12,plain,
! [X4,X5,X6,X6,X4,X5] :
( ( ~ in(X6,X5)
| X6 = X4
| X5 != singleton(X4) )
& ( X6 != X4
| in(X6,X5)
| X5 != singleton(X4) )
& ( ~ in(esk1_2(X4,X5),X5)
| esk1_2(X4,X5) != X4
| X5 = singleton(X4) )
& ( in(esk1_2(X4,X5),X5)
| esk1_2(X4,X5) = X4
| X5 = singleton(X4) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[d1_tarski])])])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
( in(X1,X2)
| ~ subset(set_union2(X2,singleton(X1)),X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
set_union2(singleton(esk4_0),singleton(esk5_0)) = singleton(esk4_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
subset(X1,X1),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
( X3 = X2
| X1 != singleton(X2)
| ~ in(X3,X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
in(esk5_0,singleton(esk4_0)),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]),c_0_15])]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
( X1 = esk5_0
| singleton(esk4_0) != singleton(X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
esk4_0 != esk5_0,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_18]),c_0_19]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : SET873+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.03/0.13 % Command : run_ET %s %d
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Sat Jul 9 20:16:15 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.23/1.42 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_4a02c828a8cc55752123edbcc1ad40e453c11447 for 23 seconds:
% 0.23/1.42 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.4,,04,100,1.0)
% 0.23/1.42 # Preprocessing time : 0.014 s
% 0.23/1.42
% 0.23/1.42 # Failure: Out of unprocessed clauses!
% 0.23/1.42 # OLD status GaveUp
% 0.23/1.42 # Parsed axioms : 11
% 0.23/1.42 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 6
% 0.23/1.42 # Initial clauses : 9
% 0.23/1.42 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # Initial clauses in saturation : 9
% 0.23/1.42 # Processed clauses : 36
% 0.23/1.42 # ...of these trivial : 1
% 0.23/1.42 # ...subsumed : 10
% 0.23/1.42 # ...remaining for further processing : 25
% 0.23/1.42 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 5
% 0.23/1.42 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # Backward-rewritten : 1
% 0.23/1.42 # Generated clauses : 38
% 0.23/1.42 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 27
% 0.23/1.42 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 12
% 0.23/1.42 # Paramodulations : 27
% 0.23/1.42 # Factorizations : 2
% 0.23/1.42 # Equation resolutions : 9
% 0.23/1.42 # Current number of processed clauses : 23
% 0.23/1.42 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 2
% 0.23/1.42 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 1
% 0.23/1.42 # Negative unit clauses : 2
% 0.23/1.42 # Non-unit-clauses : 18
% 0.23/1.42 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.23/1.42 # ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # Current number of archived clauses : 1
% 0.23/1.42 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 182
% 0.23/1.42 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 151
% 0.23/1.42 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 19
% 0.23/1.42 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 3
% 0.23/1.42 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # BW rewrite match attempts : 4
% 0.23/1.42 # BW rewrite match successes : 4
% 0.23/1.42 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # Termbank termtop insertions : 898
% 0.23/1.42
% 0.23/1.42 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.23/1.42 # User time : 0.013 s
% 0.23/1.42 # System time : 0.002 s
% 0.23/1.42 # Total time : 0.015 s
% 0.23/1.42 # Maximum resident set size: 2772 pages
% 0.23/1.42 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_f171197f65f27d1ba69648a20c844832c84a5dd7 for 23 seconds:
% 0.23/1.42 # Preprocessing time : 0.014 s
% 0.23/1.42
% 0.23/1.42 # Proof found!
% 0.23/1.42 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.23/1.42 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.23/1.42 # Proof object total steps : 21
% 0.23/1.42 # Proof object clause steps : 10
% 0.23/1.42 # Proof object formula steps : 11
% 0.23/1.42 # Proof object conjectures : 8
% 0.23/1.42 # Proof object clause conjectures : 5
% 0.23/1.42 # Proof object formula conjectures : 3
% 0.23/1.42 # Proof object initial clauses used : 6
% 0.23/1.42 # Proof object initial formulas used : 5
% 0.23/1.42 # Proof object generating inferences : 4
% 0.23/1.42 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 3
% 0.23/1.42 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.23/1.42 # Parsed axioms : 11
% 0.23/1.42 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # Initial clauses : 15
% 0.23/1.42 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # Initial clauses in saturation : 15
% 0.23/1.42 # Processed clauses : 35
% 0.23/1.42 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # ...subsumed : 6
% 0.23/1.42 # ...remaining for further processing : 29
% 0.23/1.42 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 1
% 0.23/1.42 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # Generated clauses : 38
% 0.23/1.42 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 29
% 0.23/1.42 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # Paramodulations : 34
% 0.23/1.42 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # Equation resolutions : 4
% 0.23/1.42 # Current number of processed clauses : 28
% 0.23/1.42 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 6
% 0.23/1.42 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 1
% 0.23/1.42 # Negative unit clauses : 6
% 0.23/1.42 # Non-unit-clauses : 15
% 0.23/1.42 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 9
% 0.23/1.42 # ...number of literals in the above : 24
% 0.23/1.42 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 18
% 0.23/1.42 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 18
% 0.23/1.42 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 3
% 0.23/1.42 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 11
% 0.23/1.42 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # BW rewrite match attempts : 11
% 0.23/1.42 # BW rewrite match successes : 10
% 0.23/1.42 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # Termbank termtop insertions : 959
% 0.23/1.42
% 0.23/1.42 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.23/1.42 # User time : 0.013 s
% 0.23/1.42 # System time : 0.002 s
% 0.23/1.42 # Total time : 0.015 s
% 0.23/1.42 # Maximum resident set size: 2772 pages
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------