TSTP Solution File: SET857-2 by SNARK---20120808r022

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SNARK---20120808r022
% Problem  : SET857-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run-snark %s %d

% Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 05:12:54 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 1.07s 1.27s
% Output   : Refutation 1.07s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   11
%            Number of leaves      :   14
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   35 (  18 unt;  15 nHn;  32 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   73 (  12 equ;  23 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   10 (  10 usr;   5 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   33 (   3 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_Set_OsubsetD_0,axiom,
    ( ~ c_in(X,Y,Z)
    | ~ c_lessequals(Y,U,tc_set(Z))
    | c_in(X,U,Z) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Set_OsubsetD_0) ).

cnf(cls_Set_OsubsetI_0,axiom,
    ( c_in(c_Main_OsubsetI__1(X,Y,Z),X,Z)
    | c_lessequals(X,Y,tc_set(Z)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Set_OsubsetI_0) ).

cnf(cls_Set_OsubsetI_1,axiom,
    ( ~ c_in(c_Main_OsubsetI__1(X,Y,Z),Y,Z)
    | c_lessequals(X,Y,tc_set(Z)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Set_OsubsetI_1) ).

cnf(cls_Zorn_OAbrial__axiom1_0,axiom,
    c_lessequals(X,c_Zorn_Osucc(Y,X,Z),tc_set(tc_set(Z))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Zorn_OAbrial__axiom1_0) ).

cnf(cls_Zorn_OTFin__linear__lemma1_0,axiom,
    ( ~ c_in(X,c_Zorn_OTFin(Y,Z),tc_set(tc_set(Z)))
    | ~ c_in(U,c_Zorn_OTFin(Y,Z),tc_set(tc_set(Z)))
    | c_in(c_Zorn_OTFin__linear__lemma1__1(Y,X,Z),c_Zorn_OTFin(Y,Z),tc_set(tc_set(Z)))
    | c_lessequals(U,X,tc_set(tc_set(Z)))
    | c_lessequals(c_Zorn_Osucc(Y,X,Z),U,tc_set(tc_set(Z))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Zorn_OTFin__linear__lemma1_0) ).

cnf(cls_Zorn_OTFin__linear__lemma1_1,axiom,
    ( ~ c_in(X,c_Zorn_OTFin(Y,Z),tc_set(tc_set(Z)))
    | ~ c_in(U,c_Zorn_OTFin(Y,Z),tc_set(tc_set(Z)))
    | c_lessequals(U,X,tc_set(tc_set(Z)))
    | c_lessequals(c_Zorn_OTFin__linear__lemma1__1(Y,X,Z),X,tc_set(tc_set(Z)))
    | c_lessequals(c_Zorn_Osucc(Y,X,Z),U,tc_set(tc_set(Z))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Zorn_OTFin__linear__lemma1_1) ).

cnf(cls_Zorn_OTFin__linear__lemma1_2,axiom,
    ( ~ c_in(X,c_Zorn_OTFin(Y,Z),tc_set(tc_set(Z)))
    | ~ c_in(U,c_Zorn_OTFin(Y,Z),tc_set(tc_set(Z)))
    | c_Zorn_OTFin__linear__lemma1__1(Y,X,Z) != X
    | c_lessequals(U,X,tc_set(tc_set(Z)))
    | c_lessequals(c_Zorn_Osucc(Y,X,Z),U,tc_set(tc_set(Z))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Zorn_OTFin__linear__lemma1_2) ).

cnf(cls_Zorn_OTFin__linear__lemma1_3,axiom,
    ( ~ c_in(X,c_Zorn_OTFin(Y,Z),tc_set(tc_set(Z)))
    | ~ c_in(U,c_Zorn_OTFin(Y,Z),tc_set(tc_set(Z)))
    | ~ c_lessequals(c_Zorn_Osucc(Y,c_Zorn_OTFin__linear__lemma1__1(Y,X,Z),Z),X,tc_set(tc_set(Z)))
    | c_lessequals(U,X,tc_set(tc_set(Z)))
    | c_lessequals(c_Zorn_Osucc(Y,X,Z),U,tc_set(tc_set(Z))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Zorn_OTFin__linear__lemma1_3) ).

cnf(cls_conjecture_0,negated_conjecture,
    c_lessequals(v_Y,c_Zorn_OTFin(v_S,t_a),tc_set(tc_set(tc_set(t_a)))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).

cnf(cls_conjecture_1,negated_conjecture,
    c_in(v_n,c_Zorn_OTFin(v_S,t_a),tc_set(tc_set(t_a))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_1) ).

cnf(cls_conjecture_3,negated_conjecture,
    c_in(v_x,v_Y,tc_set(tc_set(t_a))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_3) ).

cnf(cls_conjecture_4,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_lessequals(v_x,v_n,tc_set(tc_set(t_a))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_4) ).

cnf(cls_conjecture_5,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_lessequals(c_Zorn_Osucc(v_S,v_n,t_a),v_x,tc_set(tc_set(t_a))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_5) ).

cnf(cls_conjecture_6,negated_conjecture,
    ( c_lessequals(c_Zorn_Osucc(v_S,X,t_a),Y,tc_set(tc_set(t_a)))
    | X = Y
    | ~ c_lessequals(X,Y,tc_set(tc_set(t_a)))
    | ~ c_in(X,c_Zorn_OTFin(v_S,t_a),tc_set(tc_set(t_a)))
    | ~ c_in(Y,v_Y,tc_set(tc_set(t_a))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_6) ).

cnf(15,plain,
    c_in(c_Main_OsubsetI__1(v_x,v_n,tc_set(t_a)),v_x,tc_set(t_a)),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[cls_conjecture_4,cls_Set_OsubsetI_0]) ).

cnf(17,plain,
    ~ c_in(c_Main_OsubsetI__1(v_x,v_n,tc_set(t_a)),v_n,tc_set(t_a)),
    inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[cls_Set_OsubsetI_1,cls_conjecture_4]) ).

cnf(19,plain,
    c_in(v_x,c_Zorn_OTFin(v_S,t_a),tc_set(tc_set(t_a))),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[cls_Set_OsubsetD_0,cls_conjecture_3,cls_conjecture_0]) ).

cnf(28,plain,
    c_Zorn_OTFin__linear__lemma1__1(v_S,v_n,t_a) != v_n,
    inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[cls_Zorn_OTFin__linear__lemma1_2,19,cls_conjecture_1,cls_conjecture_4,cls_conjecture_5]) ).

cnf(29,plain,
    c_lessequals(c_Zorn_OTFin__linear__lemma1__1(v_S,v_n,t_a),v_n,tc_set(tc_set(t_a))),
    inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[cls_Zorn_OTFin__linear__lemma1_1,19,cls_conjecture_1,cls_conjecture_4,cls_conjecture_5]) ).

cnf(30,plain,
    c_in(c_Zorn_OTFin__linear__lemma1__1(v_S,v_n,t_a),c_Zorn_OTFin(v_S,t_a),tc_set(tc_set(t_a))),
    inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[cls_Zorn_OTFin__linear__lemma1_0,19,cls_conjecture_1,cls_conjecture_4,cls_conjecture_5]) ).

cnf(32,plain,
    ~ c_lessequals(c_Zorn_Osucc(v_S,c_Zorn_OTFin__linear__lemma1__1(v_S,v_n,t_a),t_a),v_n,tc_set(tc_set(t_a))),
    inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[cls_Zorn_OTFin__linear__lemma1_3,19,cls_conjecture_1,cls_conjecture_4,cls_conjecture_5]) ).

cnf(34,plain,
    ( c_lessequals(v_n,v_x,tc_set(tc_set(t_a)))
    | c_lessequals(c_Zorn_OTFin__linear__lemma1__1(v_S,v_x,t_a),v_x,tc_set(tc_set(t_a)))
    | c_lessequals(c_Zorn_Osucc(v_S,v_x,t_a),v_n,tc_set(tc_set(t_a))) ),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[cls_Zorn_OTFin__linear__lemma1_1,19,cls_conjecture_1]) ).

cnf(36,plain,
    ( c_in(c_Zorn_OTFin__linear__lemma1__1(v_S,v_x,t_a),c_Zorn_OTFin(v_S,t_a),tc_set(tc_set(t_a)))
    | c_lessequals(v_n,v_x,tc_set(tc_set(t_a)))
    | c_lessequals(c_Zorn_Osucc(v_S,v_x,t_a),v_n,tc_set(tc_set(t_a))) ),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[cls_Zorn_OTFin__linear__lemma1_0,19,cls_conjecture_1]) ).

cnf(41,plain,
    c_in(c_Main_OsubsetI__1(v_x,v_n,tc_set(t_a)),c_Zorn_Osucc(X,v_x,t_a),tc_set(t_a)),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[cls_Set_OsubsetD_0,15,cls_Zorn_OAbrial__axiom1_0]) ).

cnf(67,plain,
    ~ c_in(v_n,v_Y,tc_set(tc_set(t_a))),
    inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[cls_conjecture_6,32,28,29,30]) ).

cnf(71,plain,
    ~ c_lessequals(c_Zorn_Osucc(X,v_x,t_a),v_n,tc_set(tc_set(t_a))),
    inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[cls_Set_OsubsetD_0,41,17]) ).

cnf(72,plain,
    ( c_lessequals(v_n,v_x,tc_set(tc_set(t_a)))
    | c_lessequals(c_Zorn_OTFin__linear__lemma1__1(v_S,v_x,t_a),v_x,tc_set(tc_set(t_a))) ),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[34,71]) ).

cnf(73,plain,
    ( c_in(c_Zorn_OTFin__linear__lemma1__1(v_S,v_x,t_a),c_Zorn_OTFin(v_S,t_a),tc_set(tc_set(t_a)))
    | c_lessequals(v_n,v_x,tc_set(tc_set(t_a))) ),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[36,71]) ).

cnf(159,plain,
    ( c_in(c_Zorn_OTFin__linear__lemma1__1(v_S,v_x,t_a),c_Zorn_OTFin(v_S,t_a),tc_set(tc_set(t_a)))
    | v_n = v_x ),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[cls_conjecture_6,73,cls_conjecture_1,cls_conjecture_3]),cls_conjecture_5]) ).

cnf(163,plain,
    ( v_n = v_x
    | c_lessequals(v_n,v_x,tc_set(tc_set(t_a)))
    | c_lessequals(c_Zorn_Osucc(v_S,c_Zorn_OTFin__linear__lemma1__1(v_S,v_x,t_a),t_a),v_x,tc_set(tc_set(t_a)))
    | c_Zorn_OTFin__linear__lemma1__1(v_S,v_x,t_a) = v_x ),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[cls_conjecture_6,159,72,cls_conjecture_3]) ).

cnf(750,plain,
    ( v_n = v_x
    | c_lessequals(v_n,v_x,tc_set(tc_set(t_a)))
    | c_Zorn_OTFin__linear__lemma1__1(v_S,v_x,t_a) = v_x ),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[cls_Zorn_OTFin__linear__lemma1_3,163,19,cls_conjecture_1]),71]) ).

cnf(752,plain,
    ( v_n = v_x
    | c_Zorn_OTFin__linear__lemma1__1(v_S,v_x,t_a) = v_x ),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[cls_conjecture_6,750,cls_conjecture_1,cls_conjecture_3]),cls_conjecture_5]) ).

cnf(755,plain,
    ( v_n = v_x
    | c_lessequals(v_n,v_x,tc_set(tc_set(t_a))) ),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[cls_Zorn_OTFin__linear__lemma1_2,752,19,cls_conjecture_1]),71]) ).

cnf(769,plain,
    v_n = v_x,
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[cls_conjecture_6,755,cls_conjecture_1,cls_conjecture_3]),cls_conjecture_5]) ).

cnf(770,plain,
    $false,
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[cls_conjecture_3,67,769,theory(equality)]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12  % Problem  : SET857-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.11/0.13  % Command  : run-snark %s %d
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Sun Jul 10 19:13:15 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.20/0.45  /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.20/0.46  * 
% 0.20/0.46  * 
% 0.20/0.47  #<PACKAGE "SNARK-USER">
% 0.20/0.47  * 
% 0.20/0.47  SNARK-TPTP-OPTIONS
% 0.20/0.47  * 
% 0.20/0.47  ((AGENDA-LENGTH-LIMIT NIL) (AGENDA-LENGTH-BEFORE-SIMPLIFICATION-LIMIT NIL)
% 0.20/0.47   (USE-HYPERRESOLUTION T) (USE-UR-RESOLUTION T) (USE-PARAMODULATION T)
% 0.20/0.47   (USE-FACTORING :POS)
% 0.20/0.47   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-HYPERRESOLUTION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.20/0.47   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-PARAMODULATION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.20/0.47   (ORDERING-FUNCTIONS>CONSTANTS T) (ASSERT-CONTEXT :CURRENT)
% 0.20/0.47   (RUN-TIME-LIMIT 300) (LISTEN-FOR-COMMANDS NIL)
% 0.20/0.47   (USE-CLOSURE-WHEN-SATISFIABLE T) (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-GIVEN NIL)
% 0.20/0.47   (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-DERIVED NIL) (PRINT-UNORIENTABLE-ROWS NIL)
% 0.20/0.47   (PRINT-ROW-WFFS-PRETTILY NIL) (PRINT-FINAL-ROWS :TPTP)
% 0.20/0.47   (PRINT-OPTIONS-WHEN-STARTING NIL) (USE-VARIABLE-NAME-SORTS NIL)
% 0.20/0.47   (USE-PURITY-TEST T) (USE-RELEVANCE-TEST T) (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS1)
% 0.20/0.47   (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS2))
% 0.20/0.47  * 
% 0.20/0.47  "."
% 0.20/0.47  * 
% 0.20/0.47  ; Begin refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-07-10T19:13:15
% 0.20/0.47  ; Running SNARK from /davis/home/graph/tptp/Systems/SNARK---20120808r022/Source/snark-system.lisp in SBCL 1.0.12 on n010.cluster.edu at 2022-07-10T19:13:15
% 1.07/1.27  
% 1.07/1.27  
% 1.07/1.27  #||
% 1.07/1.27  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 1.07/1.27  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 1.07/1.27  ||#
% 1.07/1.27  
% 1.07/1.27  ; Summary of computation:
% 1.07/1.27  ;      1903 formulas have been input or derived (from 221 formulas).
% 1.07/1.27  ;       770 (40%) were retained.  Of these,
% 1.07/1.27  ;          594 (77%) were simplified or subsumed later,
% 1.07/1.27  ;          176 (23%) are still being kept.
% 1.07/1.27  ; 
% 1.07/1.27  ; Run time in seconds excluding printing time:
% 1.07/1.27  ;     0.005   1%   Read assertion file          (1 call)
% 1.07/1.27  ;     0.000   0%   Assert                       (14 calls)
% 1.07/1.27  ;     0.115  14%   Process new row              (1,251 calls)
% 1.07/1.27  ;     0.067   8%   Resolution                   (440 calls)
% 1.07/1.27  ;     0.006   1%   Paramodulation               (220 calls)
% 1.07/1.27  ;     0.001   0%   Factoring                    (82 calls)
% 1.07/1.27  ;     0.011   1%   Condensing                   (816 calls)
% 1.07/1.27  ;     0.408  51%   Forward subsumption          (816 calls)
% 1.07/1.27  ;     0.050   6%   Backward subsumption         (601 calls)
% 1.07/1.27  ;     0.010   1%   Clause clause subsumption    (4,552 calls)
% 1.07/1.27  ;     0.038   5%   Forward simplification       (1,225 calls)
% 1.07/1.27  ;     0.044   6%   Backward simplification      (770 calls)
% 1.07/1.27  ;     0.015   2%   Ordering                     (6,345 calls)
% 1.07/1.27  ;     0.000   0%   Sortal reasoning             (32 calls)
% 1.07/1.27  ;     0.000   0%   Purity testing               (1 call)
% 1.07/1.27  ;     0.028   4%   Other
% 1.07/1.27  ;     0.798        Total
% 1.07/1.27  ;     0.801        Real time
% 1.07/1.27  ; 
% 1.07/1.27  ; Term-hash-array has 913 terms in all.
% 1.07/1.27  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 110 entries (573 at peak, 601 added, 491 deleted).
% 1.07/1.27  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 1,976 nodes (9,482 at peak, 9,948 added, 7,972 deleted).
% 1.07/1.27  ;  Retrieved 6,285 possibly forward subsuming rows in 816 calls.
% 1.07/1.27  ;  Retrieved 932 possibly backward subsumed rows in 601 calls.
% 1.07/1.27  ; Path-index has 267 entries (912 at peak, 924 added, 657 deleted).
% 1.07/1.27  ; Path-index has 965 nodes (1,179 at peak, 1,179 added, 214 deleted).
% 1.07/1.27  ; Trie-index has 267 entries (912 at peak, 924 added, 657 deleted).
% 1.07/1.27  ; Trie-index has 1,989 nodes (5,530 at peak, 5,581 added, 3,592 deleted).
% 1.07/1.27  ; Retrieved 333 generalization terms in 3,924 calls.
% 1.07/1.27  ; Retrieved 170 instance terms in 168 calls.
% 1.07/1.27  ; Retrieved 13,756 unifiable terms in 4,334 calls.
% 1.07/1.27  ; 
% 1.07/1.27  ; The agenda of backward simplifiable rows to process has 519 entries:
% 1.07/1.27  ;   519 with value 0
% 1.07/1.27  ; The agenda of rows to process has 8 entries:
% 1.07/1.27  ;     2 with value 36              1 with value 45               4 with value 48
% 1.07/1.27  ;     1 with value 39
% 1.07/1.27  ; The agenda of rows to give has 106 entries:
% 1.07/1.27  ;     1 with value (4 12)          3 with value (4 61)           1 with value (4 88)
% 1.07/1.27  ;     2 with value (4 40)          1 with value (4 62)           3 with value (4 90)
% 1.07/1.27  ;     4 with value (4 41)          2 with value (4 63)           4 with value (4 93)
% 1.07/1.27  ;     3 with value (4 42)          1 with value (4 64)           1 with value (4 94)
% 1.07/1.27  ;     5 with value (4 43)          2 with value (4 66)           3 with value (4 95)
% 1.07/1.27  ;     1 with value (4 44)          2 with value (4 67)           3 with value (4 98)
% 1.07/1.27  ;     4 with value (4 45)          1 with value (4 68)           1 with value (4 99)
% 1.07/1.27  ;     2 with value (4 47)          3 with value (4 72)           3 with value (4 100)
% 1.07/1.27  ;     2 with value (4 48)          3 with value (4 73)           2 with value (4 103)
% 1.07/1.27  ;     3 with value (4 50)          1 with value (4 75)           3 with value (4 105)
% 1.07/1.27  ;     1 with value (4 51)          2 with value (4 76)           1 with value (4 107)
% 1.07/1.27  ;     1 with value (4 52)          3 with value (4 77)           1 with value (4 108)
% 1.07/1.27  ;     2 with value (4 53)          1 with value (4 78)           1 with value (4 109)
% 1.07/1.27  ;     2 with value (4 54)          1 with value (4 79)           2 with value (4 116)
% 1.07/1.27  ;     1 with value (4 55)          1 with value (4 81)           2 with value (4 119)
% 1.07/1.27  ;     1 with value (4 56)          1 with value (4 82)           1 with value (4 121)
% 1.07/1.27  ;     1 with value (4 58)          1 with value (4 83)           2 with value (4 126)
% 1.07/1.27  ;     1 with value (4 59)          2 with value (4 84)           1 with value (4 129)
% 1.07/1.27  ;     2 with value (4 60)          1 with value (4 86)
% 1.07/1.27  Evaluation took:
% 1.07/1.27    0.801 seconds of real time
% 1.07/1.27    0.756647 seconds of user run time
% 1.07/1.27    0.044839 seconds of system run time
% 1.07/1.27    [Run times include 0.044 seconds GC run time.]
% 1.07/1.27    0 calls to %EVAL
% 1.07/1.27    0 page faults and
% 1.07/1.27    91,919,992 bytes consed.
% 1.07/1.27  :PROOF-FOUND
% 1.07/1.27  ; End refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-07-10T19:13:16
% 1.07/1.27  :PROOF-FOUND
% 1.07/1.27  * 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------