TSTP Solution File: SET851-2 by Prover9---1109a

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---1109a
% Problem  : SET851-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : tptp2X_and_run_prover9 %d %s

% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 04:32:50 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.44s 0.99s
% Output   : Refutation 0.44s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem  : SET851-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.07/0.13  % Command  : tptp2X_and_run_prover9 %d %s
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Sun Jul 10 17:40:33 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.44/0.99  ============================== Prover9 ===============================
% 0.44/0.99  Prover9 (32) version 2009-11A, November 2009.
% 0.44/0.99  Process 10771 was started by sandbox2 on n017.cluster.edu,
% 0.44/0.99  Sun Jul 10 17:40:33 2022
% 0.44/0.99  The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/prover9 -t 300 -f /tmp/Prover9_10507_n017.cluster.edu".
% 0.44/0.99  ============================== end of head ===========================
% 0.44/0.99  
% 0.44/0.99  ============================== INPUT =================================
% 0.44/0.99  
% 0.44/0.99  % Reading from file /tmp/Prover9_10507_n017.cluster.edu
% 0.44/0.99  
% 0.44/0.99  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.44/0.99  set(auto2).
% 0.44/0.99      % set(auto2) -> set(auto).
% 0.44/0.99      % set(auto) -> set(auto_inference).
% 0.44/0.99      % set(auto) -> set(auto_setup).
% 0.44/0.99      % set(auto_setup) -> set(predicate_elim).
% 0.44/0.99      % set(auto_setup) -> assign(eq_defs, unfold).
% 0.44/0.99      % set(auto) -> set(auto_limits).
% 0.44/0.99      % set(auto_limits) -> assign(max_weight, "100.000").
% 0.44/0.99      % set(auto_limits) -> assign(sos_limit, 20000).
% 0.44/0.99      % set(auto) -> set(auto_denials).
% 0.44/0.99      % set(auto) -> set(auto_process).
% 0.44/0.99      % set(auto2) -> assign(new_constants, 1).
% 0.44/0.99      % set(auto2) -> assign(fold_denial_max, 3).
% 0.44/0.99      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_weight, "200.000").
% 0.44/0.99      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_hours, 1).
% 0.44/0.99      % assign(max_hours, 1) -> assign(max_seconds, 3600).
% 0.44/0.99      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_seconds, 0).
% 0.44/0.99      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_minutes, 5).
% 0.44/0.99      % assign(max_minutes, 5) -> assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.44/0.99      % set(auto2) -> set(sort_initial_sos).
% 0.44/0.99      % set(auto2) -> assign(sos_limit, -1).
% 0.44/0.99      % set(auto2) -> assign(lrs_ticks, 3000).
% 0.44/0.99      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_megs, 400).
% 0.44/0.99      % set(auto2) -> assign(stats, some).
% 0.44/0.99      % set(auto2) -> clear(echo_input).
% 0.44/0.99      % set(auto2) -> set(quiet).
% 0.44/0.99      % set(auto2) -> clear(print_initial_clauses).
% 0.44/0.99      % set(auto2) -> clear(print_given).
% 0.44/0.99  assign(lrs_ticks,-1).
% 0.44/0.99  assign(sos_limit,10000).
% 0.44/0.99  assign(order,kbo).
% 0.44/0.99  set(lex_order_vars).
% 0.44/0.99  clear(print_given).
% 0.44/0.99  
% 0.44/0.99  % formulas(sos).  % not echoed (7 formulas)
% 0.44/0.99  
% 0.44/0.99  ============================== end of input ==========================
% 0.44/0.99  
% 0.44/0.99  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.44/0.99  
% 0.44/0.99  ============================== PROCESS NON-CLAUSAL FORMULAS ==========
% 0.44/0.99  
% 0.44/0.99  % Formulas that are not ordinary clauses:
% 0.44/0.99  
% 0.44/0.99  ============================== end of process non-clausal formulas ===
% 0.44/0.99  
% 0.44/0.99  ============================== PROCESS INITIAL CLAUSES ===============
% 0.44/0.99  
% 0.44/0.99  ============================== PREDICATE ELIMINATION =================
% 0.44/0.99  
% 0.44/0.99  ============================== end predicate elimination =============
% 0.44/0.99  
% 0.44/0.99  Auto_denials:  (non-Horn, no changes).
% 0.44/0.99  
% 0.44/0.99  Term ordering decisions:
% 0.44/0.99  
% 0.44/0.99  % Assigning unary symbol tc_set kb_weight 0 and highest precedence (10).
% 0.44/0.99  Function symbol KB weights:  t_a=1. v_m=1. v_S=1. v_x=1. c_Zorn_OTFin=1. c_Zorn_Osucc=1. tc_set=0.
% 0.44/0.99  
% 0.44/0.99  ============================== end of process initial clauses ========
% 0.44/0.99  
% 0.44/0.99  ============================== CLAUSES FOR SEARCH ====================
% 0.44/0.99  
% 0.44/0.99  ============================== end of clauses for search =============
% 0.44/0.99  
% 0.44/0.99  ============================== SEARCH ================================
% 0.44/0.99  
% 0.44/0.99  % Starting search at 0.01 seconds.
% 0.44/0.99  
% 0.44/0.99  ============================== PROOF =================================
% 0.44/0.99  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.44/0.99  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.44/0.99  
% 0.44/0.99  % Proof 1 at 0.01 (+ 0.00) seconds.
% 0.44/0.99  % Length of proof is 12.
% 0.44/0.99  % Level of proof is 4.
% 0.44/0.99  % Maximum clause weight is 26.000.
% 0.44/0.99  % Given clauses 7.
% 0.44/0.99  
% 0.44/0.99  1 c_lessequals(A,A,tc_set(B)) # label(cls_Set_Osubset__refl_0) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 0.44/0.99  2 c_in(v_x,c_Zorn_OTFin(v_S,t_a),tc_set(tc_set(t_a))) # label(cls_conjecture_1) # label(negated_conjecture).  [assumption].
% 0.44/0.99  3 c_lessequals(c_Zorn_Osucc(v_S,v_m,t_a),v_x,tc_set(tc_set(t_a))) | c_lessequals(v_x,v_m,tc_set(tc_set(t_a))) # label(cls_conjecture_4) # label(negated_conjecture).  [assumption].
% 0.44/0.99  4 -c_lessequals(c_Zorn_Osucc(v_S,v_x,t_a),v_m,tc_set(tc_set(t_a))) # label(cls_conjecture_2) # label(negated_conjecture).  [assumption].
% 0.44/0.99  5 -c_lessequals(c_Zorn_Osucc(v_S,v_m,t_a),c_Zorn_Osucc(v_S,v_x,t_a),tc_set(tc_set(t_a))) # label(cls_conjecture_3) # label(negated_conjecture).  [assumption].
% 0.44/0.99  6 -c_lessequals(A,B,tc_set(tc_set(C))) | c_lessequals(A,c_Zorn_Osucc(D,B,C),tc_set(tc_set(C))) # label(cls_Zorn_Osucc__trans_0) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 0.44/0.99  7 c_lessequals(c_Zorn_Osucc(v_S,A,t_a),v_m,tc_set(tc_set(t_a))) | A = v_m | -c_lessequals(A,v_m,tc_set(tc_set(t_a))) | -c_in(A,c_Zorn_OTFin(v_S,t_a),tc_set(tc_set(t_a))) # label(cls_conjecture_5) # label(negated_conjecture).  [assumption].
% 0.44/0.99  8 c_lessequals(c_Zorn_Osucc(v_S,A,t_a),v_m,tc_set(tc_set(t_a))) | v_m = A | -c_lessequals(A,v_m,tc_set(tc_set(t_a))) | -c_in(A,c_Zorn_OTFin(v_S,t_a),tc_set(tc_set(t_a))).  [copy(7),flip(b)].
% 0.44/0.99  11 -c_lessequals(c_Zorn_Osucc(v_S,v_m,t_a),v_x,tc_set(tc_set(t_a))).  [ur(6,b,5,a)].
% 0.44/0.99  12 c_lessequals(v_x,v_m,tc_set(tc_set(t_a))).  [back_unit_del(3),unit_del(a,11)].
% 0.44/0.99  13 v_x = v_m.  [resolve(8,d,2,a),flip(b),unit_del(a,4),unit_del(c,12)].
% 0.44/0.99  15 $F.  [back_rewrite(5),rewrite([13(6)]),unit_del(a,1)].
% 0.44/0.99  
% 0.44/0.99  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.44/0.99  ============================== end of proof ==========================
% 0.44/0.99  
% 0.44/0.99  ============================== STATISTICS ============================
% 0.44/0.99  
% 0.44/0.99  Given=7. Generated=15. Kept=13. proofs=1.
% 0.44/0.99  Usable=5. Sos=1. Demods=1. Limbo=2, Disabled=12. Hints=0.
% 0.44/0.99  Megabytes=0.04.
% 0.44/0.99  User_CPU=0.01, System_CPU=0.00, Wall_clock=0.
% 0.44/0.99  
% 0.44/0.99  ============================== end of statistics =====================
% 0.44/0.99  
% 0.44/0.99  ============================== end of search =========================
% 0.44/0.99  
% 0.44/0.99  THEOREM PROVED
% 0.44/0.99  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.44/0.99  
% 0.44/0.99  Exiting with 1 proof.
% 0.44/0.99  
% 0.44/0.99  Process 10771 exit (max_proofs) Sun Jul 10 17:40:33 2022
% 0.44/0.99  Prover9 interrupted
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------