TSTP Solution File: SET848-1 by Vampire---4.8

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Vampire---4.8
% Problem  : SET848-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s

% Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 21 03:13:37 EDT 2024

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.55s 0.76s
% Output   : Refutation 0.55s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    4
%            Number of leaves      :    7
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   11 (   7 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   16 (   2 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   14 (   9   ~;   5   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    9 (   9 usr;   2 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   15 (  15   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f1413,plain,
    $false,
    inference(unit_resulting_resolution,[],[f310,f1401,f1359]) ).

fof(f1359,axiom,
    ! [X2,X40,X54] :
      ( c_in(c_Union(X54,tc_set(X2)),c_Zorn_OTFin(X40,X2),tc_set(tc_set(X2)))
      | ~ c_lessequals(X54,c_Zorn_OTFin(X40,X2),tc_set(tc_set(tc_set(X2)))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Zorn_OTFin__UnionI_0) ).

fof(f1401,plain,
    ~ c_in(c_Union(c_Zorn_OTFin(v_S,t_a),tc_set(t_a)),c_Zorn_OTFin(v_S,t_a),tc_set(tc_set(t_a))),
    inference(unit_resulting_resolution,[],[f1399,f1360]) ).

fof(f1360,axiom,
    ! [X40,X2,X34] :
      ( c_in(X34,c_Zorn_Ochain(X40,X2),tc_set(tc_set(X2)))
      | ~ c_in(X34,c_Zorn_OTFin(X40,X2),tc_set(tc_set(X2))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Zorn_OTFin__chain__lemma4_0) ).

fof(f1399,plain,
    ~ c_in(c_Union(c_Zorn_OTFin(v_S,t_a),tc_set(t_a)),c_Zorn_Ochain(v_S,t_a),tc_set(tc_set(t_a))),
    inference(unit_resulting_resolution,[],[f1364,f1375,f159]) ).

fof(f159,axiom,
    ! [X2,X34,X15,X13] :
      ( c_in(X34,c_minus(X13,X15,tc_set(X2)),X2)
      | c_in(X34,X15,X2)
      | ~ c_in(X34,X13,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Set_ODiffI_0) ).

fof(f1375,plain,
    ~ c_in(c_Union(c_Zorn_OTFin(v_S,t_a),tc_set(t_a)),c_minus(c_Zorn_Ochain(v_S,t_a),c_Zorn_Omaxchain(v_S,t_a),tc_set(tc_set(tc_set(t_a)))),tc_set(tc_set(t_a))),
    inference(unit_resulting_resolution,[],[f1365,f1363]) ).

fof(f1363,axiom,
    ! [X40,X2,X34] :
      ( ~ c_in(X34,c_minus(c_Zorn_Ochain(X40,X2),c_Zorn_Omaxchain(X40,X2),tc_set(tc_set(tc_set(X2)))),tc_set(tc_set(X2)))
      | c_Zorn_Osucc(X40,X34,X2) != X34 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Zorn_Osucc__not__equals_0) ).

fof(f1365,axiom,
    c_Union(c_Zorn_OTFin(v_S,t_a),tc_set(t_a)) = c_Zorn_Osucc(v_S,c_Union(c_Zorn_OTFin(v_S,t_a),tc_set(t_a)),t_a),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_1) ).

fof(f1364,axiom,
    ~ c_in(c_Union(c_Zorn_OTFin(v_S,t_a),tc_set(t_a)),c_Zorn_Omaxchain(v_S,t_a),tc_set(tc_set(t_a))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).

fof(f310,axiom,
    ! [X2,X13] : c_lessequals(X13,X13,tc_set(X2)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Set_Osubset__refl_0) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.13  % Problem    : SET848-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.08/0.14  % Command    : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% 0.14/0.35  % Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % DateTime   : Mon May 20 11:29:53 EDT 2024
% 0.14/0.35  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.14/0.35  This is a CNF_UNS_RFO_SEQ_NHN problem
% 0.14/0.36  Running vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.55/0.75  % (25382)lrs+21_1:5_sil=2000:sos=on:urr=on:newcnf=on:slsq=on:i=83:slsql=off:bd=off:nm=2:ss=axioms:st=1.5:sp=const_min:gsp=on:rawr=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/83Mi)
% 0.55/0.75  % (25376)dis-1011_2:1_sil=2000:lsd=20:nwc=5.0:flr=on:mep=off:st=3.0:i=34:sd=1:ep=RS:ss=axioms_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/34Mi)
% 0.55/0.75  % (25377)lrs+1011_461:32768_sil=16000:irw=on:sp=frequency:lsd=20:fd=preordered:nwc=10.0:s2agt=32:alpa=false:cond=fast:s2a=on:i=51:s2at=3.0:awrs=decay:awrsf=691:bd=off:nm=20:fsr=off:amm=sco:uhcvi=on:rawr=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/51Mi)
% 0.55/0.75  % (25379)ott+1011_1:1_sil=2000:urr=on:i=33:sd=1:kws=inv_frequency:ss=axioms:sup=off_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/33Mi)
% 0.55/0.75  % (25378)lrs+1011_1:1_sil=8000:sp=occurrence:nwc=10.0:i=78:ss=axioms:sgt=8_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/78Mi)
% 0.55/0.76  % (25380)lrs+2_1:1_sil=16000:fde=none:sos=all:nwc=5.0:i=34:ep=RS:s2pl=on:lma=on:afp=100000_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/34Mi)
% 0.55/0.76  % (25381)lrs+1002_1:16_to=lpo:sil=32000:sp=unary_frequency:sos=on:i=45:bd=off:ss=axioms_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/45Mi)
% 0.55/0.76  % (25381)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy% (25381)------------------------------
% 0.55/0.76  % (25381)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.55/0.76  % (25379)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy% (25379)------------------------------
% 0.55/0.76  % (25379)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.55/0.76  % (25379)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.55/0.76  
% 0.55/0.76  % (25379)Memory used [KB]: 1735
% 0.55/0.76  % (25379)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 0.55/0.76  % (25379)Instructions burned: 5 (million)
% 0.55/0.76  % (25381)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.55/0.76  
% 0.55/0.76  % (25381)Memory used [KB]: 1736
% 0.55/0.76  % (25381)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 0.55/0.76  % (25381)Instructions burned: 5 (million)
% 0.55/0.76  % (25379)------------------------------
% 0.55/0.76  % (25379)------------------------------
% 0.55/0.76  % (25381)------------------------------
% 0.55/0.76  % (25381)------------------------------
% 0.55/0.76  % (25376)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy% (25376)------------------------------
% 0.55/0.76  % (25376)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.55/0.76  % (25376)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.55/0.76  
% 0.55/0.76  % (25376)Memory used [KB]: 1783
% 0.55/0.76  % (25376)Time elapsed: 0.006 s
% 0.55/0.76  % (25376)Instructions burned: 8 (million)
% 0.55/0.76  % (25382)First to succeed.
% 0.55/0.76  % (25376)------------------------------
% 0.55/0.76  % (25376)------------------------------
% 0.55/0.76  % (25382)Solution written to "/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/vampire-proof-25375"
% 0.55/0.76  % (25382)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.55/0.76  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 0.55/0.76  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.55/0.76  % (25382)------------------------------
% 0.55/0.76  % (25382)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.55/0.76  % (25382)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.55/0.76  
% 0.55/0.76  % (25382)Memory used [KB]: 1956
% 0.55/0.76  % (25382)Time elapsed: 0.007 s
% 0.55/0.76  % (25382)Instructions burned: 19 (million)
% 0.55/0.76  % (25375)Success in time 0.392 s
% 0.55/0.76  % Vampire---4.8 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------