TSTP Solution File: SET829-2 by CSE---1.6
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CSE---1.6
% Problem : SET829-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d
% Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 14:31:13 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.16s 0.61s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.16s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.10 % Problem : SET829-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.11 % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d
% 0.11/0.32 % Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.32 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.32 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.32 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.32 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.32 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.32 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.11/0.32 % DateTime : Sat Aug 26 09:30:35 EDT 2023
% 0.11/0.32 % CPUTime :
% 0.16/0.56 start to proof:theBenchmark
% 0.16/0.60 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.16/0.60 % File :CSE---1.6
% 0.16/0.60 % Problem :theBenchmark
% 0.16/0.60 % Transform :cnf
% 0.16/0.60 % Format :tptp:raw
% 0.16/0.60 % Command :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.16/0.60
% 0.16/0.60 % Result :Theorem 0.000000s
% 0.16/0.60 % Output :CNFRefutation 0.000000s
% 0.16/0.60 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.16/0.61 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.16/0.61 % File : SET829-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.16/0.61 % Domain : Set Theory
% 0.16/0.61 % Problem : Problem about set theory
% 0.16/0.61 % Version : [Pau06] axioms : Reduced > Especial.
% 0.16/0.61 % English :
% 0.16/0.61
% 0.16/0.61 % Refs : [Pau06] Paulson (2006), Email to G. Sutcliffe
% 0.16/0.61 % Source : [Pau06]
% 0.16/0.61 % Names :
% 0.16/0.61
% 0.16/0.61 % Status : Unsatisfiable
% 0.16/0.61 % Rating : 0.00 v5.3.0, 0.05 v5.2.0, 0.00 v3.2.0
% 0.16/0.61 % Syntax : Number of clauses : 4 ( 3 unt; 0 nHn; 4 RR)
% 0.16/0.61 % Number of literals : 6 ( 0 equ; 3 neg)
% 0.16/0.61 % Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% 0.16/0.61 % Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% 0.16/0.61 % Number of predicates : 2 ( 2 usr; 0 prp; 3-3 aty)
% 0.16/0.61 % Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 4 con; 0-1 aty)
% 0.16/0.61 % Number of variables : 4 ( 0 sgn)
% 0.16/0.61 % SPC : CNF_UNS_RFO_NEQ_HRN
% 0.16/0.61
% 0.16/0.61 % Comments : The problems in the [Pau06] collection each have very many axioms,
% 0.16/0.61 % of which only a small selection are required for the refutation.
% 0.16/0.61 % The mission is to find those few axioms, after which a refutation
% 0.16/0.61 % can be quite easily found. This version has only the necessary
% 0.16/0.61 % axioms.
% 0.16/0.61 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.16/0.61 cnf(cls_Set_OsubsetD_0,axiom,
% 0.16/0.61 ( ~ c_in(V_c,V_A,T_a)
% 0.16/0.61 | ~ c_lessequals(V_A,V_B,tc_set(T_a))
% 0.16/0.61 | c_in(V_c,V_B,T_a) ) ).
% 0.16/0.61
% 0.16/0.61 cnf(cls_conjecture_1,negated_conjecture,
% 0.16/0.61 c_lessequals(v_X,v_Z,tc_set(t_a)) ).
% 0.16/0.61
% 0.16/0.61 cnf(cls_conjecture_2,negated_conjecture,
% 0.16/0.61 c_in(v_x,v_X,t_a) ).
% 0.16/0.61
% 0.16/0.61 cnf(cls_conjecture_3,negated_conjecture,
% 0.16/0.61 ~ c_in(v_x,v_Z,t_a) ).
% 0.16/0.61
% 0.16/0.61 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.16/0.61 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.16/0.61 % Proof found
% 0.16/0.61 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.16/0.61 % SZS output start Proof
% 0.16/0.61 %ClaNum:4(EqnAxiom:0)
% 0.16/0.61 %VarNum:9(SingletonVarNum:4)
% 0.16/0.61 %MaxLitNum:3
% 0.16/0.61 %MaxfuncDepth:1
% 0.16/0.61 %SharedTerms:8
% 0.16/0.61 %goalClause: 1 2 3
% 0.16/0.61 %singleGoalClaCount:3
% 0.16/0.61 [1]P1(a1,a2,a3)
% 0.16/0.61 [3]~P1(a1,a5,a3)
% 0.16/0.61 [2]P2(a2,a5,f4(a3))
% 0.16/0.61 [4]P1(x41,x42,x43)+~P1(x41,x44,x43)+~P2(x44,x42,f4(x43))
% 0.16/0.61 %EqnAxiom
% 0.16/0.61
% 0.16/0.61 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.16/0.61 cnf(5,plain,
% 0.16/0.61 ($false),
% 0.16/0.61 inference(scs_inference,[],[3,1,2,4]),
% 0.16/0.61 ['proof']).
% 0.16/0.61 % SZS output end Proof
% 0.16/0.61 % Total time :0.000000s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------