TSTP Solution File: SET814+4 by E-SAT---3.1.00
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.1.00
% Problem : SET814+4 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 21 02:59:57 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 0.19s 0.49s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.19s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 9
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 29 ( 4 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 92 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 15 ( 3 avg)
% Number of connectives : 104 ( 41 ~; 42 |; 13 &)
% ( 3 <=>; 5 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 12 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 5 ( 4 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 7 ( 7 usr; 3 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 59 ( 0 sgn 28 !; 1 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(thI3,axiom,
! [X1,X2,X9] :
( ( subset(X1,X2)
& subset(X2,X9) )
=> subset(X1,X9) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',thI3) ).
fof(ordinal_number,axiom,
! [X1] :
( member(X1,on)
<=> ( set(X1)
& strict_well_order(member_predicate,X1)
& ! [X3] :
( member(X3,X1)
=> subset(X3,X1) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SET006+4.ax',ordinal_number) ).
fof(thV14,conjecture,
! [X1] :
( member(X1,on)
=> subset(sum(X1),X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',thV14) ).
fof(sum,axiom,
! [X3,X1] :
( member(X3,sum(X1))
<=> ? [X5] :
( member(X5,X1)
& member(X3,X5) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SET006+0.ax',sum) ).
fof(subset,axiom,
! [X1,X2] :
( subset(X1,X2)
<=> ! [X3] :
( member(X3,X1)
=> member(X3,X2) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SET006+0.ax',subset) ).
fof(c_0_5,plain,
! [X31,X32,X33] :
( ~ subset(X31,X32)
| ~ subset(X32,X33)
| subset(X31,X33) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[thI3])])]) ).
fof(c_0_6,plain,
! [X17,X18,X19] :
( ( set(X17)
| ~ member(X17,on) )
& ( strict_well_order(member_predicate,X17)
| ~ member(X17,on) )
& ( ~ member(X18,X17)
| subset(X18,X17)
| ~ member(X17,on) )
& ( member(esk3_1(X19),X19)
| ~ set(X19)
| ~ strict_well_order(member_predicate,X19)
| member(X19,on) )
& ( ~ subset(esk3_1(X19),X19)
| ~ set(X19)
| ~ strict_well_order(member_predicate,X19)
| member(X19,on) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ordinal_number])])])])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X1] :
( member(X1,on)
=> subset(sum(X1),X1) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[thV14]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
( subset(X1,X3)
| ~ subset(X1,X2)
| ~ subset(X2,X3) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
( subset(X1,X2)
| ~ member(X1,X2)
| ~ member(X2,on) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
fof(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
( member(esk1_0,on)
& ~ subset(sum(esk1_0),esk1_0) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_7])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
( subset(X1,X2)
| ~ member(X2,on)
| ~ member(X3,X2)
| ~ subset(X1,X3) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
member(esk1_0,on),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).
fof(c_0_13,plain,
! [X34,X35,X37,X38,X39] :
( ( member(esk7_2(X34,X35),X35)
| ~ member(X34,sum(X35)) )
& ( member(X34,esk7_2(X34,X35))
| ~ member(X34,sum(X35)) )
& ( ~ member(X39,X38)
| ~ member(X37,X39)
| member(X37,sum(X38)) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[sum])])])])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_14,plain,
! [X11,X12,X13,X14,X15] :
( ( ~ subset(X11,X12)
| ~ member(X13,X11)
| member(X13,X12) )
& ( member(esk2_2(X14,X15),X14)
| subset(X14,X15) )
& ( ~ member(esk2_2(X14,X15),X15)
| subset(X14,X15) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[subset])])])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
( subset(X1,esk1_0)
| ~ member(X2,esk1_0)
| ~ subset(X1,X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
( member(esk7_2(X1,X2),X2)
| ~ member(X1,sum(X2)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
( subset(X1,X2)
| ~ member(esk2_2(X1,X2),X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
( member(esk2_2(X1,X2),X1)
| subset(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,plain,
( member(X3,X2)
| ~ subset(X1,X2)
| ~ member(X3,X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,plain,
( member(X1,esk7_2(X1,X2))
| ~ member(X1,sum(X2)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
( subset(X1,esk1_0)
| ~ member(X2,sum(esk1_0))
| ~ subset(X1,esk7_2(X2,esk1_0)) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,plain,
subset(X1,X1),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,plain,
( member(X1,X2)
| ~ member(X1,sum(X3))
| ~ subset(esk7_2(X1,X3),X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
( subset(esk7_2(X1,esk1_0),esk1_0)
| ~ member(X1,sum(esk1_0)) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
( member(X1,esk1_0)
| ~ member(X1,sum(esk1_0)) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_24]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
( member(esk2_2(sum(esk1_0),X1),esk1_0)
| subset(sum(esk1_0),X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_18]) ).
cnf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
~ subset(sum(esk1_0),esk1_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_26]),c_0_27]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12 % Problem : SET814+4 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.11/0.13 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Mon May 20 12:24:38 EDT 2024
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.46 Running first-order model finding
% 0.19/0.46 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.49 # Version: 3.1.0
% 0.19/0.49 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.19/0.49 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.19/0.49 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.19/0.49 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.49 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.49 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.49 # sh5l with pid 20819 completed with status 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Result found by sh5l
% 0.19/0.49 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.19/0.49 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.19/0.49 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.19/0.49 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.49 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.49 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.49 # SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.19/0.49 # Search class: FGHSF-FFMF32-SFFFFFNN
% 0.19/0.49 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.19/0.49 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 163s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.49 # G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 20820 completed with status 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.19/0.49 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.19/0.49 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.19/0.49 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.19/0.49 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.49 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.49 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.49 # SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.19/0.49 # Search class: FGHSF-FFMF32-SFFFFFNN
% 0.19/0.49 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.19/0.49 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 163s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.49 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.19/0.49 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.19/0.49
% 0.19/0.49 # Proof found!
% 0.19/0.49 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.19/0.49 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.19/0.49 # Parsed axioms : 21
% 0.19/0.49 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 10
% 0.19/0.49 # Initial clauses : 56
% 0.19/0.49 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Initial clauses in saturation : 56
% 0.19/0.49 # Processed clauses : 168
% 0.19/0.49 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # ...subsumed : 7
% 0.19/0.49 # ...remaining for further processing : 161
% 0.19/0.49 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Backward-subsumed : 2
% 0.19/0.49 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Generated clauses : 257
% 0.19/0.49 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 244
% 0.19/0.49 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Paramodulations : 257
% 0.19/0.49 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # NegExts : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Total rewrite steps : 4
% 0.19/0.49 # ...of those cached : 2
% 0.19/0.49 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.19/0.49 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.19/0.49 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.19/0.49 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.19/0.49 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.19/0.49 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.19/0.49 # Current number of processed clauses : 103
% 0.19/0.49 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 3
% 0.19/0.49 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Negative unit clauses : 2
% 0.19/0.49 # Non-unit-clauses : 98
% 0.19/0.49 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 183
% 0.19/0.49 # ...number of literals in the above : 731
% 0.19/0.49 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Current number of archived clauses : 58
% 0.19/0.49 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 1664
% 0.19/0.49 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1188
% 0.19/0.49 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 9
% 0.19/0.49 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 30
% 0.19/0.49 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # BW rewrite match attempts : 6
% 0.19/0.49 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Termbank termtop insertions : 8115
% 0.19/0.49 # Search garbage collected termcells : 1016
% 0.19/0.49
% 0.19/0.49 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.49 # User time : 0.015 s
% 0.19/0.49 # System time : 0.002 s
% 0.19/0.49 # Total time : 0.018 s
% 0.19/0.49 # Maximum resident set size: 1864 pages
% 0.19/0.49
% 0.19/0.49 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.49 # User time : 0.016 s
% 0.19/0.49 # System time : 0.005 s
% 0.19/0.49 # Total time : 0.021 s
% 0.19/0.49 # Maximum resident set size: 1732 pages
% 0.19/0.49 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------