TSTP Solution File: SET813+4 by Beagle---0.9.51

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Beagle---0.9.51
% Problem  : SET813+4 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s

% Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Aug 22 10:57:03 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 5.25s 2.29s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 5.25s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    4
%            Number of leaves      :   39
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   46 (   4 unt;  35 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   19 (   1 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   14 (   6   ~;   4   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   3 <=>;   1  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    6 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   60 (  31   >;  29   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :   10 (   8 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   27 (  27 usr;   4 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   16 (;  16   !;   0   ?;   0   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%$ least > apply > subset > strict_well_order > strict_order > member > equal_set > set > initial_segment > unordered_pair > union > intersection > difference > #nlpp > sum > suc > singleton > product > power_set > on > member_predicate > empty_set > #skF_11 > #skF_6 > #skF_4 > #skF_3 > #skF_13 > #skF_12 > #skF_14 > #skF_10 > #skF_7 > #skF_2 > #skF_8 > #skF_1 > #skF_9 > #skF_5

%Foreground sorts:

%Background operators:

%Foreground operators:
tff('#skF_11',type,
    '#skF_11': ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(equal_set,type,
    equal_set: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(strict_well_order,type,
    strict_well_order: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(power_set,type,
    power_set: $i > $i ).

tff('#skF_6',type,
    '#skF_6': ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(product,type,
    product: $i > $i ).

tff('#skF_4',type,
    '#skF_4': $i > $i ).

tff(apply,type,
    apply: ( $i * $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(singleton,type,
    singleton: $i > $i ).

tff(unordered_pair,type,
    unordered_pair: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(sum,type,
    sum: $i > $i ).

tff(intersection,type,
    intersection: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(union,type,
    union: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(on,type,
    on: $i ).

tff('#skF_3',type,
    '#skF_3': ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff('#skF_13',type,
    '#skF_13': ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff('#skF_12',type,
    '#skF_12': ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(initial_segment,type,
    initial_segment: ( $i * $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff('#skF_14',type,
    '#skF_14': $i ).

tff(strict_order,type,
    strict_order: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(subset,type,
    subset: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(member,type,
    member: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff('#skF_10',type,
    '#skF_10': ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(set,type,
    set: $i > $o ).

tff('#skF_7',type,
    '#skF_7': ( $i * $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(empty_set,type,
    empty_set: $i ).

tff(suc,type,
    suc: $i > $i ).

tff(least,type,
    least: ( $i * $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff('#skF_2',type,
    '#skF_2': ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(difference,type,
    difference: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff('#skF_8',type,
    '#skF_8': ( $i * $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(member_predicate,type,
    member_predicate: $i ).

tff('#skF_1',type,
    '#skF_1': ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff('#skF_9',type,
    '#skF_9': ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff('#skF_5',type,
    '#skF_5': ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(f_92,axiom,
    ! [X,A] :
      ( member(X,singleton(A))
    <=> ( X = A ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET006+0.ax',singleton) ).

tff(f_78,axiom,
    ! [X,A,B] :
      ( member(X,union(A,B))
    <=> ( member(X,A)
        | member(X,B) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET006+0.ax',union) ).

tff(f_219,axiom,
    ! [A,X] :
      ( member(X,suc(A))
    <=> member(X,union(A,singleton(A))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET006+4.ax',successor) ).

tff(f_226,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [A] :
        ( member(A,on)
       => member(A,suc(A)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',thV12) ).

tff(c_40,plain,
    ! [X_20] : member(X_20,singleton(X_20)),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_92]) ).

tff(c_26,plain,
    ! [X_13,B_15,A_14] :
      ( ~ member(X_13,B_15)
      | member(X_13,union(A_14,B_15)) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_78]) ).

tff(c_1429,plain,
    ! [X_260,A_261] :
      ( member(X_260,suc(A_261))
      | ~ member(X_260,union(A_261,singleton(A_261))) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_219]) ).

tff(c_1550,plain,
    ! [X_267,A_268] :
      ( member(X_267,suc(A_268))
      | ~ member(X_267,singleton(A_268)) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_26,c_1429]) ).

tff(c_158,plain,
    ~ member('#skF_14',suc('#skF_14')),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_226]) ).

tff(c_1567,plain,
    ~ member('#skF_14',singleton('#skF_14')),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_1550,c_158]) ).

tff(c_1576,plain,
    $false,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_40,c_1567]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.14  % Problem  : SET813+4 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.15  % Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% 0.14/0.36  % Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.36  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.36  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.14/0.36  % DateTime : Thu Aug  3 16:34:17 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 5.25/2.29  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 5.25/2.29  
% 5.25/2.29  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 5.25/2.32  
% 5.25/2.32  Inference rules
% 5.25/2.32  ----------------------
% 5.25/2.32  #Ref     : 0
% 5.25/2.32  #Sup     : 289
% 5.25/2.32  #Fact    : 0
% 5.25/2.32  #Define  : 0
% 5.25/2.32  #Split   : 6
% 5.25/2.32  #Chain   : 0
% 5.25/2.32  #Close   : 0
% 5.25/2.32  
% 5.25/2.32  Ordering : KBO
% 5.25/2.32  
% 5.25/2.32  Simplification rules
% 5.25/2.32  ----------------------
% 5.25/2.32  #Subsume      : 6
% 5.25/2.32  #Demod        : 55
% 5.25/2.32  #Tautology    : 59
% 5.25/2.32  #SimpNegUnit  : 0
% 5.25/2.32  #BackRed      : 0
% 5.25/2.32  
% 5.25/2.32  #Partial instantiations: 0
% 5.25/2.32  #Strategies tried      : 1
% 5.25/2.32  
% 5.25/2.32  Timing (in seconds)
% 5.25/2.32  ----------------------
% 5.25/2.33  Preprocessing        : 0.58
% 5.25/2.33  Parsing              : 0.30
% 5.25/2.33  CNF conversion       : 0.05
% 5.25/2.33  Main loop            : 0.65
% 5.25/2.33  Inferencing          : 0.23
% 5.25/2.33  Reduction            : 0.18
% 5.25/2.33  Demodulation         : 0.12
% 5.25/2.33  BG Simplification    : 0.03
% 5.25/2.33  Subsumption          : 0.15
% 5.25/2.33  Abstraction          : 0.02
% 5.25/2.33  MUC search           : 0.00
% 5.25/2.33  Cooper               : 0.00
% 5.25/2.33  Total                : 1.27
% 5.25/2.33  Index Insertion      : 0.00
% 5.25/2.33  Index Deletion       : 0.00
% 5.25/2.33  Index Matching       : 0.00
% 5.25/2.33  BG Taut test         : 0.00
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------