TSTP Solution File: SET753+4 by ET---2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : ET---2.0
% Problem  : SET753+4 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v2.2.1.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_ET %s %d

% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 00:53:45 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.57s 51.73s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.57s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    8
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   29 (   3 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   83 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    7 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   86 (  32   ~;  33   |;  15   &)
%                                         (   3 <=>;   3  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   13 (   5 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   4 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    9 (   9 usr;   5 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   99 (  12 sgn  37   !;   1   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(image2,axiom,
    ! [X6,X1,X5] :
      ( member(X5,image2(X6,X1))
    <=> ? [X3] :
          ( member(X3,X1)
          & apply(X6,X3,X5) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET006+1.ax',image2) ).

fof(intersection,axiom,
    ! [X3,X1,X2] :
      ( member(X3,intersection(X1,X2))
    <=> ( member(X3,X1)
        & member(X3,X2) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET006+0.ax',intersection) ).

fof(subset,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( subset(X1,X2)
    <=> ! [X3] :
          ( member(X3,X1)
         => member(X3,X2) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET006+0.ax',subset) ).

fof(thIIa03,conjecture,
    ! [X6,X1,X2,X3,X5] :
      ( ( maps(X6,X1,X2)
        & subset(X3,X1)
        & subset(X5,X1) )
     => subset(image2(X6,intersection(X3,X5)),intersection(image2(X6,X3),image2(X6,X5))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p',thIIa03) ).

fof(c_0_4,plain,
    ! [X7,X8,X9,X7,X8,X9,X11] :
      ( ( member(esk7_3(X7,X8,X9),X8)
        | ~ member(X9,image2(X7,X8)) )
      & ( apply(X7,esk7_3(X7,X8,X9),X9)
        | ~ member(X9,image2(X7,X8)) )
      & ( ~ member(X11,X8)
        | ~ apply(X7,X11,X9)
        | member(X9,image2(X7,X8)) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[image2])])])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_5,plain,
    ! [X4,X5,X6,X4,X5,X6] :
      ( ( member(X4,X5)
        | ~ member(X4,intersection(X5,X6)) )
      & ( member(X4,X6)
        | ~ member(X4,intersection(X5,X6)) )
      & ( ~ member(X4,X5)
        | ~ member(X4,X6)
        | member(X4,intersection(X5,X6)) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[intersection])])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_6,plain,
    ( member(X1,image2(X2,X3))
    | ~ apply(X2,X4,X1)
    | ~ member(X4,X3) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_7,plain,
    ( apply(X2,esk7_3(X2,X3,X1),X1)
    | ~ member(X1,image2(X2,X3)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_8,plain,
    ( member(X1,X3)
    | ~ member(X1,intersection(X2,X3)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,plain,
    ( member(esk7_3(X2,X3,X1),X3)
    | ~ member(X1,image2(X2,X3)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).

fof(c_0_10,plain,
    ! [X4,X5,X6,X4,X5] :
      ( ( ~ subset(X4,X5)
        | ~ member(X6,X4)
        | member(X6,X5) )
      & ( member(esk6_2(X4,X5),X4)
        | subset(X4,X5) )
      & ( ~ member(esk6_2(X4,X5),X5)
        | subset(X4,X5) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[subset])])])])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    ( member(X1,image2(X2,X3))
    | ~ member(esk7_3(X2,X4,X1),X3)
    | ~ member(X1,image2(X2,X4)) ),
    inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    ( member(esk7_3(X1,intersection(X2,X3),X4),X3)
    | ~ member(X4,image2(X1,intersection(X2,X3))) ),
    inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    ( member(X1,X2)
    | ~ member(X1,intersection(X2,X3)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    ( subset(X1,X2)
    | ~ member(esk6_2(X1,X2),X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    ( member(X1,intersection(X2,X3))
    | ~ member(X1,X3)
    | ~ member(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    ( member(X1,image2(X2,X3))
    | ~ member(X1,image2(X2,intersection(X4,X3))) ),
    inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    ( subset(X1,X2)
    | member(esk6_2(X1,X2),X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    ( member(esk7_3(X1,intersection(X2,X3),X4),X2)
    | ~ member(X4,image2(X1,intersection(X2,X3))) ),
    inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_9]) ).

fof(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X6,X1,X2,X3,X5] :
        ( ( maps(X6,X1,X2)
          & subset(X3,X1)
          & subset(X5,X1) )
       => subset(image2(X6,intersection(X3,X5)),intersection(image2(X6,X3),image2(X6,X5))) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[thIIa03]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    ( subset(X1,intersection(X2,X3))
    | ~ member(esk6_2(X1,intersection(X2,X3)),X3)
    | ~ member(esk6_2(X1,intersection(X2,X3)),X2) ),
    inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    ( member(esk6_2(image2(X1,intersection(X2,X3)),X4),image2(X1,X3))
    | subset(image2(X1,intersection(X2,X3)),X4) ),
    inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    ( member(X1,image2(X2,X3))
    | ~ member(X1,image2(X2,intersection(X3,X4))) ),
    inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_18]) ).

fof(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
    ( maps(esk1_0,esk2_0,esk3_0)
    & subset(esk4_0,esk2_0)
    & subset(esk5_0,esk2_0)
    & ~ subset(image2(esk1_0,intersection(esk4_0,esk5_0)),intersection(image2(esk1_0,esk4_0),image2(esk1_0,esk5_0))) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_19])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,plain,
    ( subset(image2(X1,intersection(X2,X3)),intersection(X4,image2(X1,X3)))
    | ~ member(esk6_2(image2(X1,intersection(X2,X3)),intersection(X4,image2(X1,X3))),X4) ),
    inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    ( member(esk6_2(image2(X1,intersection(X2,X3)),X4),image2(X1,X2))
    | subset(image2(X1,intersection(X2,X3)),X4) ),
    inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
    ~ subset(image2(esk1_0,intersection(esk4_0,esk5_0)),intersection(image2(esk1_0,esk4_0),image2(esk1_0,esk5_0))),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_23]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,plain,
    subset(image2(X1,intersection(X2,X3)),intersection(image2(X1,X2),image2(X1,X3))),
    inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_25]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_27])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13  % Problem  : SET753+4 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v2.2.1.
% 0.07/0.13  % Command  : run_ET %s %d
% 0.14/0.35  % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.14/0.35  % DateTime : Mon Jul 11 07:53:12 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.39/23.41  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.39/23.42  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.39/23.45  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.39/23.46  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.53/46.45  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.53/46.46  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.53/46.47  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.53/46.47  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.57/51.73  # Running protocol protocol_eprover_2d86bd69119e7e9cc4417c0ee581499eaf828bb2 for 23 seconds:
% 0.57/51.73  
% 0.57/51.73  # Failure: Resource limit exceeded (time)
% 0.57/51.73  # OLD status Res
% 0.57/51.73  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,,1.1,,02,500,1.0)
% 0.57/51.73  # Preprocessing time       : 0.016 s
% 0.57/51.73  # Running protocol protocol_eprover_230b6c199cce1dcf6700db59e75a93feb83d1bd9 for 23 seconds:
% 0.57/51.73  
% 0.57/51.73  # Failure: Resource limit exceeded (time)
% 0.57/51.73  # OLD status Res
% 0.57/51.73  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.1,,01,20000,1.0)
% 0.57/51.73  # Preprocessing time       : 0.016 s
% 0.57/51.73  # Running protocol protocol_eprover_48e494e00e0717ec2eabf59b73b2d711334607de for 23 seconds:
% 0.57/51.73  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.1,,03,20000,1.0)
% 0.57/51.73  # Preprocessing time       : 0.022 s
% 0.57/51.73  
% 0.57/51.73  # Proof found!
% 0.57/51.73  # SZS status Theorem
% 0.57/51.73  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.57/51.73  # Proof object total steps             : 29
% 0.57/51.73  # Proof object clause steps            : 20
% 0.57/51.73  # Proof object formula steps           : 9
% 0.57/51.73  # Proof object conjectures             : 5
% 0.57/51.73  # Proof object clause conjectures      : 2
% 0.57/51.73  # Proof object formula conjectures     : 3
% 0.57/51.73  # Proof object initial clauses used    : 9
% 0.57/51.73  # Proof object initial formulas used   : 4
% 0.57/51.73  # Proof object generating inferences   : 10
% 0.57/51.73  # Proof object simplifying inferences  : 2
% 0.57/51.73  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.57/51.73  # Parsed axioms                        : 29
% 0.57/51.73  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 24
% 0.57/51.73  # Initial clauses                      : 28
% 0.57/51.73  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.57/51.73  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 28
% 0.57/51.73  # Processed clauses                    : 19123
% 0.57/51.73  # ...of these trivial                  : 48
% 0.57/51.73  # ...subsumed                          : 6186
% 0.57/51.73  # ...remaining for further processing  : 12889
% 0.57/51.73  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.57/51.73  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 60141
% 0.57/51.73  # Backward-subsumed                    : 77
% 0.57/51.73  # Backward-rewritten                   : 53
% 0.57/51.73  # Generated clauses                    : 150719
% 0.57/51.73  # ...of the previous two non-trivial   : 149111
% 0.57/51.73  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 2415
% 0.57/51.73  # Paramodulations                      : 150719
% 0.57/51.73  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.57/51.73  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.57/51.73  # Current number of processed clauses  : 12759
% 0.57/51.73  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 8091
% 0.57/51.73  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.57/51.73  #    Negative unit clauses             : 0
% 0.57/51.73  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 4668
% 0.57/51.73  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 69875
% 0.57/51.73  # ...number of literals in the above   : 204300
% 0.57/51.73  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.57/51.73  # Current number of archived clauses   : 130
% 0.57/51.73  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 2017459
% 0.57/51.73  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1278227
% 0.57/51.73  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 8678
% 0.57/51.73  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2585184
% 0.57/51.73  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.57/51.73  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 2490341
% 0.57/51.73  # BW rewrite match successes           : 53
% 0.57/51.73  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.57/51.73  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.57/51.73  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 2226081
% 0.57/51.73  
% 0.57/51.73  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.57/51.73  # User time                : 4.414 s
% 0.57/51.73  # System time              : 0.115 s
% 0.57/51.73  # Total time               : 4.529 s
% 0.57/51.73  # Maximum resident set size: 154412 pages
% 0.57/69.48  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.57/69.51  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.57/69.51  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.57/69.51  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.57/69.51  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.57/69.51  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.57/69.52  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.57/69.52  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.57/69.52  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.57/69.52  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.57/69.53  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.57/69.53  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.57/69.53  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.57/69.53  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.57/69.53  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.57/69.53  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.57/69.54  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.57/69.54  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.57/69.54  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.57/69.54  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.57/69.54  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.57/69.54  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.57/69.54  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.57/69.54  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.57/69.55  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.57/69.55  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.57/69.55  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.57/69.55  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.57/69.55  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.57/69.55  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.57/69.56  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.57/69.56  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.57/69.56  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.57/69.56  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.57/69.57  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.57/69.57  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.57/69.57  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.57/69.57  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.57/72.55  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.57/72.57  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.57/72.57  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.57/72.57  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.57/72.57  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.57/72.57  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.57/72.57  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.57/72.57  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.57/72.57  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.57/72.58  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.57/72.58  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.57/72.58  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.57/72.58  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.57/72.58  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.57/72.58  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.57/72.59  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.57/72.59  eprover: No such file or directory
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------