TSTP Solution File: SET704+4 by Enigma---0.5.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : SET704+4 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 00:13:34 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 8.54s 2.52s
% Output : CNFRefutation 8.54s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 13 ( 5 unt; 3 nHn; 10 RR)
% Number of literals : 24 ( 0 equ; 10 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 4 ( 4 usr; 2 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 19 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_15,plain,
( member(X1,X2)
| ~ member(X2,X3)
| ~ member(X1,product(X3)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-jycm3wmg/input.p',i_0_15) ).
cnf(i_0_19,plain,
( subset(X1,X2)
| member(esk2_2(X1,X2),X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-jycm3wmg/input.p',i_0_19) ).
cnf(i_0_18,plain,
( subset(X1,X2)
| ~ member(esk2_2(X1,X2),X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-jycm3wmg/input.p',i_0_18) ).
cnf(i_0_24,negated_conjecture,
~ subset(product(esk4_0),esk5_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-jycm3wmg/input.p',i_0_24) ).
cnf(i_0_25,negated_conjecture,
member(esk5_0,esk4_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-jycm3wmg/input.p',i_0_25) ).
cnf(c_0_31,plain,
( member(X1,X2)
| ~ member(X2,X3)
| ~ member(X1,product(X3)) ),
i_0_15 ).
cnf(c_0_32,plain,
( subset(X1,X2)
| member(esk2_2(X1,X2),X1) ),
i_0_19 ).
cnf(c_0_33,plain,
( subset(X1,X2)
| ~ member(esk2_2(X1,X2),X2) ),
i_0_18 ).
cnf(c_0_34,plain,
( subset(product(X1),X2)
| member(esk2_2(product(X1),X2),X3)
| ~ member(X3,X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_32]) ).
cnf(c_0_35,negated_conjecture,
~ subset(product(esk4_0),esk5_0),
i_0_24 ).
cnf(c_0_36,plain,
( subset(product(X1),X2)
| ~ member(X2,X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_33,c_0_34]) ).
cnf(c_0_37,negated_conjecture,
member(esk5_0,esk4_0),
i_0_25 ).
cnf(c_0_38,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_35,c_0_36]),c_0_37])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13 % Problem : SET704+4 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.2.0.
% 0.07/0.14 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.13/0.35 % Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.35 % DateTime : Sun Jul 10 14:21:00 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.21/0.47 # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.21/0.48 # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.21/0.48 # Filter: axfilter_auto 0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 0.p
% 0.21/0.48 # Filter: axfilter_auto 1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 1.p
% 0.21/0.48 # Filter: axfilter_auto 2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 2.p
% 8.54/2.52 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by G_E___302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y:
% 8.54/2.52 # Version: 2.1pre011
% 8.54/2.52 # Preprocessing time : 0.012 s
% 8.54/2.52
% 8.54/2.52 # Proof found!
% 8.54/2.52 # SZS status Theorem
% 8.54/2.52 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 8.54/2.52 # Proof object total steps : 13
% 8.54/2.52 # Proof object clause steps : 8
% 8.54/2.52 # Proof object formula steps : 5
% 8.54/2.52 # Proof object conjectures : 5
% 8.54/2.52 # Proof object clause conjectures : 3
% 8.54/2.52 # Proof object formula conjectures : 2
% 8.54/2.52 # Proof object initial clauses used : 5
% 8.54/2.52 # Proof object initial formulas used : 5
% 8.54/2.52 # Proof object generating inferences : 3
% 8.54/2.52 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 2
% 8.54/2.52 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 8.54/2.52 # Parsed axioms : 31
% 8.54/2.52 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 8.54/2.52 # Initial clauses : 31
% 8.54/2.52 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 8.54/2.52 # Initial clauses in saturation : 31
% 8.54/2.52 # Processed clauses : 74
% 8.54/2.52 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 8.54/2.52 # ...subsumed : 7
% 8.54/2.52 # ...remaining for further processing : 67
% 8.54/2.52 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 5
% 8.54/2.52 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 8.54/2.52 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 8.54/2.52 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 8.54/2.52 # Generated clauses : 242
% 8.54/2.52 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 221
% 8.54/2.52 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 1
% 8.54/2.52 # Paramodulations : 235
% 8.54/2.52 # Factorizations : 2
% 8.54/2.52 # Equation resolutions : 5
% 8.54/2.52 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 8.54/2.52 # Propositional unsat check successes : 0
% 8.54/2.52 # Current number of processed clauses : 64
% 8.54/2.52 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 14
% 8.54/2.52 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 8.54/2.52 # Negative unit clauses : 11
% 8.54/2.52 # Non-unit-clauses : 39
% 8.54/2.52 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 176
% 8.54/2.52 # ...number of literals in the above : 349
% 8.54/2.52 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 8.54/2.52 # Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 8.54/2.52 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 212
% 8.54/2.52 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 176
% 8.54/2.52 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 5
% 8.54/2.52 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 69
% 8.54/2.52 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 8.54/2.52 # BW rewrite match attempts : 12
% 8.54/2.52 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 8.54/2.52 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 8.54/2.52 # Condensation successes : 0
% 8.54/2.52 # Termbank termtop insertions : 2716
% 8.54/2.52
% 8.54/2.52 # -------------------------------------------------
% 8.54/2.52 # User time : 0.011 s
% 8.54/2.52 # System time : 0.005 s
% 8.54/2.52 # Total time : 0.015 s
% 8.54/2.52 # ...preprocessing : 0.012 s
% 8.54/2.52 # ...main loop : 0.003 s
% 8.54/2.52 # Maximum resident set size: 7132 pages
% 8.54/2.52
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------