TSTP Solution File: SET694+4 by Princess---230619

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Princess---230619
% Problem  : SET694+4 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : princess -inputFormat=tptp +threads -portfolio=casc +printProof -timeoutSec=%d %s

% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 15:26:01 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 6.89s 1.70s
% Output   : Proof 8.80s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem  : SET694+4 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.2.0.
% 0.00/0.13  % Command  : princess -inputFormat=tptp +threads -portfolio=casc +printProof -timeoutSec=%d %s
% 0.17/0.34  % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.17/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.17/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.17/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.17/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.17/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.17/0.34  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.17/0.34  % DateTime : Sat Aug 26 11:38:47 EDT 2023
% 0.17/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.19/0.60  ________       _____
% 0.19/0.60  ___  __ \_________(_)________________________________
% 0.19/0.60  __  /_/ /_  ___/_  /__  __ \  ___/  _ \_  ___/_  ___/
% 0.19/0.60  _  ____/_  /   _  / _  / / / /__ /  __/(__  )_(__  )
% 0.19/0.60  /_/     /_/    /_/  /_/ /_/\___/ \___//____/ /____/
% 0.19/0.60  
% 0.19/0.60  A Theorem Prover for First-Order Logic modulo Linear Integer Arithmetic
% 0.19/0.60  (2023-06-19)
% 0.19/0.60  
% 0.19/0.60  (c) Philipp Rümmer, 2009-2023
% 0.19/0.60  Contributors: Peter Backeman, Peter Baumgartner, Angelo Brillout, Zafer Esen,
% 0.19/0.60                Amanda Stjerna.
% 0.19/0.60  Free software under BSD-3-Clause.
% 0.19/0.60  
% 0.19/0.60  For more information, visit http://www.philipp.ruemmer.org/princess.shtml
% 0.19/0.60  
% 0.19/0.60  Loading /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ...
% 0.19/0.62  Running up to 7 provers in parallel.
% 0.19/0.63  Prover 0: Options:  +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=0 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1042961893
% 0.19/0.63  Prover 1: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1571432423
% 0.19/0.63  Prover 2: Options:  +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMinimalAndEmpty -realRatSaturationRounds=1 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1065072994
% 0.19/0.63  Prover 3: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1922548996
% 0.19/0.63  Prover 4: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1868514696
% 0.19/0.63  Prover 5: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMaximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=complete -randomSeed=1259561288
% 0.19/0.63  Prover 6: Options:  -triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximalOutermost -realRatSaturationRounds=0 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1399714365
% 2.44/1.03  Prover 4: Preprocessing ...
% 2.44/1.03  Prover 1: Preprocessing ...
% 2.74/1.07  Prover 3: Preprocessing ...
% 2.74/1.07  Prover 5: Preprocessing ...
% 2.74/1.07  Prover 2: Preprocessing ...
% 2.74/1.07  Prover 0: Preprocessing ...
% 2.74/1.09  Prover 6: Preprocessing ...
% 4.61/1.43  Prover 6: Proving ...
% 4.61/1.44  Prover 5: Proving ...
% 4.61/1.46  Prover 1: Constructing countermodel ...
% 4.61/1.48  Prover 2: Proving ...
% 4.61/1.49  Prover 0: Proving ...
% 4.61/1.49  Prover 3: Constructing countermodel ...
% 4.61/1.50  Prover 4: Constructing countermodel ...
% 6.89/1.70  Prover 3: proved (1073ms)
% 6.89/1.70  
% 6.89/1.70  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 6.89/1.70  
% 6.89/1.70  Prover 6: stopped
% 6.89/1.70  Prover 5: stopped
% 6.89/1.70  Prover 2: stopped
% 6.89/1.70  Prover 7: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-236303470
% 6.89/1.70  Prover 8: Options:  +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-200781089
% 6.89/1.70  Prover 10: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=919308125
% 6.89/1.70  Prover 11: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1509710984
% 6.89/1.71  Prover 0: stopped
% 6.89/1.71  Prover 13: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=complete -randomSeed=1138197443
% 7.60/1.74  Prover 8: Preprocessing ...
% 7.60/1.74  Prover 11: Preprocessing ...
% 7.60/1.75  Prover 7: Preprocessing ...
% 7.60/1.75  Prover 13: Preprocessing ...
% 7.60/1.76  Prover 10: Preprocessing ...
% 7.60/1.78  Prover 1: Found proof (size 60)
% 7.60/1.78  Prover 1: proved (1157ms)
% 7.60/1.78  Prover 4: stopped
% 7.60/1.78  Prover 7: stopped
% 7.60/1.79  Prover 10: stopped
% 8.06/1.80  Prover 13: stopped
% 8.06/1.80  Prover 11: stopped
% 8.06/1.85  Prover 8: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 8.06/1.86  Prover 8: Constructing countermodel ...
% 8.46/1.87  Prover 8: stopped
% 8.46/1.87  
% 8.46/1.87  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 8.46/1.87  
% 8.46/1.88  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% 8.46/1.88  Assumptions after simplification:
% 8.46/1.88  ---------------------------------
% 8.46/1.88  
% 8.46/1.88    (power_set)
% 8.64/1.91     ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: int] : (v3 = 0 |  ~
% 8.64/1.91      (power_set(v1) = v2) |  ~ (member(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ $i(v1) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ?
% 8.64/1.91      [v4: int] : ( ~ (v4 = 0) & subset(v0, v1) = v4)) &  ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i]
% 8.64/1.91    :  ! [v2: $i] : ( ~ (power_set(v1) = v2) |  ~ (member(v0, v2) = 0) |  ~ $i(v1)
% 8.64/1.91      |  ~ $i(v0) | subset(v0, v1) = 0)
% 8.64/1.91  
% 8.64/1.91    (subset)
% 8.64/1.91     ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: int] : (v2 = 0 |  ~ (subset(v0, v1) = v2)
% 8.64/1.91      |  ~ $i(v1) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ? [v3: $i] :  ? [v4: int] : ( ~ (v4 = 0) &
% 8.64/1.92        member(v3, v1) = v4 & member(v3, v0) = 0 & $i(v3))) &  ! [v0: $i] :  !
% 8.64/1.92    [v1: $i] : ( ~ (subset(v0, v1) = 0) |  ~ $i(v1) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ! [v2: $i] : (
% 8.64/1.92        ~ (member(v2, v0) = 0) |  ~ $i(v2) | member(v2, v1) = 0))
% 8.64/1.92  
% 8.64/1.92    (thI22)
% 8.64/1.92     ? [v0: $i] :  ? [v1: $i] :  ? [v2: $i] :  ? [v3: $i] :  ? [v4: $i] :  ? [v5:
% 8.64/1.92      $i] :  ? [v6: $i] :  ? [v7: int] : ( ~ (v7 = 0) & union(v2, v3) = v4 &
% 8.64/1.92      union(v0, v1) = v5 & power_set(v5) = v6 & power_set(v1) = v3 & power_set(v0)
% 8.64/1.92      = v2 & subset(v4, v6) = v7 & $i(v6) & $i(v5) & $i(v4) & $i(v3) & $i(v2) &
% 8.64/1.92      $i(v1) & $i(v0))
% 8.64/1.92  
% 8.64/1.92    (union)
% 8.64/1.92     ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: $i] :  ! [v4: int] : (v4 = 0
% 8.64/1.92      |  ~ (union(v1, v2) = v3) |  ~ (member(v0, v3) = v4) |  ~ $i(v2) |  ~ $i(v1)
% 8.64/1.92      |  ~ $i(v0) |  ? [v5: int] :  ? [v6: int] : ( ~ (v6 = 0) &  ~ (v5 = 0) &
% 8.64/1.92        member(v0, v2) = v6 & member(v0, v1) = v5)) &  ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] : 
% 8.64/1.92    ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: $i] : ( ~ (union(v1, v2) = v3) |  ~ (member(v0, v3) = 0)
% 8.64/1.92      |  ~ $i(v2) |  ~ $i(v1) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ? [v4: any] :  ? [v5: any] :
% 8.64/1.92      (member(v0, v2) = v5 & member(v0, v1) = v4 & (v5 = 0 | v4 = 0)))
% 8.64/1.92  
% 8.64/1.92    (function-axioms)
% 8.64/1.93     ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~
% 8.64/1.93      (unordered_pair(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (unordered_pair(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0:
% 8.64/1.93      $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~
% 8.64/1.93      (difference(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (difference(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0: $i] :  !
% 8.64/1.93    [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (union(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~
% 8.64/1.93      (union(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3:
% 8.64/1.93      $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (intersection(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (intersection(v3, v2) =
% 8.64/1.93        v0)) &  ! [v0: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v1: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v2:
% 8.64/1.93      $i] :  ! [v3: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (equal_set(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~
% 8.64/1.93      (equal_set(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v1:
% 8.64/1.93      MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (subset(v3,
% 8.64/1.93          v2) = v1) |  ~ (subset(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0: MultipleValueBool] :  !
% 8.64/1.93    [v1: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~
% 8.64/1.93      (member(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (member(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1:
% 8.64/1.93      $i] :  ! [v2: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (product(v2) = v1) |  ~ (product(v2) =
% 8.64/1.93        v0)) &  ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (sum(v2) =
% 8.64/1.93        v1) |  ~ (sum(v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] : (v1 =
% 8.64/1.93      v0 |  ~ (singleton(v2) = v1) |  ~ (singleton(v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0: $i] :  !
% 8.64/1.93    [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (power_set(v2) = v1) |  ~
% 8.64/1.93      (power_set(v2) = v0))
% 8.64/1.93  
% 8.64/1.93  Further assumptions not needed in the proof:
% 8.64/1.93  --------------------------------------------
% 8.64/1.93  difference, empty_set, equal_set, intersection, product, singleton, sum,
% 8.64/1.93  unordered_pair
% 8.64/1.93  
% 8.64/1.93  Those formulas are unsatisfiable:
% 8.64/1.93  ---------------------------------
% 8.64/1.93  
% 8.64/1.93  Begin of proof
% 8.64/1.93  | 
% 8.80/1.94  | ALPHA: (subset) implies:
% 8.80/1.94  |   (1)   ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] : ( ~ (subset(v0, v1) = 0) |  ~ $i(v1) |  ~
% 8.80/1.94  |          $i(v0) |  ! [v2: $i] : ( ~ (member(v2, v0) = 0) |  ~ $i(v2) |
% 8.80/1.94  |            member(v2, v1) = 0))
% 8.80/1.94  |   (2)   ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: int] : (v2 = 0 |  ~ (subset(v0, v1)
% 8.80/1.94  |            = v2) |  ~ $i(v1) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ? [v3: $i] :  ? [v4: int] : ( ~
% 8.80/1.94  |            (v4 = 0) & member(v3, v1) = v4 & member(v3, v0) = 0 & $i(v3)))
% 8.80/1.94  | 
% 8.80/1.94  | ALPHA: (power_set) implies:
% 8.80/1.94  |   (3)   ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] : ( ~ (power_set(v1) = v2) |  ~
% 8.80/1.94  |          (member(v0, v2) = 0) |  ~ $i(v1) |  ~ $i(v0) | subset(v0, v1) = 0)
% 8.80/1.94  |   (4)   ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: int] : (v3 = 0 |  ~
% 8.80/1.94  |          (power_set(v1) = v2) |  ~ (member(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ $i(v1) |  ~
% 8.80/1.94  |          $i(v0) |  ? [v4: int] : ( ~ (v4 = 0) & subset(v0, v1) = v4))
% 8.80/1.94  | 
% 8.80/1.94  | ALPHA: (union) implies:
% 8.80/1.94  |   (5)   ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: $i] : ( ~ (union(v1,
% 8.80/1.94  |              v2) = v3) |  ~ (member(v0, v3) = 0) |  ~ $i(v2) |  ~ $i(v1) |  ~
% 8.80/1.94  |          $i(v0) |  ? [v4: any] :  ? [v5: any] : (member(v0, v2) = v5 &
% 8.80/1.94  |            member(v0, v1) = v4 & (v5 = 0 | v4 = 0)))
% 8.80/1.94  |   (6)   ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: $i] :  ! [v4: int] :
% 8.80/1.94  |        (v4 = 0 |  ~ (union(v1, v2) = v3) |  ~ (member(v0, v3) = v4) |  ~
% 8.80/1.94  |          $i(v2) |  ~ $i(v1) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ? [v5: int] :  ? [v6: int] : ( ~
% 8.80/1.94  |            (v6 = 0) &  ~ (v5 = 0) & member(v0, v2) = v6 & member(v0, v1) =
% 8.80/1.94  |            v5))
% 8.80/1.94  | 
% 8.80/1.94  | ALPHA: (function-axioms) implies:
% 8.80/1.94  |   (7)   ! [v0: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v1: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v2: $i] :
% 8.80/1.94  |         ! [v3: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (member(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (member(v3, v2)
% 8.80/1.94  |            = v0))
% 8.80/1.94  | 
% 8.80/1.95  | DELTA: instantiating (thI22) with fresh symbols all_15_0, all_15_1, all_15_2,
% 8.80/1.95  |        all_15_3, all_15_4, all_15_5, all_15_6, all_15_7 gives:
% 8.80/1.95  |   (8)   ~ (all_15_0 = 0) & union(all_15_5, all_15_4) = all_15_3 &
% 8.80/1.95  |        union(all_15_7, all_15_6) = all_15_2 & power_set(all_15_2) = all_15_1 &
% 8.80/1.95  |        power_set(all_15_6) = all_15_4 & power_set(all_15_7) = all_15_5 &
% 8.80/1.95  |        subset(all_15_3, all_15_1) = all_15_0 & $i(all_15_1) & $i(all_15_2) &
% 8.80/1.95  |        $i(all_15_3) & $i(all_15_4) & $i(all_15_5) & $i(all_15_6) &
% 8.80/1.95  |        $i(all_15_7)
% 8.80/1.95  | 
% 8.80/1.95  | ALPHA: (8) implies:
% 8.80/1.95  |   (9)   ~ (all_15_0 = 0)
% 8.80/1.95  |   (10)  $i(all_15_7)
% 8.80/1.95  |   (11)  $i(all_15_6)
% 8.80/1.95  |   (12)  $i(all_15_5)
% 8.80/1.95  |   (13)  $i(all_15_4)
% 8.80/1.95  |   (14)  $i(all_15_3)
% 8.80/1.95  |   (15)  $i(all_15_2)
% 8.80/1.95  |   (16)  $i(all_15_1)
% 8.80/1.95  |   (17)  subset(all_15_3, all_15_1) = all_15_0
% 8.80/1.95  |   (18)  power_set(all_15_7) = all_15_5
% 8.80/1.95  |   (19)  power_set(all_15_6) = all_15_4
% 8.80/1.95  |   (20)  power_set(all_15_2) = all_15_1
% 8.80/1.95  |   (21)  union(all_15_7, all_15_6) = all_15_2
% 8.80/1.95  |   (22)  union(all_15_5, all_15_4) = all_15_3
% 8.80/1.95  | 
% 8.80/1.95  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (2) with all_15_3, all_15_1, all_15_0, simplifying
% 8.80/1.95  |              with (14), (16), (17) gives:
% 8.80/1.95  |   (23)  all_15_0 = 0 |  ? [v0: $i] :  ? [v1: int] : ( ~ (v1 = 0) & member(v0,
% 8.80/1.95  |             all_15_1) = v1 & member(v0, all_15_3) = 0 & $i(v0))
% 8.80/1.95  | 
% 8.80/1.95  | BETA: splitting (23) gives:
% 8.80/1.95  | 
% 8.80/1.95  | Case 1:
% 8.80/1.95  | | 
% 8.80/1.95  | |   (24)  all_15_0 = 0
% 8.80/1.95  | | 
% 8.80/1.95  | | REDUCE: (9), (24) imply:
% 8.80/1.95  | |   (25)  $false
% 8.80/1.95  | | 
% 8.80/1.95  | | CLOSE: (25) is inconsistent.
% 8.80/1.95  | | 
% 8.80/1.95  | Case 2:
% 8.80/1.95  | | 
% 8.80/1.95  | |   (26)   ? [v0: $i] :  ? [v1: int] : ( ~ (v1 = 0) & member(v0, all_15_1) =
% 8.80/1.95  | |           v1 & member(v0, all_15_3) = 0 & $i(v0))
% 8.80/1.95  | | 
% 8.80/1.95  | | DELTA: instantiating (26) with fresh symbols all_24_0, all_24_1 gives:
% 8.80/1.95  | |   (27)   ~ (all_24_0 = 0) & member(all_24_1, all_15_1) = all_24_0 &
% 8.80/1.95  | |         member(all_24_1, all_15_3) = 0 & $i(all_24_1)
% 8.80/1.95  | | 
% 8.80/1.95  | | ALPHA: (27) implies:
% 8.80/1.96  | |   (28)   ~ (all_24_0 = 0)
% 8.80/1.96  | |   (29)  $i(all_24_1)
% 8.80/1.96  | |   (30)  member(all_24_1, all_15_3) = 0
% 8.80/1.96  | |   (31)  member(all_24_1, all_15_1) = all_24_0
% 8.80/1.96  | | 
% 8.80/1.96  | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (5) with all_24_1, all_15_5, all_15_4, all_15_3,
% 8.80/1.96  | |              simplifying with (12), (13), (22), (29), (30) gives:
% 8.80/1.96  | |   (32)   ? [v0: any] :  ? [v1: any] : (member(all_24_1, all_15_4) = v1 &
% 8.80/1.96  | |           member(all_24_1, all_15_5) = v0 & (v1 = 0 | v0 = 0))
% 8.80/1.96  | | 
% 8.80/1.96  | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (4) with all_24_1, all_15_2, all_15_1, all_24_0,
% 8.80/1.96  | |              simplifying with (15), (20), (29), (31) gives:
% 8.80/1.96  | |   (33)  all_24_0 = 0 |  ? [v0: int] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & subset(all_24_1,
% 8.80/1.96  | |             all_15_2) = v0)
% 8.80/1.96  | | 
% 8.80/1.96  | | DELTA: instantiating (32) with fresh symbols all_31_0, all_31_1 gives:
% 8.80/1.96  | |   (34)  member(all_24_1, all_15_4) = all_31_0 & member(all_24_1, all_15_5) =
% 8.80/1.96  | |         all_31_1 & (all_31_0 = 0 | all_31_1 = 0)
% 8.80/1.96  | | 
% 8.80/1.96  | | ALPHA: (34) implies:
% 8.80/1.96  | |   (35)  member(all_24_1, all_15_5) = all_31_1
% 8.80/1.96  | |   (36)  member(all_24_1, all_15_4) = all_31_0
% 8.80/1.96  | |   (37)  all_31_0 = 0 | all_31_1 = 0
% 8.80/1.96  | | 
% 8.80/1.96  | | BETA: splitting (33) gives:
% 8.80/1.96  | | 
% 8.80/1.96  | | Case 1:
% 8.80/1.96  | | | 
% 8.80/1.96  | | |   (38)  all_24_0 = 0
% 8.80/1.96  | | | 
% 8.80/1.96  | | | REDUCE: (28), (38) imply:
% 8.80/1.96  | | |   (39)  $false
% 8.80/1.96  | | | 
% 8.80/1.96  | | | CLOSE: (39) is inconsistent.
% 8.80/1.96  | | | 
% 8.80/1.96  | | Case 2:
% 8.80/1.96  | | | 
% 8.80/1.96  | | |   (40)   ? [v0: int] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & subset(all_24_1, all_15_2) = v0)
% 8.80/1.96  | | | 
% 8.80/1.96  | | | DELTA: instantiating (40) with fresh symbol all_37_0 gives:
% 8.80/1.96  | | |   (41)   ~ (all_37_0 = 0) & subset(all_24_1, all_15_2) = all_37_0
% 8.80/1.96  | | | 
% 8.80/1.96  | | | ALPHA: (41) implies:
% 8.80/1.96  | | |   (42)   ~ (all_37_0 = 0)
% 8.80/1.96  | | |   (43)  subset(all_24_1, all_15_2) = all_37_0
% 8.80/1.96  | | | 
% 8.80/1.96  | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (2) with all_24_1, all_15_2, all_37_0,
% 8.80/1.96  | | |              simplifying with (15), (29), (43) gives:
% 8.80/1.96  | | |   (44)  all_37_0 = 0 |  ? [v0: $i] :  ? [v1: int] : ( ~ (v1 = 0) &
% 8.80/1.96  | | |           member(v0, all_24_1) = 0 & member(v0, all_15_2) = v1 & $i(v0))
% 8.80/1.96  | | | 
% 8.80/1.96  | | | BETA: splitting (37) gives:
% 8.80/1.96  | | | 
% 8.80/1.96  | | | Case 1:
% 8.80/1.96  | | | | 
% 8.80/1.96  | | | |   (45)  all_31_0 = 0
% 8.80/1.96  | | | | 
% 8.80/1.96  | | | | REDUCE: (36), (45) imply:
% 8.80/1.96  | | | |   (46)  member(all_24_1, all_15_4) = 0
% 8.80/1.96  | | | | 
% 8.80/1.96  | | | | BETA: splitting (44) gives:
% 8.80/1.96  | | | | 
% 8.80/1.96  | | | | Case 1:
% 8.80/1.96  | | | | | 
% 8.80/1.96  | | | | |   (47)  all_37_0 = 0
% 8.80/1.96  | | | | | 
% 8.80/1.96  | | | | | REDUCE: (42), (47) imply:
% 8.80/1.96  | | | | |   (48)  $false
% 8.80/1.96  | | | | | 
% 8.80/1.96  | | | | | CLOSE: (48) is inconsistent.
% 8.80/1.96  | | | | | 
% 8.80/1.96  | | | | Case 2:
% 8.80/1.96  | | | | | 
% 8.80/1.96  | | | | |   (49)   ? [v0: $i] :  ? [v1: int] : ( ~ (v1 = 0) & member(v0,
% 8.80/1.96  | | | | |             all_24_1) = 0 & member(v0, all_15_2) = v1 & $i(v0))
% 8.80/1.96  | | | | | 
% 8.80/1.96  | | | | | DELTA: instantiating (49) with fresh symbols all_50_0, all_50_1 gives:
% 8.80/1.96  | | | | |   (50)   ~ (all_50_0 = 0) & member(all_50_1, all_24_1) = 0 &
% 8.80/1.96  | | | | |         member(all_50_1, all_15_2) = all_50_0 & $i(all_50_1)
% 8.80/1.96  | | | | | 
% 8.80/1.96  | | | | | ALPHA: (50) implies:
% 8.80/1.97  | | | | |   (51)   ~ (all_50_0 = 0)
% 8.80/1.97  | | | | |   (52)  $i(all_50_1)
% 8.80/1.97  | | | | |   (53)  member(all_50_1, all_15_2) = all_50_0
% 8.80/1.97  | | | | |   (54)  member(all_50_1, all_24_1) = 0
% 8.80/1.97  | | | | | 
% 8.80/1.97  | | | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (3) with all_24_1, all_15_6, all_15_4,
% 8.80/1.97  | | | | |              simplifying with (11), (19), (29), (46) gives:
% 8.80/1.97  | | | | |   (55)  subset(all_24_1, all_15_6) = 0
% 8.80/1.97  | | | | | 
% 8.80/1.97  | | | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (6) with all_50_1, all_15_7, all_15_6,
% 8.80/1.97  | | | | |              all_15_2, all_50_0, simplifying with (10), (11), (21),
% 8.80/1.97  | | | | |              (52), (53) gives:
% 8.80/1.97  | | | | |   (56)  all_50_0 = 0 |  ? [v0: int] :  ? [v1: int] : ( ~ (v1 = 0) &  ~
% 8.80/1.97  | | | | |           (v0 = 0) & member(all_50_1, all_15_6) = v1 &
% 8.80/1.97  | | | | |           member(all_50_1, all_15_7) = v0)
% 8.80/1.97  | | | | | 
% 8.80/1.97  | | | | | BETA: splitting (56) gives:
% 8.80/1.97  | | | | | 
% 8.80/1.97  | | | | | Case 1:
% 8.80/1.97  | | | | | | 
% 8.80/1.97  | | | | | |   (57)  all_50_0 = 0
% 8.80/1.97  | | | | | | 
% 8.80/1.97  | | | | | | REDUCE: (51), (57) imply:
% 8.80/1.97  | | | | | |   (58)  $false
% 8.80/1.97  | | | | | | 
% 8.80/1.97  | | | | | | CLOSE: (58) is inconsistent.
% 8.80/1.97  | | | | | | 
% 8.80/1.97  | | | | | Case 2:
% 8.80/1.97  | | | | | | 
% 8.80/1.97  | | | | | |   (59)   ? [v0: int] :  ? [v1: int] : ( ~ (v1 = 0) &  ~ (v0 = 0) &
% 8.80/1.97  | | | | | |           member(all_50_1, all_15_6) = v1 & member(all_50_1,
% 8.80/1.97  | | | | | |             all_15_7) = v0)
% 8.80/1.97  | | | | | | 
% 8.80/1.97  | | | | | | DELTA: instantiating (59) with fresh symbols all_62_0, all_62_1
% 8.80/1.97  | | | | | |        gives:
% 8.80/1.97  | | | | | |   (60)   ~ (all_62_0 = 0) &  ~ (all_62_1 = 0) & member(all_50_1,
% 8.80/1.97  | | | | | |           all_15_6) = all_62_0 & member(all_50_1, all_15_7) =
% 8.80/1.97  | | | | | |         all_62_1
% 8.80/1.97  | | | | | | 
% 8.80/1.97  | | | | | | ALPHA: (60) implies:
% 8.80/1.97  | | | | | |   (61)   ~ (all_62_0 = 0)
% 8.80/1.97  | | | | | |   (62)  member(all_50_1, all_15_6) = all_62_0
% 8.80/1.97  | | | | | | 
% 8.80/1.97  | | | | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (1) with all_24_1, all_15_6, simplifying
% 8.80/1.97  | | | | | |              with (11), (29), (55) gives:
% 8.80/1.97  | | | | | |   (63)   ! [v0: $i] : ( ~ (member(v0, all_24_1) = 0) |  ~ $i(v0) |
% 8.80/1.97  | | | | | |           member(v0, all_15_6) = 0)
% 8.80/1.97  | | | | | | 
% 8.80/1.97  | | | | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (63) with all_50_1, simplifying with
% 8.80/1.97  | | | | | |              (52), (54) gives:
% 8.80/1.97  | | | | | |   (64)  member(all_50_1, all_15_6) = 0
% 8.80/1.97  | | | | | | 
% 8.80/1.97  | | | | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (7) with all_62_0, 0, all_15_6, all_50_1,
% 8.80/1.97  | | | | | |              simplifying with (62), (64) gives:
% 8.80/1.97  | | | | | |   (65)  all_62_0 = 0
% 8.80/1.97  | | | | | | 
% 8.80/1.97  | | | | | | REDUCE: (61), (65) imply:
% 8.80/1.97  | | | | | |   (66)  $false
% 8.80/1.97  | | | | | | 
% 8.80/1.97  | | | | | | CLOSE: (66) is inconsistent.
% 8.80/1.97  | | | | | | 
% 8.80/1.97  | | | | | End of split
% 8.80/1.97  | | | | | 
% 8.80/1.97  | | | | End of split
% 8.80/1.97  | | | | 
% 8.80/1.97  | | | Case 2:
% 8.80/1.97  | | | | 
% 8.80/1.97  | | | |   (67)  all_31_1 = 0
% 8.80/1.97  | | | | 
% 8.80/1.97  | | | | REDUCE: (35), (67) imply:
% 8.80/1.97  | | | |   (68)  member(all_24_1, all_15_5) = 0
% 8.80/1.97  | | | | 
% 8.80/1.97  | | | | BETA: splitting (44) gives:
% 8.80/1.97  | | | | 
% 8.80/1.97  | | | | Case 1:
% 8.80/1.97  | | | | | 
% 8.80/1.97  | | | | |   (69)  all_37_0 = 0
% 8.80/1.97  | | | | | 
% 8.80/1.97  | | | | | REDUCE: (42), (69) imply:
% 8.80/1.97  | | | | |   (70)  $false
% 8.80/1.97  | | | | | 
% 8.80/1.97  | | | | | CLOSE: (70) is inconsistent.
% 8.80/1.97  | | | | | 
% 8.80/1.97  | | | | Case 2:
% 8.80/1.97  | | | | | 
% 8.80/1.97  | | | | |   (71)   ? [v0: $i] :  ? [v1: int] : ( ~ (v1 = 0) & member(v0,
% 8.80/1.97  | | | | |             all_24_1) = 0 & member(v0, all_15_2) = v1 & $i(v0))
% 8.80/1.97  | | | | | 
% 8.80/1.97  | | | | | DELTA: instantiating (71) with fresh symbols all_50_0, all_50_1 gives:
% 8.80/1.98  | | | | |   (72)   ~ (all_50_0 = 0) & member(all_50_1, all_24_1) = 0 &
% 8.80/1.98  | | | | |         member(all_50_1, all_15_2) = all_50_0 & $i(all_50_1)
% 8.80/1.98  | | | | | 
% 8.80/1.98  | | | | | ALPHA: (72) implies:
% 8.80/1.98  | | | | |   (73)   ~ (all_50_0 = 0)
% 8.80/1.98  | | | | |   (74)  $i(all_50_1)
% 8.80/1.98  | | | | |   (75)  member(all_50_1, all_15_2) = all_50_0
% 8.80/1.98  | | | | |   (76)  member(all_50_1, all_24_1) = 0
% 8.80/1.98  | | | | | 
% 8.80/1.98  | | | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (3) with all_24_1, all_15_7, all_15_5,
% 8.80/1.98  | | | | |              simplifying with (10), (18), (29), (68) gives:
% 8.80/1.98  | | | | |   (77)  subset(all_24_1, all_15_7) = 0
% 8.80/1.98  | | | | | 
% 8.80/1.98  | | | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (6) with all_50_1, all_15_7, all_15_6,
% 8.80/1.98  | | | | |              all_15_2, all_50_0, simplifying with (10), (11), (21),
% 8.80/1.98  | | | | |              (74), (75) gives:
% 8.80/1.98  | | | | |   (78)  all_50_0 = 0 |  ? [v0: int] :  ? [v1: int] : ( ~ (v1 = 0) &  ~
% 8.80/1.98  | | | | |           (v0 = 0) & member(all_50_1, all_15_6) = v1 &
% 8.80/1.98  | | | | |           member(all_50_1, all_15_7) = v0)
% 8.80/1.98  | | | | | 
% 8.80/1.98  | | | | | BETA: splitting (78) gives:
% 8.80/1.98  | | | | | 
% 8.80/1.98  | | | | | Case 1:
% 8.80/1.98  | | | | | | 
% 8.80/1.98  | | | | | |   (79)  all_50_0 = 0
% 8.80/1.98  | | | | | | 
% 8.80/1.98  | | | | | | REDUCE: (73), (79) imply:
% 8.80/1.98  | | | | | |   (80)  $false
% 8.80/1.98  | | | | | | 
% 8.80/1.98  | | | | | | CLOSE: (80) is inconsistent.
% 8.80/1.98  | | | | | | 
% 8.80/1.98  | | | | | Case 2:
% 8.80/1.98  | | | | | | 
% 8.80/1.98  | | | | | |   (81)   ? [v0: int] :  ? [v1: int] : ( ~ (v1 = 0) &  ~ (v0 = 0) &
% 8.80/1.98  | | | | | |           member(all_50_1, all_15_6) = v1 & member(all_50_1,
% 8.80/1.98  | | | | | |             all_15_7) = v0)
% 8.80/1.98  | | | | | | 
% 8.80/1.98  | | | | | | DELTA: instantiating (81) with fresh symbols all_72_0, all_72_1
% 8.80/1.98  | | | | | |        gives:
% 8.80/1.98  | | | | | |   (82)   ~ (all_72_0 = 0) &  ~ (all_72_1 = 0) & member(all_50_1,
% 8.80/1.98  | | | | | |           all_15_6) = all_72_0 & member(all_50_1, all_15_7) =
% 8.80/1.98  | | | | | |         all_72_1
% 8.80/1.98  | | | | | | 
% 8.80/1.98  | | | | | | ALPHA: (82) implies:
% 8.80/1.98  | | | | | |   (83)   ~ (all_72_1 = 0)
% 8.80/1.98  | | | | | |   (84)  member(all_50_1, all_15_7) = all_72_1
% 8.80/1.98  | | | | | | 
% 8.80/1.98  | | | | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (1) with all_24_1, all_15_7, simplifying
% 8.80/1.98  | | | | | |              with (10), (29), (77) gives:
% 8.80/1.98  | | | | | |   (85)   ! [v0: $i] : ( ~ (member(v0, all_24_1) = 0) |  ~ $i(v0) |
% 8.80/1.98  | | | | | |           member(v0, all_15_7) = 0)
% 8.80/1.98  | | | | | | 
% 8.80/1.98  | | | | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (85) with all_50_1, simplifying with
% 8.80/1.98  | | | | | |              (74), (76) gives:
% 8.80/1.98  | | | | | |   (86)  member(all_50_1, all_15_7) = 0
% 8.80/1.98  | | | | | | 
% 8.80/1.98  | | | | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (7) with all_72_1, 0, all_15_7, all_50_1,
% 8.80/1.98  | | | | | |              simplifying with (84), (86) gives:
% 8.80/1.98  | | | | | |   (87)  all_72_1 = 0
% 8.80/1.98  | | | | | | 
% 8.80/1.98  | | | | | | REDUCE: (83), (87) imply:
% 8.80/1.98  | | | | | |   (88)  $false
% 8.80/1.98  | | | | | | 
% 8.80/1.98  | | | | | | CLOSE: (88) is inconsistent.
% 8.80/1.98  | | | | | | 
% 8.80/1.98  | | | | | End of split
% 8.80/1.98  | | | | | 
% 8.80/1.98  | | | | End of split
% 8.80/1.98  | | | | 
% 8.80/1.98  | | | End of split
% 8.80/1.98  | | | 
% 8.80/1.98  | | End of split
% 8.80/1.98  | | 
% 8.80/1.99  | End of split
% 8.80/1.99  | 
% 8.80/1.99  End of proof
% 8.80/1.99  % SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark
% 8.80/1.99  
% 8.80/1.99  1380ms
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------