TSTP Solution File: SET657+3 by SOS---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : SET657+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 05:19:52 EDT 2022
% Result : Timeout 300.06s 300.23s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.13 % Problem : SET657+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.2.0.
% 0.12/0.14 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.13/0.35 % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.35 % DateTime : Sun Jul 10 08:56:23 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.13/0.39 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.13/0.39 The process was started by sandbox on n008.cluster.edu,
% 0.13/0.39 Sun Jul 10 08:56:23 2022
% 0.13/0.39 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 13145.
% 0.13/0.39
% 0.13/0.39 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.13/0.39 set(auto).
% 0.13/0.39 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.13/0.39 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.13/0.39 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.13/0.39 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.13/0.39 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.13/0.39 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.13/0.39 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.13/0.39 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.13/0.39 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.13/0.39 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.13/0.39 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.13/0.39 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.13/0.39 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.13/0.39 clear(print_given).
% 0.13/0.39
% 0.13/0.39 formula_list(usable).
% 0.13/0.39
% 0.13/0.39 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=7.
% 0.13/0.39
% 0.13/0.39 This ia a non-Horn set with equality. The strategy will be
% 0.13/0.39 Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, ur_res, factoring, and
% 0.13/0.39 unit deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 0.13/0.39 clauses in usable.
% 0.13/0.39
% 0.13/0.39 dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.13/0.39 dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.13/0.39 dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.13/0.39 dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.13/0.39 dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.13/0.39 dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.13/0.39 dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.13/0.39 dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.13/0.39 dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.13/0.39 dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.13/0.39 dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.13/0.39 dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.13/0.39 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.13/0.39 dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.13/0.39 dependent: set(factor).
% 0.13/0.39
% 0.13/0.39 ------------> process usable:
% 0.13/0.39 Following clause subsumed by 3 during input processing: 0 [flip.2] {-} -ilf_type(A,binary_relation_type)|union(domain_of(A),range_of(A))=field_of(A).
% 0.13/0.39
% 0.13/0.39 ------------> process sos:
% 0.13/0.39 Following clause subsumed by 132 during input processing: 0 [] {-} ilf_type($c4,set_type).
% 0.13/0.39 Following clause subsumed by 132 during input processing: 0 [] {-} ilf_type($c3,set_type).
% 0.13/0.39 132 back subsumes 109.
% 0.13/0.39 132 back subsumes 103.
% 0.13/0.39 132 back subsumes 102.
% 0.13/0.39 132 back subsumes 99.
% 0.13/0.39 132 back subsumes 90.
% 0.13/0.39 132 back subsumes 84.
% 0.13/0.39 132 back subsumes 77.
% 0.13/0.39 132 back subsumes 52.
% 0.13/0.39 132 back subsumes 50.
% 0.13/0.39 132 back subsumes 46.
% 0.13/0.39 132 back subsumes 43.
% 0.13/0.39 132 back subsumes 42.
% 0.13/0.39 132 back subsumes 39.
% 0.13/0.39 132 back subsumes 33.
% 0.13/0.39 132 back subsumes 29.
% 0.13/0.39 132 back subsumes 19.
% 0.13/0.39 132 back subsumes 18.
% 0.13/0.39 132 back subsumes 17.
% 0.13/0.39 132 back subsumes 13.
% 0.13/0.39 132 back subsumes 8.
% 0.13/0.39 132 back subsumes 7.
% 0.13/0.39 Following clause subsumed by 134 during input processing: 0 [copy,134,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.13/0.39 134 back subsumes 101.
% 0.13/0.39 134 back subsumes 100.
% 0.13/0.39 134 back subsumes 83.
% 0.13/0.39 134 back subsumes 26.
% 0.13/0.39
% 0.13/0.39 ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.13/0.43
% 0.13/0.43 Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.13/0.43
% 0.13/0.43 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.13/0.43
% 0.13/0.43
% 0.13/0.43 -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.13/0.43
% 0.13/0.43 UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.13/0.43 SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.13/0.43 SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.13/0.43 number of clauses in intial UL: 103
% 0.13/0.43 number of clauses initially in problem: 107
% 0.13/0.43 percentage of clauses intially in UL: 96
% 0.13/0.43 percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 97
% 0.13/0.43 percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.13/0.43 absolute distinct symbol count: 35
% 0.13/0.43 distinct predicate count: 6
% 0.13/0.43 distinct function count: 23
% 0.13/0.43 distinct constant count: 6
% 0.13/0.43
% 0.13/0.43 ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.13/0.43
% 0.13/0.43
% 0.13/0.43
% 0.13/0.43 Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.13/0.43
% 0.13/0.43 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.13/0.43
% 0.13/0.43 =========== start of search ===========
% 300.06/300.23 Wow, sos-wrapper got a signal XCPU
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------