TSTP Solution File: SET627+3 by Goeland---1.0.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Goeland---1.0.0
% Problem : SET627+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : goeland -dmt -presko -proof %s
% Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Sep 20 04:16:57 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.12s 0.35s
% Output : Proof 0.12s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.11 % Problem : SET627+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.2.0.
% 0.07/0.12 % Command : goeland -dmt -presko -proof %s
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Sat Sep 3 07:00:09 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.12/0.33 [DMT] DMT loaded with preskolemization
% 0.12/0.33 [EQ] equality loaded.
% 0.12/0.33 [0.000039s][1][MAIN] Problem : theBenchmark.p
% 0.12/0.33 Start search
% 0.12/0.33 nb_step : 1 - limit : 8
% 0.12/0.33 Launch Gotab with destructive = true
% 0.12/0.35 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark.p
% 0.12/0.35 [0] ALPHA_AND : (! [B3_3] : (~member(B3_3, empty_set)) & ! [B7_7, C8_8] : ((disjoint(B7_7, C8_8) <=> ~intersect(B7_7, C8_8))) & ! [B9_9, C10_10] : ((intersect(B9_9, C10_10) => intersect(C10_10, B9_9))) & ~! [B13_13] : (disjoint(B13_13, empty_set)))
% 0.12/0.35 -> [1] ! [B3_3] : (~member(B3_3, empty_set)), ! [B7_7, C8_8] : ((disjoint(B7_7, C8_8) <=> ~intersect(B7_7, C8_8))), ! [B9_9, C10_10] : ((intersect(B9_9, C10_10) => intersect(C10_10, B9_9))), ~! [B13_13] : (disjoint(B13_13, empty_set))
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 [1] DELTA_NOT_FORALL : ~! [B13_13] : (disjoint(B13_13, empty_set))
% 0.12/0.35 -> [2] ~disjoint(skolem_B1313, empty_set)
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 [2] GAMMA_FORALL : ! [B3_3] : (~member(B3_3, empty_set))
% 0.12/0.35 -> [3] ~member(skolem_D66(skolem_B1313, empty_set), empty_set)
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 [3] GAMMA_FORALL : ! [B7_7, C8_8] : ((disjoint(B7_7, C8_8) <=> ~intersect(B7_7, C8_8)))
% 0.12/0.35 -> [4] (disjoint(skolem_B1313, empty_set) <=> ~intersect(skolem_B1313, empty_set))
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 [4] BETA_EQUIV : (disjoint(skolem_B1313, empty_set) <=> ~intersect(skolem_B1313, empty_set))
% 0.12/0.35 -> [5] ~disjoint(skolem_B1313, empty_set), ~~intersect(skolem_B1313, empty_set)
% 0.12/0.35 -> [6] disjoint(skolem_B1313, empty_set), ~intersect(skolem_B1313, empty_set)
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 [6] CLOSURE : disjoint(skolem_B1313, empty_set)
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 [7] ALPHA_AND : (member(skolem_D66(skolem_B1313, empty_set), skolem_B1313) & member(skolem_D66(skolem_B1313, empty_set), empty_set))
% 0.12/0.35 -> [10] member(skolem_D66(skolem_B1313, empty_set), skolem_B1313), member(skolem_D66(skolem_B1313, empty_set), empty_set)
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 [10] CLOSURE : member(skolem_D66(skolem_B1313, empty_set), empty_set)
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 % SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark.p
% 0.12/0.35 [0.015437s][1][Res] 26 goroutines created
% 0.12/0.35 ==== Result ====
% 0.12/0.35 [0.015471s][1][Res] VALID
% 0.12/0.35 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------