TSTP Solution File: SET625+3 by ET---2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : ET---2.0
% Problem  : SET625+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_ET %s %d

% Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 00:52:39 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.30s 1.47s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.30s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    8
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   19 (   4 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   53 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    7 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   56 (  22   ~;  20   |;   9   &)
%                                         (   2 <=>;   3  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   11 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   38 (   4 sgn  21   !;   1   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(prove_th101,conjecture,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( ( intersect(X1,X2)
        & subset(X2,X3) )
     => intersect(X1,X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',prove_th101) ).

fof(subset_defn,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( subset(X1,X2)
    <=> ! [X3] :
          ( member(X3,X1)
         => member(X3,X2) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',subset_defn) ).

fof(intersect_defn,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( intersect(X1,X2)
    <=> ? [X3] :
          ( member(X3,X1)
          & member(X3,X2) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',intersect_defn) ).

fof(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1,X2,X3] :
        ( ( intersect(X1,X2)
          & subset(X2,X3) )
       => intersect(X1,X3) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[prove_th101]) ).

fof(c_0_4,plain,
    ! [X4,X5,X6,X4,X5] :
      ( ( ~ subset(X4,X5)
        | ~ member(X6,X4)
        | member(X6,X5) )
      & ( member(esk2_2(X4,X5),X4)
        | subset(X4,X5) )
      & ( ~ member(esk2_2(X4,X5),X5)
        | subset(X4,X5) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[subset_defn])])])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
    ( intersect(esk3_0,esk4_0)
    & subset(esk4_0,esk5_0)
    & ~ intersect(esk3_0,esk5_0) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_3])])]) ).

fof(c_0_6,plain,
    ! [X4,X5,X4,X5,X7] :
      ( ( member(esk1_2(X4,X5),X4)
        | ~ intersect(X4,X5) )
      & ( member(esk1_2(X4,X5),X5)
        | ~ intersect(X4,X5) )
      & ( ~ member(X7,X4)
        | ~ member(X7,X5)
        | intersect(X4,X5) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[intersect_defn])])])])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_7,plain,
    ( member(X1,X2)
    | ~ member(X1,X3)
    | ~ subset(X3,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
    subset(esk4_0,esk5_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,plain,
    ( intersect(X1,X2)
    | ~ member(X3,X2)
    | ~ member(X3,X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
    ( member(X1,esk5_0)
    | ~ member(X1,esk4_0) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
    ( intersect(X1,esk5_0)
    | ~ member(X2,esk4_0)
    | ~ member(X2,X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    ( member(esk1_2(X1,X2),X2)
    | ~ intersect(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
    ( intersect(X1,esk5_0)
    | ~ member(esk1_2(X2,esk4_0),X1)
    | ~ intersect(X2,esk4_0) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    ( member(esk1_2(X1,X2),X1)
    | ~ intersect(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
    ~ intersect(esk3_0,esk5_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
    ( intersect(X1,esk5_0)
    | ~ intersect(X1,esk4_0) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
    intersect(esk3_0,esk4_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]),c_0_17])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.14  % Problem  : SET625+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.2.0.
% 0.08/0.15  % Command  : run_ET %s %d
% 0.16/0.37  % Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% 0.16/0.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.16/0.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.16/0.37  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.16/0.37  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.16/0.37  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.16/0.37  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.16/0.37  % DateTime : Sun Jul 10 11:13:06 EDT 2022
% 0.16/0.37  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.30/1.47  # Running protocol protocol_eprover_4a02c828a8cc55752123edbcc1ad40e453c11447 for 23 seconds:
% 0.30/1.47  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.4,,04,100,1.0)
% 0.30/1.47  # Preprocessing time       : 0.014 s
% 0.30/1.47  
% 0.30/1.47  # Failure: Out of unprocessed clauses!
% 0.30/1.47  # OLD status GaveUp
% 0.30/1.47  # Parsed axioms                        : 5
% 0.30/1.47  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 2
% 0.30/1.47  # Initial clauses                      : 5
% 0.30/1.47  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.30/1.47  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 5
% 0.30/1.47  # Processed clauses                    : 6
% 0.30/1.47  # ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 0.30/1.47  # ...subsumed                          : 0
% 0.30/1.47  # ...remaining for further processing  : 6
% 0.30/1.47  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.30/1.47  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.30/1.47  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.30/1.47  # Backward-rewritten                   : 0
% 0.30/1.47  # Generated clauses                    : 2
% 0.30/1.47  # ...of the previous two non-trivial   : 1
% 0.30/1.47  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.30/1.47  # Paramodulations                      : 2
% 0.30/1.47  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.30/1.47  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.30/1.47  # Current number of processed clauses  : 6
% 0.30/1.47  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 4
% 0.30/1.47  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.30/1.47  #    Negative unit clauses             : 1
% 0.30/1.47  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 1
% 0.30/1.47  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.30/1.47  # ...number of literals in the above   : 0
% 0.30/1.47  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.30/1.47  # Current number of archived clauses   : 0
% 0.30/1.47  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.30/1.47  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.30/1.47  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
% 0.30/1.47  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.30/1.47  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.30/1.47  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 0
% 0.30/1.47  # BW rewrite match successes           : 0
% 0.30/1.47  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.30/1.47  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.30/1.47  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 223
% 0.30/1.47  
% 0.30/1.47  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.30/1.47  # User time                : 0.011 s
% 0.30/1.47  # System time              : 0.003 s
% 0.30/1.47  # Total time               : 0.015 s
% 0.30/1.47  # Maximum resident set size: 2764 pages
% 0.30/1.47  # Running protocol protocol_eprover_f171197f65f27d1ba69648a20c844832c84a5dd7 for 23 seconds:
% 0.30/1.47  # Preprocessing time       : 0.014 s
% 0.30/1.47  
% 0.30/1.47  # Proof found!
% 0.30/1.47  # SZS status Theorem
% 0.30/1.47  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.30/1.47  # Proof object total steps             : 19
% 0.30/1.47  # Proof object clause steps            : 12
% 0.30/1.47  # Proof object formula steps           : 7
% 0.30/1.47  # Proof object conjectures             : 11
% 0.30/1.47  # Proof object clause conjectures      : 8
% 0.30/1.47  # Proof object formula conjectures     : 3
% 0.30/1.47  # Proof object initial clauses used    : 7
% 0.30/1.47  # Proof object initial formulas used   : 3
% 0.30/1.47  # Proof object generating inferences   : 5
% 0.30/1.47  # Proof object simplifying inferences  : 2
% 0.30/1.47  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.30/1.47  # Parsed axioms                        : 5
% 0.30/1.47  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.30/1.47  # Initial clauses                      : 11
% 0.30/1.47  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.30/1.47  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 11
% 0.30/1.47  # Processed clauses                    : 24
% 0.30/1.47  # ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 0.30/1.47  # ...subsumed                          : 0
% 0.30/1.47  # ...remaining for further processing  : 24
% 0.30/1.47  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.30/1.47  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.30/1.47  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.30/1.47  # Backward-rewritten                   : 1
% 0.30/1.47  # Generated clauses                    : 35
% 0.30/1.47  # ...of the previous two non-trivial   : 21
% 0.30/1.47  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.30/1.47  # Paramodulations                      : 35
% 0.30/1.47  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.30/1.47  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.30/1.47  # Current number of processed clauses  : 23
% 0.30/1.47  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 8
% 0.30/1.47  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.30/1.47  #    Negative unit clauses             : 1
% 0.30/1.47  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 14
% 0.30/1.47  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 7
% 0.30/1.47  # ...number of literals in the above   : 19
% 0.30/1.47  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.30/1.47  # Current number of archived clauses   : 1
% 0.30/1.47  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 28
% 0.30/1.47  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 28
% 0.30/1.47  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
% 0.30/1.47  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.30/1.47  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.30/1.47  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 2
% 0.30/1.47  # BW rewrite match successes           : 1
% 0.30/1.47  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.30/1.47  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.30/1.47  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 896
% 0.30/1.47  
% 0.30/1.47  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.30/1.47  # User time                : 0.014 s
% 0.30/1.47  # System time              : 0.002 s
% 0.30/1.47  # Total time               : 0.016 s
% 0.30/1.47  # Maximum resident set size: 2768 pages
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------