TSTP Solution File: SET620+3 by Enigma---0.5.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : SET620+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 00:12:53 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 8.25s 2.50s
% Output : CNFRefutation 8.25s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 14 ( 14 unt; 0 nHn; 3 RR)
% Number of literals : 14 ( 13 equ; 2 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 4 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 0 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 2 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 25 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_3,plain,
union(difference(X1,X2),difference(X3,X2)) = difference(union(X1,X3),X2),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-u3jmxq9z/lgb.p',i_0_3) ).
cnf(i_0_2,plain,
difference(X1,intersection(X1,X2)) = difference(X1,X2),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-u3jmxq9z/lgb.p',i_0_2) ).
cnf(i_0_16,plain,
union(X1,X2) = union(X2,X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-u3jmxq9z/lgb.p',i_0_16) ).
cnf(i_0_17,plain,
intersection(X1,X2) = intersection(X2,X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-u3jmxq9z/lgb.p',i_0_17) ).
cnf(i_0_27,negated_conjecture,
difference(union(esk3_0,esk4_0),intersection(esk3_0,esk4_0)) != union(difference(esk3_0,esk4_0),difference(esk4_0,esk3_0)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-u3jmxq9z/lgb.p',i_0_27) ).
cnf(c_0_33,plain,
union(difference(X1,X2),difference(X3,X2)) = difference(union(X1,X3),X2),
i_0_3 ).
cnf(c_0_34,plain,
difference(X1,intersection(X1,X2)) = difference(X1,X2),
i_0_2 ).
cnf(c_0_35,plain,
union(X1,X2) = union(X2,X1),
i_0_16 ).
cnf(c_0_36,plain,
intersection(X1,X2) = intersection(X2,X1),
i_0_17 ).
cnf(c_0_37,plain,
union(difference(X1,X2),difference(X3,intersection(X1,X2))) = difference(union(X3,X1),intersection(X1,X2)),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_33,c_0_34]),c_0_35]) ).
cnf(c_0_38,plain,
difference(X1,intersection(X2,X1)) = difference(X1,X2),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_34,c_0_36]) ).
cnf(c_0_39,negated_conjecture,
difference(union(esk3_0,esk4_0),intersection(esk3_0,esk4_0)) != union(difference(esk3_0,esk4_0),difference(esk4_0,esk3_0)),
i_0_27 ).
cnf(c_0_40,plain,
union(difference(X1,X2),difference(X2,X1)) = difference(union(X2,X1),intersection(X1,X2)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_37,c_0_38]) ).
cnf(c_0_41,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_39,c_0_40]),c_0_35])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : SET620+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.2.0.
% 0.03/0.13 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Mon Jul 11 05:49:52 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.45 # ENIGMATIC: Selected complete mode:
% 8.25/2.50 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 8.25/2.50 # No SInE strategy applied
% 8.25/2.50 # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 8.25/2.50 # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic C12_02_nc_SAT001_MinMin_rr
% 8.25/2.50 # and selection function SelectMaxLComplexAvoidPosPred.
% 8.25/2.50 #
% 8.25/2.50 # Preprocessing time : 0.023 s
% 8.25/2.50 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 8.25/2.50
% 8.25/2.50 # Proof found!
% 8.25/2.50 # SZS status Theorem
% 8.25/2.50 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 8.25/2.50 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 8.25/2.50
% 8.25/2.50 # -------------------------------------------------
% 8.25/2.50 # User time : 0.053 s
% 8.25/2.50 # System time : 0.006 s
% 8.25/2.50 # Total time : 0.059 s
% 8.25/2.50 # Maximum resident set size: 7124 pages
% 8.25/2.50
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------