TSTP Solution File: SET614^5 by E---3.1.00
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1.00
% Problem : SET614^5 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 21 02:54:56 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 0.15s 0.42s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.15s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.09 % Problem : SET614^5 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.04/0.10 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.09/0.30 % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.30 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.30 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.30 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.09/0.30 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.09/0.30 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.30 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.09/0.30 % DateTime : Mon May 20 13:16:38 EDT 2024
% 0.09/0.30 % CPUTime :
% 0.15/0.41 Running higher-order theorem proving
% 0.15/0.41 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.15/0.42 # Version: 3.1.0-ho
% 0.15/0.42 # Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNSSN.
% 0.15/0.42 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.42 # Starting ehoh_best_nonlift_nonlambdatoforall with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.42 # Starting post_as_ho10 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.42 # Starting new_bool_9 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.42 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.42 # new_bool_9 with pid 13979 completed with status 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Result found by new_bool_9
% 0.15/0.42 # Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNSSN.
% 0.15/0.42 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.42 # Starting ehoh_best_nonlift_nonlambdatoforall with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.42 # Starting post_as_ho10 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.42 # Starting new_bool_9 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.42 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1,,2,20000,1.0)
% 0.15/0.42 # Search class: HUUPF-FFSF00-MSSFFFNN
% 0.15/0.42 # partial match(1): HUUPF-FFSF00-SSSFFFNN
% 0.15/0.42 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.15/0.42 # Starting new_ho_10 with 181s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.42 # new_ho_10 with pid 13982 completed with status 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Result found by new_ho_10
% 0.15/0.42 # Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNSSN.
% 0.15/0.42 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.42 # Starting ehoh_best_nonlift_nonlambdatoforall with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.42 # Starting post_as_ho10 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.42 # Starting new_bool_9 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.42 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1,,2,20000,1.0)
% 0.15/0.42 # Search class: HUUPF-FFSF00-MSSFFFNN
% 0.15/0.42 # partial match(1): HUUPF-FFSF00-SSSFFFNN
% 0.15/0.42 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.15/0.42 # Starting new_ho_10 with 181s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.42 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.15/0.42 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.15/0.42
% 0.15/0.42 # Proof found!
% 0.15/0.42 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.15/0.42 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% 0.15/0.42 thf(decl_sort1, type, a: $tType).
% 0.15/0.42 thf(decl_22, type, epred1_0: a > $o).
% 0.15/0.42 thf(decl_23, type, epred2_0: a > $o).
% 0.15/0.42 thf(decl_24, type, epred3_0: a > $o).
% 0.15/0.42 thf(decl_25, type, esk1_0: a).
% 0.15/0.42 thf(cBOOL_PROP_88_pme, conjecture, ![X1:a > $o, X2:a > $o, X3:a > $o]:(((^[X4:a]:((((X1 @ X4)&~((X2 @ X4)))&~((X3 @ X4)))))=(^[X4:a]:(((X1 @ X4)&~(((X2 @ X4)|(X3 @ X4)))))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', cBOOL_PROP_88_pme)).
% 0.15/0.42 thf(c_0_1, negated_conjecture, ~(![X1:a > $o, X2:a > $o, X3:a > $o]:(((^[Z0/* 8 */:a]:(((X1 @ Z0&~(X2 @ Z0))&~(X3 @ Z0))))=(^[Z0/* 8 */:a]:((X1 @ Z0&~((X2 @ Z0|X3 @ Z0)))))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[cBOOL_PROP_88_pme])])).
% 0.15/0.42 thf(c_0_2, negated_conjecture, ((^[Z0/* 8 */:a]:(((epred1_0 @ Z0&~(epred2_0 @ Z0))&~(epred3_0 @ Z0))))!=(^[Z0/* 8 */:a]:((epred1_0 @ Z0&~((epred2_0 @ Z0|epred3_0 @ Z0)))))), inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_1])])])])).
% 0.15/0.42 thf(c_0_3, negated_conjecture, ((^[Z0/* 8 */:a]:((((epred1_0 @ Z0)&~((epred2_0 @ Z0)))&~((epred3_0 @ Z0)))))!=(^[Z0/* 8 */:a]:(((epred1_0 @ Z0)&~(((epred2_0 @ Z0)|(epred3_0 @ Z0))))))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])).
% 0.15/0.42 thf(c_0_4, negated_conjecture, (((epred1_0 @ esk1_0)&~(((epred2_0 @ esk1_0)|(epred3_0 @ esk1_0))))<~>(((epred1_0 @ esk1_0)&~((epred2_0 @ esk1_0)))&~((epred3_0 @ esk1_0)))), inference(neg_ext,[status(thm)],[c_0_3])).
% 0.15/0.42 thf(c_0_5, negated_conjecture, (epred1_0 @ esk1_0), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(dynamic_cnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])])).
% 0.15/0.42 thf(c_0_6, negated_conjecture, ~((epred2_0 @ esk1_0)), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(dynamic_cnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])])).
% 0.15/0.42 thf(c_0_7, negated_conjecture, ~((epred3_0 @ esk1_0)), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(dynamic_cnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])])).
% 0.15/0.42 thf(c_0_8, negated_conjecture, ($false), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(dynamic_cnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])]), c_0_5])]), c_0_6]), c_0_7]), ['proof']).
% 0.15/0.42 # SZS output end CNFRefutation
% 0.15/0.42 # Parsed axioms : 2
% 0.15/0.42 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 1
% 0.15/0.42 # Initial clauses : 1
% 0.15/0.42 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Initial clauses in saturation : 1
% 0.15/0.42 # Processed clauses : 13
% 0.15/0.42 # ...of these trivial : 4
% 0.15/0.42 # ...subsumed : 2
% 0.15/0.42 # ...remaining for further processing : 6
% 0.15/0.42 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Generated clauses : 11
% 0.15/0.42 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 11
% 0.15/0.42 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Paramodulations : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # NegExts : 1
% 0.15/0.42 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Total rewrite steps : 5
% 0.15/0.42 # ...of those cached : 4
% 0.15/0.42 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.42 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.42 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.42 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.42 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.42 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.42 # Current number of processed clauses : 4
% 0.15/0.42 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 1
% 0.15/0.42 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Negative unit clauses : 3
% 0.15/0.42 # Non-unit-clauses : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.15/0.42 # ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Current number of archived clauses : 2
% 0.15/0.42 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2
% 0.15/0.42 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Condensation attempts : 13
% 0.15/0.42 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Termbank termtop insertions : 595
% 0.15/0.42 # Search garbage collected termcells : 67
% 0.15/0.42
% 0.15/0.42 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.15/0.42 # User time : 0.001 s
% 0.15/0.42 # System time : 0.002 s
% 0.15/0.42 # Total time : 0.003 s
% 0.15/0.42 # Maximum resident set size: 1812 pages
% 0.15/0.42
% 0.15/0.42 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.15/0.42 # User time : 0.001 s
% 0.15/0.42 # System time : 0.004 s
% 0.15/0.42 # Total time : 0.005 s
% 0.15/0.42 # Maximum resident set size: 1724 pages
% 0.15/0.42 % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.15/0.42 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------