%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Twee---2.4.2
% Problem  : SET599+3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : parallel-twee %s --tstp --conditional-encoding if --smaller --drop-non-horn --give-up-on-saturation --explain-encoding --formal-proof

% Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 15:32:35 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 0.22s 0.42s
% Output   : Proof 0.22s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.14  % Problem  : SET599+3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.2.0.
% 0.15/0.15  % Command  : parallel-twee %s --tstp --conditional-encoding if --smaller --drop-non-horn --give-up-on-saturation --explain-encoding --formal-proof
% 0.16/0.37  % Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% 0.16/0.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.16/0.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.16/0.37  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.16/0.37  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.16/0.37  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.16/0.37  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.16/0.37  % DateTime : Sat Aug 26 14:17:54 EDT 2023
% 0.16/0.37  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.22/0.42  Command-line arguments: --no-flatten-goal
% 0.22/0.42  
% 0.22/0.42  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.22/0.42  
% 0.22/0.42  % SZS output start Proof
% 0.22/0.42  Take the following subset of the input axioms:
% 0.22/0.42    fof(prove_th58, conjecture, ![B, C]: subset(difference(B, C), symmetric_difference(B, C))).
% 0.22/0.42    fof(subset_of_union, axiom, ![B2, C2]: subset(B2, union(B2, C2))).
% 0.22/0.42    fof(symmetric_difference_defn, axiom, ![B2, C2]: symmetric_difference(B2, C2)=union(difference(B2, C2), difference(C2, B2))).
% 0.22/0.42  
% 0.22/0.42  Now clausify the problem and encode Horn clauses using encoding 3 of
% 0.22/0.42  http://www.cse.chalmers.se/~nicsma/papers/horn.pdf.
% 0.22/0.42  We repeatedly replace C & s=t => u=v by the two clauses:
% 0.22/0.42    fresh(y, y, x1...xn) = u
% 0.22/0.42    C => fresh(s, t, x1...xn) = v
% 0.22/0.42  where fresh is a fresh function symbol and x1..xn are the free
% 0.22/0.42  variables of u and v.
% 0.22/0.42  A predicate p(X) is encoded as p(X)=true (this is sound, because the
% 0.22/0.42  input problem has no model of domain size 1).
% 0.22/0.42  
% 0.22/0.42  The encoding turns the above axioms into the following unit equations and goals:
% 0.22/0.42  
% 0.22/0.42  Axiom 1 (subset_of_union): subset(X, union(X, Y)) = true2.
% 0.22/0.42  Axiom 2 (symmetric_difference_defn): symmetric_difference(X, Y) = union(difference(X, Y), difference(Y, X)).
% 0.22/0.42  
% 0.22/0.42  Goal 1 (prove_th58): subset(difference(b, c), symmetric_difference(b, c)) = true2.
% 0.22/0.42  Proof:
% 0.22/0.42    subset(difference(b, c), symmetric_difference(b, c))
% 0.22/0.42  = { by axiom 2 (symmetric_difference_defn) }
% 0.22/0.42    subset(difference(b, c), union(difference(b, c), difference(c, b)))
% 0.22/0.42  = { by axiom 1 (subset_of_union) }
% 0.22/0.42    true2
% 0.22/0.42  % SZS output end Proof
% 0.22/0.42  
% 0.22/0.42  RESULT: Theorem (the conjecture is true).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------