TSTP Solution File: SET599+3 by Metis---2.4

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Metis---2.4
% Problem  : SET599+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : metis --show proof --show saturation %s

% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 03:35:47 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.13s 0.36s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.13s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    9
%            Number of leaves      :    6
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   26 (  21 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   33 (  15 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   18 (  11   ~;   7   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   43 (   1 sgn  18   !;   2   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(symmetric_difference_defn,axiom,
    ! [B,C] : symmetric_difference(B,C) = union(difference(B,C),difference(C,B)) ).

fof(subset_of_union,axiom,
    ! [B,C] : subset(B,union(B,C)) ).

fof(prove_th58,conjecture,
    ! [B,C] : subset(difference(B,C),symmetric_difference(B,C)) ).

fof(subgoal_0,plain,
    ! [B,C] : subset(difference(B,C),symmetric_difference(B,C)),
    inference(strip,[],[prove_th58]) ).

fof(negate_0_0,plain,
    ~ ! [B,C] : subset(difference(B,C),symmetric_difference(B,C)),
    inference(negate,[],[subgoal_0]) ).

fof(normalize_0_0,plain,
    ? [B,C] : ~ subset(difference(B,C),symmetric_difference(B,C)),
    inference(canonicalize,[],[negate_0_0]) ).

fof(normalize_0_1,plain,
    ~ subset(difference(skolemFOFtoCNF_B,skolemFOFtoCNF_C),symmetric_difference(skolemFOFtoCNF_B,skolemFOFtoCNF_C)),
    inference(skolemize,[],[normalize_0_0]) ).

fof(normalize_0_2,plain,
    ! [B,C] : subset(B,union(B,C)),
    inference(canonicalize,[],[subset_of_union]) ).

fof(normalize_0_3,plain,
    ! [B,C] : subset(B,union(B,C)),
    inference(specialize,[],[normalize_0_2]) ).

fof(normalize_0_4,plain,
    ! [B,C] : symmetric_difference(B,C) = union(difference(B,C),difference(C,B)),
    inference(canonicalize,[],[symmetric_difference_defn]) ).

fof(normalize_0_5,plain,
    ! [B,C] : symmetric_difference(B,C) = union(difference(B,C),difference(C,B)),
    inference(specialize,[],[normalize_0_4]) ).

cnf(refute_0_0,plain,
    ~ subset(difference(skolemFOFtoCNF_B,skolemFOFtoCNF_C),symmetric_difference(skolemFOFtoCNF_B,skolemFOFtoCNF_C)),
    inference(canonicalize,[],[normalize_0_1]) ).

cnf(refute_0_1,plain,
    subset(B,union(B,C)),
    inference(canonicalize,[],[normalize_0_3]) ).

cnf(refute_0_2,plain,
    subset(difference(X_9,X_10),union(difference(X_9,X_10),difference(X_10,X_9))),
    inference(subst,[],[refute_0_1:[bind(B,$fot(difference(X_9,X_10))),bind(C,$fot(difference(X_10,X_9)))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_3,plain,
    symmetric_difference(B,C) = union(difference(B,C),difference(C,B)),
    inference(canonicalize,[],[normalize_0_5]) ).

cnf(refute_0_4,plain,
    symmetric_difference(X_9,X_10) = union(difference(X_9,X_10),difference(X_10,X_9)),
    inference(subst,[],[refute_0_3:[bind(B,$fot(X_9)),bind(C,$fot(X_10))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_5,plain,
    X = X,
    introduced(tautology,[refl,[$fot(X)]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_6,plain,
    ( X != X
    | X != Y
    | Y = X ),
    introduced(tautology,[equality,[$cnf( $equal(X,X) ),[0],$fot(Y)]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_7,plain,
    ( X != Y
    | Y = X ),
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( $equal(X,X) )],[refute_0_5,refute_0_6]) ).

cnf(refute_0_8,plain,
    ( symmetric_difference(X_9,X_10) != union(difference(X_9,X_10),difference(X_10,X_9))
    | union(difference(X_9,X_10),difference(X_10,X_9)) = symmetric_difference(X_9,X_10) ),
    inference(subst,[],[refute_0_7:[bind(X,$fot(symmetric_difference(X_9,X_10))),bind(Y,$fot(union(difference(X_9,X_10),difference(X_10,X_9))))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_9,plain,
    union(difference(X_9,X_10),difference(X_10,X_9)) = symmetric_difference(X_9,X_10),
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( $equal(symmetric_difference(X_9,X_10),union(difference(X_9,X_10),difference(X_10,X_9))) )],[refute_0_4,refute_0_8]) ).

cnf(refute_0_10,plain,
    ( union(difference(X_9,X_10),difference(X_10,X_9)) != symmetric_difference(X_9,X_10)
    | ~ subset(difference(X_9,X_10),union(difference(X_9,X_10),difference(X_10,X_9)))
    | subset(difference(X_9,X_10),symmetric_difference(X_9,X_10)) ),
    introduced(tautology,[equality,[$cnf( subset(difference(X_9,X_10),union(difference(X_9,X_10),difference(X_10,X_9))) ),[1],$fot(symmetric_difference(X_9,X_10))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_11,plain,
    ( ~ subset(difference(X_9,X_10),union(difference(X_9,X_10),difference(X_10,X_9)))
    | subset(difference(X_9,X_10),symmetric_difference(X_9,X_10)) ),
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( $equal(union(difference(X_9,X_10),difference(X_10,X_9)),symmetric_difference(X_9,X_10)) )],[refute_0_9,refute_0_10]) ).

cnf(refute_0_12,plain,
    subset(difference(X_9,X_10),symmetric_difference(X_9,X_10)),
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( subset(difference(X_9,X_10),union(difference(X_9,X_10),difference(X_10,X_9))) )],[refute_0_2,refute_0_11]) ).

cnf(refute_0_13,plain,
    subset(difference(skolemFOFtoCNF_B,skolemFOFtoCNF_C),symmetric_difference(skolemFOFtoCNF_B,skolemFOFtoCNF_C)),
    inference(subst,[],[refute_0_12:[bind(X_10,$fot(skolemFOFtoCNF_C)),bind(X_9,$fot(skolemFOFtoCNF_B))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_14,plain,
    $false,
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( subset(difference(skolemFOFtoCNF_B,skolemFOFtoCNF_C),symmetric_difference(skolemFOFtoCNF_B,skolemFOFtoCNF_C)) )],[refute_0_13,refute_0_0]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.12  % Problem  : SET599+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.2.0.
% 0.04/0.13  % Command  : metis --show proof --show saturation %s
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Sun Jul 10 21:33:23 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.13/0.35  %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
% 0.13/0.36  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.13/0.36  
% 0.13/0.36  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 0.13/0.36  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------