TSTP Solution File: SET596+3 by SInE---0.4
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SInE---0.4
% Problem : SET596+3 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v2.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : Source/sine.py -e eprover -t %d %s
% Computer : art04.cs.miami.edu
% Model : i686 i686
% CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory : 2018MB
% OS : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Dec 26 02:59:52 EST 2010
% Result : Theorem 0.23s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.23s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 12
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 27 ( 11 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 48 ( 22 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 37 ( 16 ~; 9 |; 8 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 4 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 7 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 4 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 37 ( 0 sgn 22 !; 6 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(1,axiom,
! [X1,X2,X3] :
( subset(X1,X2)
=> subset(intersection(X1,X3),intersection(X2,X3)) ),
file('/tmp/tmpevv1gx/sel_SET596+3.p_1',intersection_of_subset) ).
fof(2,conjecture,
! [X1,X2,X3] :
( ( subset(X1,X2)
& intersection(X2,X3) = empty_set )
=> intersection(X1,X3) = empty_set ),
file('/tmp/tmpevv1gx/sel_SET596+3.p_1',prove_th55) ).
fof(3,axiom,
! [X1,X2] : intersection(X1,X2) = intersection(X2,X1),
file('/tmp/tmpevv1gx/sel_SET596+3.p_1',commutativity_of_intersection) ).
fof(9,axiom,
! [X1] :
( subset(X1,empty_set)
=> X1 = empty_set ),
file('/tmp/tmpevv1gx/sel_SET596+3.p_1',subset_of_empty_set_is_empty_set) ).
fof(12,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X1,X2,X3] :
( ( subset(X1,X2)
& intersection(X2,X3) = empty_set )
=> intersection(X1,X3) = empty_set ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[2]) ).
fof(15,plain,
! [X1,X2,X3] :
( ~ subset(X1,X2)
| subset(intersection(X1,X3),intersection(X2,X3)) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[1]) ).
fof(16,plain,
! [X4,X5,X6] :
( ~ subset(X4,X5)
| subset(intersection(X4,X6),intersection(X5,X6)) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[15]) ).
cnf(17,plain,
( subset(intersection(X1,X2),intersection(X3,X2))
| ~ subset(X1,X3) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[16]) ).
fof(18,negated_conjecture,
? [X1,X2,X3] :
( subset(X1,X2)
& intersection(X2,X3) = empty_set
& intersection(X1,X3) != empty_set ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[12]) ).
fof(19,negated_conjecture,
? [X4,X5,X6] :
( subset(X4,X5)
& intersection(X5,X6) = empty_set
& intersection(X4,X6) != empty_set ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[18]) ).
fof(20,negated_conjecture,
( subset(esk1_0,esk2_0)
& intersection(esk2_0,esk3_0) = empty_set
& intersection(esk1_0,esk3_0) != empty_set ),
inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[19]) ).
cnf(21,negated_conjecture,
intersection(esk1_0,esk3_0) != empty_set,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[20]) ).
cnf(22,negated_conjecture,
intersection(esk2_0,esk3_0) = empty_set,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[20]) ).
cnf(23,negated_conjecture,
subset(esk1_0,esk2_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[20]) ).
fof(24,plain,
! [X3,X4] : intersection(X3,X4) = intersection(X4,X3),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[3]) ).
cnf(25,plain,
intersection(X1,X2) = intersection(X2,X1),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[24]) ).
fof(61,plain,
! [X1] :
( ~ subset(X1,empty_set)
| X1 = empty_set ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[9]) ).
fof(62,plain,
! [X2] :
( ~ subset(X2,empty_set)
| X2 = empty_set ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[61]) ).
cnf(63,plain,
( X1 = empty_set
| ~ subset(X1,empty_set) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[62]) ).
cnf(73,negated_conjecture,
intersection(esk3_0,esk1_0) != empty_set,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[21,25,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(77,negated_conjecture,
( subset(intersection(X1,esk3_0),empty_set)
| ~ subset(X1,esk2_0) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[17,22,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(139,negated_conjecture,
( empty_set = intersection(X1,esk3_0)
| ~ subset(X1,esk2_0) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[63,77,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(147,negated_conjecture,
( empty_set = intersection(esk3_0,X1)
| ~ subset(X1,esk2_0) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[25,139,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(274,negated_conjecture,
~ subset(esk1_0,esk2_0),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[73,147,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(286,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[274,23,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(287,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[286,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(288,negated_conjecture,
$false,
287,
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% % SZS status Started for /home/graph/tptp/TPTP/Problems/SET/SET596+3.p
% --creating new selector for []
% -running prover on /tmp/tmpevv1gx/sel_SET596+3.p_1 with time limit 29
% -prover status Theorem
% Problem SET596+3.p solved in phase 0.
% % SZS status Theorem for /home/graph/tptp/TPTP/Problems/SET/SET596+3.p
% % SZS status Ended for /home/graph/tptp/TPTP/Problems/SET/SET596+3.p
% Solved 1 out of 1.
% # Problem is unsatisfiable (or provable), constructing proof object
% # SZS status Theorem
% # SZS output start CNFRefutation.
% See solution above
% # SZS output end CNFRefutation
%
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------