TSTP Solution File: SET576+3 by Beagle---0.9.51

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Beagle---0.9.51
% Problem  : SET576+3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s

% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Aug 22 10:56:36 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 2.33s 1.64s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 2.84s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    5
%            Number of leaves      :    9
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   18 (   4 unt;   6 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   22 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   21 (  11   ~;   5   |;   1   &)
%                                         (   2 <=>;   2  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    8 (   4   >;   4   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    3 (   3 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   16 (;  15   !;   1   ?;   0   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%$ member > intersect > disjoint > #nlpp > #skF_2 > #skF_3 > #skF_1

%Foreground sorts:

%Background operators:

%Foreground operators:
tff(intersect,type,
    intersect: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(member,type,
    member: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff('#skF_2',type,
    '#skF_2': $i ).

tff('#skF_3',type,
    '#skF_3': $i ).

tff(disjoint,type,
    disjoint: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff('#skF_1',type,
    '#skF_1': ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(f_55,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [B,C] :
        ( ! [D] :
            ( member(D,B)
           => ~ member(D,C) )
       => disjoint(B,C) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_th17) ).

tff(f_40,axiom,
    ! [B,C] :
      ( disjoint(B,C)
    <=> ~ intersect(B,C) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',disjoint_defn) ).

tff(f_34,axiom,
    ! [B,C] :
      ( intersect(B,C)
    <=> ? [D] :
          ( member(D,B)
          & member(D,C) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',intersect_defn) ).

tff(c_14,plain,
    ~ disjoint('#skF_2','#skF_3'),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_55]) ).

tff(c_10,plain,
    ! [B_6,C_7] :
      ( disjoint(B_6,C_7)
      | intersect(B_6,C_7) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_40]) ).

tff(c_4,plain,
    ! [B_1,C_2] :
      ( member('#skF_1'(B_1,C_2),C_2)
      | ~ intersect(B_1,C_2) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_34]) ).

tff(c_28,plain,
    ! [B_19,C_20] :
      ( member('#skF_1'(B_19,C_20),B_19)
      | ~ intersect(B_19,C_20) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_34]) ).

tff(c_16,plain,
    ! [D_11] :
      ( ~ member(D_11,'#skF_3')
      | ~ member(D_11,'#skF_2') ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_55]) ).

tff(c_49,plain,
    ! [C_27] :
      ( ~ member('#skF_1'('#skF_2',C_27),'#skF_3')
      | ~ intersect('#skF_2',C_27) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_28,c_16]) ).

tff(c_54,plain,
    ~ intersect('#skF_2','#skF_3'),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_4,c_49]) ).

tff(c_60,plain,
    disjoint('#skF_2','#skF_3'),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_10,c_54]) ).

tff(c_65,plain,
    $false,
    inference(negUnitSimplification,[status(thm)],[c_14,c_60]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.13  % Problem  : SET576+3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.2.0.
% 0.00/0.14  % Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% 0.15/0.36  % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.36  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.36  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.15/0.36  % DateTime : Thu Aug  3 16:35:16 EDT 2023
% 0.15/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 2.33/1.64  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 2.33/1.65  
% 2.33/1.65  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 2.84/1.67  
% 2.84/1.67  Inference rules
% 2.84/1.67  ----------------------
% 2.84/1.67  #Ref     : 0
% 2.84/1.67  #Sup     : 9
% 2.84/1.67  #Fact    : 0
% 2.84/1.67  #Define  : 0
% 2.84/1.67  #Split   : 0
% 2.84/1.67  #Chain   : 0
% 2.84/1.67  #Close   : 0
% 2.84/1.67  
% 2.84/1.67  Ordering : KBO
% 2.84/1.67  
% 2.84/1.67  Simplification rules
% 2.84/1.67  ----------------------
% 2.84/1.67  #Subsume      : 1
% 2.84/1.67  #Demod        : 0
% 2.84/1.67  #Tautology    : 1
% 2.84/1.67  #SimpNegUnit  : 1
% 2.84/1.67  #BackRed      : 0
% 2.84/1.67  
% 2.84/1.67  #Partial instantiations: 0
% 2.84/1.67  #Strategies tried      : 1
% 2.84/1.67  
% 2.84/1.67  Timing (in seconds)
% 2.84/1.67  ----------------------
% 2.84/1.68  Preprocessing        : 0.42
% 2.84/1.68  Parsing              : 0.24
% 2.84/1.68  CNF conversion       : 0.03
% 2.84/1.68  Main loop            : 0.19
% 2.84/1.68  Inferencing          : 0.10
% 2.84/1.68  Reduction            : 0.02
% 2.84/1.68  Demodulation         : 0.01
% 2.84/1.68  BG Simplification    : 0.01
% 2.84/1.68  Subsumption          : 0.04
% 2.84/1.68  Abstraction          : 0.01
% 2.84/1.68  MUC search           : 0.00
% 2.84/1.68  Cooper               : 0.00
% 2.84/1.68  Total                : 0.65
% 2.84/1.68  Index Insertion      : 0.00
% 2.84/1.68  Index Deletion       : 0.00
% 2.84/1.68  Index Matching       : 0.00
% 2.84/1.68  BG Taut test         : 0.00
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------