TSTP Solution File: SET563-6 by E---3.1.00
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1.00
% Problem : SET563-6 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sat May 4 09:18:59 EDT 2024
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.18s 0.46s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.18s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 15 ( 9 unt; 0 nHn; 15 RR)
% Number of literals : 21 ( 4 equ; 9 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 7 ( 7 usr; 5 con; 0-1 aty)
% Number of variables : 18 ( 6 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(compatible2,axiom,
( domain_of(domain_of(X2)) = domain_of(X1)
| ~ compatible(X1,X2,X3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.9elbWJZAFT/E---3.1_24838.p',compatible2) ).
cnf(compatible3,axiom,
( subclass(range_of(X1),domain_of(domain_of(X3)))
| ~ compatible(X1,X2,X3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.9elbWJZAFT/E---3.1_24838.p',compatible3) ).
cnf(prove_compatible_function_property3_2,negated_conjecture,
compatible(xh2,xf2,xf3),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.9elbWJZAFT/E---3.1_24838.p',prove_compatible_function_property3_2) ).
cnf(prove_compatible_function_property3_3,negated_conjecture,
~ subclass(range_of(xh1),domain_of(xh2)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.9elbWJZAFT/E---3.1_24838.p',prove_compatible_function_property3_3) ).
cnf(prove_compatible_function_property3_1,negated_conjecture,
compatible(xh1,xf1,xf2),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.9elbWJZAFT/E---3.1_24838.p',prove_compatible_function_property3_1) ).
cnf(c_0_5,plain,
( domain_of(domain_of(X2)) = domain_of(X1)
| ~ compatible(X1,X2,X3) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[compatible2]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,plain,
( subclass(range_of(X1),domain_of(domain_of(X3)))
| ~ compatible(X1,X2,X3) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[compatible3]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,plain,
( domain_of(domain_of(X2)) = domain_of(X1)
| ~ compatible(X1,X2,X3) ),
c_0_5 ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
compatible(xh2,xf2,xf3),
prove_compatible_function_property3_2 ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
~ subclass(range_of(xh1),domain_of(xh2)),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[prove_compatible_function_property3_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
( subclass(range_of(X1),domain_of(domain_of(X3)))
| ~ compatible(X1,X2,X3) ),
c_0_6 ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
compatible(xh1,xf1,xf2),
prove_compatible_function_property3_1 ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
domain_of(domain_of(xf2)) = domain_of(xh2),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
~ subclass(range_of(xh1),domain_of(xh2)),
c_0_9 ).
cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]),c_0_12]),c_0_13]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.11 % Problem : SET563-6 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% 0.08/0.12 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.12/0.32 % Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.32 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.32 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.32 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.32 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.32 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.32 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.32 % DateTime : Fri May 3 10:27:13 EDT 2024
% 0.12/0.32 % CPUTime :
% 0.18/0.44 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.18/0.44 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.9elbWJZAFT/E---3.1_24838.p
% 0.18/0.46 # Version: 3.1.0
% 0.18/0.46 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.18/0.46 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.18/0.46 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.18/0.46 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.46 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.46 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.46 # new_bool_3 with pid 24917 completed with status 0
% 0.18/0.46 # Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.18/0.46 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.18/0.46 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.18/0.46 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.18/0.46 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.46 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.18/0.46 # Search class: FGHSM-FFMF31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.18/0.46 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.18/0.46 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04BN with 181s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.46 # G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04BN with pid 24920 completed with status 0
% 0.18/0.46 # Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04BN
% 0.18/0.46 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.18/0.46 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.18/0.46 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.18/0.46 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.46 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.18/0.46 # Search class: FGHSM-FFMF31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.18/0.46 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.18/0.46 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04BN with 181s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.46 # Preprocessing time : 0.003 s
% 0.18/0.46 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.18/0.46
% 0.18/0.46 # Proof found!
% 0.18/0.46 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.18/0.46 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.18/0.46 # Parsed axioms : 115
% 0.18/0.46 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 76
% 0.18/0.46 # Initial clauses : 39
% 0.18/0.46 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.18/0.46 # Initial clauses in saturation : 39
% 0.18/0.46 # Processed clauses : 86
% 0.18/0.46 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.18/0.46 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.18/0.46 # ...remaining for further processing : 86
% 0.18/0.46 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 2
% 0.18/0.46 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.18/0.46 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.18/0.46 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.18/0.46 # Generated clauses : 62
% 0.18/0.46 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 52
% 0.18/0.46 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.18/0.46 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.18/0.46 # Paramodulations : 60
% 0.18/0.46 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.18/0.46 # NegExts : 0
% 0.18/0.46 # Equation resolutions : 2
% 0.18/0.46 # Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.18/0.46 # Total rewrite steps : 2
% 0.18/0.46 # ...of those cached : 0
% 0.18/0.46 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.18/0.46 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.18/0.46 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.18/0.46 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.18/0.46 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.18/0.46 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.18/0.46 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.18/0.46 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.18/0.46 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.18/0.46 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.18/0.46 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.18/0.46 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.18/0.46 # Current number of processed clauses : 46
% 0.18/0.46 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 13
% 0.18/0.46 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.18/0.46 # Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.18/0.46 # Non-unit-clauses : 32
% 0.18/0.46 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 42
% 0.18/0.46 # ...number of literals in the above : 106
% 0.18/0.46 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.18/0.46 # Current number of archived clauses : 38
% 0.18/0.46 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 398
% 0.18/0.46 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 380
% 0.18/0.46 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.18/0.46 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 8
% 0.18/0.46 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.18/0.46 # BW rewrite match attempts : 2
% 0.18/0.46 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.18/0.46 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.18/0.46 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.18/0.46 # Termbank termtop insertions : 2641
% 0.18/0.46 # Search garbage collected termcells : 411
% 0.18/0.46
% 0.18/0.46 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.18/0.46 # User time : 0.008 s
% 0.18/0.46 # System time : 0.001 s
% 0.18/0.46 # Total time : 0.010 s
% 0.18/0.46 # Maximum resident set size: 1844 pages
% 0.18/0.46
% 0.18/0.46 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.18/0.46 # User time : 0.010 s
% 0.18/0.46 # System time : 0.004 s
% 0.18/0.46 # Total time : 0.014 s
% 0.18/0.46 # Maximum resident set size: 1792 pages
% 0.18/0.46 % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.18/0.46 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------