TSTP Solution File: SET411-6 by SNARK---20120808r022

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SNARK---20120808r022
% Problem  : SET411-6 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run-snark %s %d

% Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 05:09:31 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.37s 0.70s
% Output   : Refutation 0.37s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    3
%            Number of leaves      :    7
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   11 (   7 unt;   0 nHn;  10 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   16 (   1 equ;   8 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    5 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   10 (  10 usr;   6 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   12 (   4 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(subclass_members,axiom,
    ( ~ subclass(X,Y)
    | ~ member(Z,X)
    | member(Z,Y) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',subclass_members) ).

cnf(class_elements_are_sets,axiom,
    subclass(X,universal_class),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',class_elements_are_sets) ).

cnf(element_relation2,axiom,
    ( ~ member(ordered_pair(X,Y),element_relation)
    | member(X,Y) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',element_relation2) ).

cnf(intersection2,axiom,
    ( ~ member(X,intersection(Y,Z))
    | member(X,Z) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',intersection2) ).

cnf(compose_can_define_singleton,axiom,
    intersection(complement(compose(element_relation,complement(identity_relation))),element_relation) = singleton_relation,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-1.ax',compose_can_define_singleton) ).

cnf(prove_compose_condition_for_singleton_membership1_1,negated_conjecture,
    member(ordered_pair(x,y),singleton_relation),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_compose_condition_for_singleton_membership1_1) ).

cnf(prove_compose_condition_for_singleton_membership1_2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ member(x,universal_class),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_compose_condition_for_singleton_membership1_2) ).

cnf(157,plain,
    ~ member(x,X),
    inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[subclass_members,class_elements_are_sets,prove_compose_condition_for_singleton_membership1_2]) ).

cnf(208,plain,
    ( ~ member(X,singleton_relation)
    | member(X,element_relation) ),
    inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[intersection2,compose_can_define_singleton,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(306,plain,
    ~ member(ordered_pair(x,X),element_relation),
    inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[element_relation2,157]) ).

cnf(668,plain,
    $false,
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[208,prove_compose_condition_for_singleton_membership1_1]),306]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.09/0.14  % Problem  : SET411-6 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% 0.09/0.15  % Command  : run-snark %s %d
% 0.16/0.37  % Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% 0.16/0.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.16/0.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.16/0.37  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.16/0.37  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.16/0.37  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.16/0.37  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.16/0.37  % DateTime : Sat Jul  9 23:13:55 EDT 2022
% 0.16/0.37  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.24/0.51  /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.37/0.52  * 
% 0.37/0.52  * 
% 0.37/0.53  #<PACKAGE "SNARK-USER">
% 0.37/0.53  * 
% 0.37/0.53  SNARK-TPTP-OPTIONS
% 0.37/0.53  * 
% 0.37/0.53  ((AGENDA-LENGTH-LIMIT NIL) (AGENDA-LENGTH-BEFORE-SIMPLIFICATION-LIMIT NIL)
% 0.37/0.53   (USE-HYPERRESOLUTION T) (USE-UR-RESOLUTION T) (USE-PARAMODULATION T)
% 0.37/0.53   (USE-FACTORING :POS)
% 0.37/0.53   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-HYPERRESOLUTION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.37/0.53   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-PARAMODULATION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.37/0.53   (ORDERING-FUNCTIONS>CONSTANTS T) (ASSERT-CONTEXT :CURRENT)
% 0.37/0.53   (RUN-TIME-LIMIT 300) (LISTEN-FOR-COMMANDS NIL)
% 0.37/0.53   (USE-CLOSURE-WHEN-SATISFIABLE T) (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-GIVEN NIL)
% 0.37/0.53   (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-DERIVED NIL) (PRINT-UNORIENTABLE-ROWS NIL)
% 0.37/0.53   (PRINT-ROW-WFFS-PRETTILY NIL) (PRINT-FINAL-ROWS :TPTP)
% 0.37/0.53   (PRINT-OPTIONS-WHEN-STARTING NIL) (USE-VARIABLE-NAME-SORTS NIL)
% 0.37/0.53   (USE-PURITY-TEST T) (USE-RELEVANCE-TEST T) (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS1)
% 0.37/0.53   (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS2))
% 0.37/0.53  * 
% 0.37/0.53  "."
% 0.37/0.53  * 
% 0.37/0.53  ; Begin refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-07-09T23:13:55
% 0.37/0.53  ; Running SNARK from /davis/home/graph/tptp/Systems/SNARK---20120808r022/Source/snark-system.lisp in SBCL 1.0.12 on n023.cluster.edu at 2022-07-09T23:13:55
% 0.37/0.70  
% 0.37/0.70  
% 0.37/0.70  #||
% 0.37/0.70  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.37/0.70  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.37/0.70  ||#
% 0.37/0.70  
% 0.37/0.70  ; Summary of computation:
% 0.37/0.70  ;      1272 formulas have been input or derived (from 141 formulas).
% 0.37/0.70  ;       668 (53%) were retained.  Of these,
% 0.37/0.70  ;           21 ( 3%) were simplified or subsumed later,
% 0.37/0.70  ;          647 (97%) are still being kept.
% 0.37/0.70  ; 
% 0.37/0.70  ; Run time in seconds:
% 0.37/0.70  ;     0.021  12%   Read assertion file          (1 call)
% 0.37/0.70  ;     0.004   2%   Assert                       (114 calls)
% 0.37/0.70  ;     0.048  28%   Process new row              (1,169 calls)
% 0.37/0.70  ;     0.025  15%   Resolution                   (280 calls)
% 0.37/0.70  ;     0.003   2%   Paramodulation               (140 calls)
% 0.37/0.70  ;     0.000   0%   Factoring                    (3 calls)
% 0.37/0.70  ;     0.003   2%   Condensing                   (250 calls)
% 0.37/0.70  ;     0.012   7%   Forward subsumption          (250 calls)
% 0.37/0.70  ;     0.004   2%   Backward subsumption         (233 calls)
% 0.37/0.70  ;     0.000   0%   Clause clause subsumption    (138 calls)
% 0.37/0.70  ;     0.014   8%   Forward simplification       (1,169 calls)
% 0.37/0.70  ;     0.004   2%   Backward simplification      (653 calls)
% 0.37/0.70  ;     0.001   1%   Ordering                     (468 calls)
% 0.37/0.70  ;     0.001   1%   Sortal reasoning             (32 calls)
% 0.37/0.70  ;     0.000   0%   Purity testing               (1 call)
% 0.37/0.70  ;     0.032  19%   Other
% 0.37/0.70  ;     0.172        Total
% 0.37/0.70  ;     0.174        Real time
% 0.37/0.70  ; 
% 0.37/0.70  ; Term-hash-array has 1,494 terms in all.
% 0.37/0.70  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 233 entries (233 at peak, 233 added, 0 deleted).
% 0.37/0.70  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 1,542 nodes (1,542 at peak, 1,542 added, 0 deleted).
% 0.37/0.70  ;  Retrieved 137 possibly forward subsuming rows in 250 calls.
% 0.37/0.70  ;  Retrieved 41 possibly backward subsumed rows in 233 calls.
% 0.37/0.70  ; Path-index has 1,499 entries (1,499 at peak, 1,508 added, 9 deleted).
% 0.37/0.70  ; Path-index has 3,686 nodes (3,686 at peak, 3,693 added, 7 deleted).
% 0.37/0.70  ; Trie-index has 1,499 entries (1,499 at peak, 1,508 added, 9 deleted).
% 0.37/0.70  ; Trie-index has 4,853 nodes (4,853 at peak, 4,867 added, 14 deleted).
% 0.37/0.70  ; Retrieved 858 generalization terms in 2,822 calls.
% 0.37/0.70  ; Retrieved 448 instance terms in 419 calls.
% 0.37/0.70  ; Retrieved 25,526 unifiable terms in 1,742 calls.
% 0.37/0.70  ; 
% 0.37/0.70  ; The agenda of rows to process has 1 entry:
% 0.37/0.70  ;     1 with value 12
% 0.37/0.70  ; The agenda of rows to give has 507 entries:
% 0.37/0.70  ;    13 with value (4 9)           4 with value (4 22)           3 with value (4 34)
% 0.37/0.70  ;    29 with value (4 10)          7 with value (4 23)           2 with value (4 37)
% 0.37/0.70  ;    30 with value (4 11)          5 with value (4 24)           1 with value (4 43)
% 0.37/0.70  ;    37 with value (4 12)          2 with value (4 25)           1 with value (4 44)
% 0.37/0.70  ;    40 with value (4 13)          5 with value (4 26)           1 with value (4 45)
% 0.37/0.70  ;    76 with value (4 14)          1 with value (4 27)           4 with value (4 46)
% 0.37/0.70  ;    85 with value (4 15)          2 with value (4 28)           2 with value (4 49)
% 0.37/0.70  ;    73 with value (4 16)          3 with value (4 29)           1 with value (4 51)
% 0.37/0.70  ;    10 with value (4 17)          3 with value (4 30)           1 with value (4 53)
% 0.37/0.70  ;    23 with value (4 18)          1 with value (4 31)           1 with value (4 55)
% 0.37/0.70  ;    25 with value (4 19)          1 with value (4 32)           1 with value (4 59)
% 0.37/0.70  ;     4 with value (4 20)          2 with value (4 33)           1 with value (4 63)
% 0.37/0.70  ;     7 with value (4 21)
% 0.37/0.70  Evaluation took:
% 0.37/0.70    0.174 seconds of real time
% 0.37/0.70    0.158084 seconds of user run time
% 0.37/0.70    0.015823 seconds of system run time
% 0.37/0.70    0 calls to %EVAL
% 0.37/0.70    0 page faults and
% 0.37/0.70    10,897,440 bytes consed.
% 0.37/0.70  :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.37/0.70  ; End refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-07-09T23:13:55
% 0.37/0.70  :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.37/0.70  * 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------