TSTP Solution File: SET234-6 by E-SAT---3.1.00
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.1.00
% Problem : SET234-6 : TPTP v8.2.0. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 21 02:58:06 EDT 2024
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.21s 0.49s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.21s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 16 ( 7 unt; 3 nHn; 13 RR)
% Number of literals : 25 ( 4 equ; 9 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 5 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 8 ( 8 usr; 3 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 22 ( 6 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cartesian_product4,axiom,
( ordered_pair(first(X1),second(X1)) = X1
| ~ member(X1,cross_product(X2,X3)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',cartesian_product4) ).
cnf(not_subclass_members1,axiom,
( member(not_subclass_element(X1,X2),X1)
| subclass(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',not_subclass_members1) ).
cnf(prove_cross_product_property9_2,negated_conjecture,
~ subclass(cross_product(x,y),z),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_cross_product_property9_2) ).
cnf(not_subclass_members2,axiom,
( subclass(X1,X2)
| ~ member(not_subclass_element(X1,X2),X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',not_subclass_members2) ).
cnf(prove_cross_product_property9_1,negated_conjecture,
member(ordered_pair(first(not_subclass_element(cross_product(x,y),z)),second(not_subclass_element(cross_product(x,y),z))),z),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_cross_product_property9_1) ).
cnf(c_0_5,plain,
( ordered_pair(first(X1),second(X1)) = X1
| ~ member(X1,cross_product(X2,X3)) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cartesian_product4]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,plain,
( ordered_pair(first(X1),second(X1)) = X1
| ~ member(X1,cross_product(X2,X3)) ),
c_0_5 ).
cnf(c_0_7,axiom,
( member(not_subclass_element(X1,X2),X1)
| subclass(X1,X2) ),
not_subclass_members1 ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
~ subclass(cross_product(x,y),z),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[prove_cross_product_property9_2]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
( subclass(X1,X2)
| ~ member(not_subclass_element(X1,X2),X2) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[not_subclass_members2]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
member(ordered_pair(first(not_subclass_element(cross_product(x,y),z)),second(not_subclass_element(cross_product(x,y),z))),z),
prove_cross_product_property9_1 ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
( ordered_pair(first(not_subclass_element(cross_product(X1,X2),X3)),second(not_subclass_element(cross_product(X1,X2),X3))) = not_subclass_element(cross_product(X1,X2),X3)
| subclass(cross_product(X1,X2),X3) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
~ subclass(cross_product(x,y),z),
c_0_8 ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
( subclass(X1,X2)
| ~ member(not_subclass_element(X1,X2),X2) ),
c_0_9 ).
cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
member(not_subclass_element(cross_product(x,y),z),z),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]),c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]),c_0_12]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.12 % Problem : SET234-6 : TPTP v8.2.0. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% 0.04/0.13 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.15/0.34 % Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.15/0.35 % DateTime : Mon May 20 13:23:38 EDT 2024
% 0.15/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.21/0.47 Running first-order model finding
% 0.21/0.47 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.21/0.49 # Version: 3.1.0
% 0.21/0.49 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.21/0.49 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.49 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.49 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.49 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.49 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.49 # new_bool_3 with pid 22203 completed with status 0
% 0.21/0.49 # Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.21/0.49 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.21/0.49 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.49 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.49 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.49 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.21/0.49 # Search class: FGUSF-FFSF21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.21/0.49 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.21/0.49 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.49 # SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with pid 22206 completed with status 0
% 0.21/0.49 # Result found by SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG
% 0.21/0.49 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.21/0.49 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.49 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.49 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.49 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.21/0.49 # Search class: FGUSF-FFSF21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.21/0.49 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.21/0.49 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.49 # Preprocessing time : 0.002 s
% 0.21/0.49 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.21/0.49
% 0.21/0.49 # Proof found!
% 0.21/0.49 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.21/0.49 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.21/0.49 # Parsed axioms : 114
% 0.21/0.49 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 101
% 0.21/0.49 # Initial clauses : 13
% 0.21/0.49 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.21/0.49 # Initial clauses in saturation : 13
% 0.21/0.49 # Processed clauses : 40
% 0.21/0.49 # ...of these trivial : 1
% 0.21/0.49 # ...subsumed : 2
% 0.21/0.49 # ...remaining for further processing : 37
% 0.21/0.49 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 2
% 0.21/0.49 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.21/0.49 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.21/0.49 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.21/0.49 # Generated clauses : 53
% 0.21/0.49 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 44
% 0.21/0.49 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.21/0.49 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.21/0.49 # Paramodulations : 51
% 0.21/0.49 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.21/0.49 # NegExts : 0
% 0.21/0.49 # Equation resolutions : 2
% 0.21/0.49 # Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.21/0.49 # Total rewrite steps : 6
% 0.21/0.49 # ...of those cached : 2
% 0.21/0.49 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.21/0.49 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.21/0.49 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.21/0.49 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.21/0.49 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.21/0.49 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.21/0.49 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.49 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.49 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.49 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.49 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.49 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.49 # Current number of processed clauses : 23
% 0.21/0.49 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 6
% 0.21/0.49 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.21/0.49 # Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.21/0.49 # Non-unit-clauses : 16
% 0.21/0.49 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 24
% 0.21/0.49 # ...number of literals in the above : 66
% 0.21/0.49 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.21/0.49 # Current number of archived clauses : 12
% 0.21/0.49 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 37
% 0.21/0.49 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 35
% 0.21/0.49 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 2
% 0.21/0.49 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1
% 0.21/0.49 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.21/0.49 # BW rewrite match attempts : 4
% 0.21/0.49 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.21/0.49 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.21/0.49 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.21/0.49 # Termbank termtop insertions : 2226
% 0.21/0.49 # Search garbage collected termcells : 492
% 0.21/0.49
% 0.21/0.49 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.49 # User time : 0.006 s
% 0.21/0.49 # System time : 0.002 s
% 0.21/0.49 # Total time : 0.007 s
% 0.21/0.49 # Maximum resident set size: 1896 pages
% 0.21/0.49
% 0.21/0.49 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.49 # User time : 0.010 s
% 0.21/0.49 # System time : 0.003 s
% 0.21/0.49 # Total time : 0.013 s
% 0.21/0.49 # Maximum resident set size: 1804 pages
% 0.21/0.49 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------