TSTP Solution File: SET158-6 by iProver---3.9

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.9
% Problem  : SET158-6 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover %s %d THM

% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri May  3 03:00:07 EDT 2024

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 3.34s 1.14s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 3.34s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    3
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :    8 (   7 unt;   0 nHn;   8 RR)
%            Number of literals    :    9 (   1 equ;   3 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   3 con; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    2 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(c_49,negated_conjecture,
    member(y,x),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_corollary_to_complement_axiom_1) ).

cnf(c_50,negated_conjecture,
    member(z,complement(x)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_corollary_to_complement_axiom_2) ).

cnf(c_51,negated_conjecture,
    y = z,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_corollary_to_complement_axiom_3) ).

cnf(c_96,plain,
    ( ~ member(X0,complement(X1))
    | ~ member(X0,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',complement1) ).

cnf(c_1056,plain,
    member(y,complement(x)),
    inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_50,c_51]) ).

cnf(c_3042,negated_conjecture,
    member(y,x),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_49]) ).

cnf(c_4268,plain,
    ~ member(y,x),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1056,c_96]) ).

cnf(c_4269,plain,
    $false,
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_4268,c_3042]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.11  % Problem  : SET158-6 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% 0.03/0.11  % Command  : run_iprover %s %d THM
% 0.10/0.32  % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.32  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.32  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.32  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.10/0.32  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.10/0.32  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.32  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/0.32  % DateTime : Thu May  2 20:26:17 EDT 2024
% 0.10/0.32  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.17/0.43  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.17/0.43  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/run_problem --schedule fof_schedule --heuristic_context casc_unsat --no_cores 8 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 3.34/1.14  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 3.34/1.14  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 3.34/1.14  
% 3.34/1.14  %---------------- iProver v3.9 (pre CASC 2024/SMT-COMP 2024) ----------------%
% 3.34/1.14  
% 3.34/1.14  ------  iProver source info
% 3.34/1.14  
% 3.34/1.14  git: date: 2024-05-02 19:28:25 +0000
% 3.34/1.14  git: sha1: a33b5eb135c74074ba803943bb12f2ebd971352f
% 3.34/1.14  git: non_committed_changes: false
% 3.34/1.14  
% 3.34/1.14  ------ Parsing...successful
% 3.34/1.14  
% 3.34/1.14  
% 3.34/1.14  
% 3.34/1.14  ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 3  sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe:1:0s pe:2:0s pe:4:0s pe_e  sup_sim: 0  sf_s  rm: 3 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e 
% 3.34/1.14  
% 3.34/1.14  ------ Preprocessing... gs_s  sp: 0 0s  gs_e  snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e 
% 3.34/1.14  
% 3.34/1.14  ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e 
% 3.34/1.14  ------ Proving...
% 3.34/1.14  ------ Problem Properties 
% 3.34/1.14  
% 3.34/1.14  
% 3.34/1.14  clauses                                 103
% 3.34/1.14  conjectures                             2
% 3.34/1.14  EPR                                     14
% 3.34/1.14  Horn                                    95
% 3.34/1.14  unary                                   42
% 3.34/1.14  binary                                  40
% 3.34/1.14  lits                                    191
% 3.34/1.14  lits eq                                 45
% 3.34/1.14  fd_pure                                 0
% 3.34/1.14  fd_pseudo                               0
% 3.34/1.14  fd_cond                                 3
% 3.34/1.14  fd_pseudo_cond                          7
% 3.34/1.14  AC symbols                              0
% 3.34/1.14  
% 3.34/1.14  ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on 
% 3.34/1.14  
% 3.34/1.14  ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" Time Limit: 10.
% 3.34/1.14  
% 3.34/1.14  
% 3.34/1.14  ------ 
% 3.34/1.14  Current options:
% 3.34/1.14  ------ 
% 3.34/1.14  
% 3.34/1.14  
% 3.34/1.14  
% 3.34/1.14  
% 3.34/1.14  ------ Proving...
% 3.34/1.14  
% 3.34/1.14  
% 3.34/1.14  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 3.34/1.14  
% 3.34/1.14  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 3.34/1.14  
% 3.34/1.14  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------