TSTP Solution File: SET156-6 by E-SAT---3.1.00

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E-SAT---3.1.00
% Problem  : SET156-6 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sat May  4 09:22:25 EDT 2024

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 2.48s 0.73s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 2.48s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   10
%            Number of leaves      :    9
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   36 (  12 unt;   8 nHn;  21 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   69 (  11 equ;  32 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    5 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   59 (   3 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(subclass_members,axiom,
    ( member(X3,X2)
    | ~ subclass(X1,X2)
    | ~ member(X3,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.4NVDpHYtfd/E---3.1_24181.p',subclass_members) ).

cnf(class_elements_are_sets,axiom,
    subclass(X1,universal_class),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.4NVDpHYtfd/E---3.1_24181.p',class_elements_are_sets) ).

cnf(not_subclass_members2,axiom,
    ( subclass(X1,X2)
    | ~ member(not_subclass_element(X1,X2),X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.4NVDpHYtfd/E---3.1_24181.p',not_subclass_members2) ).

cnf(complement2,axiom,
    ( member(X1,complement(X2))
    | member(X1,X2)
    | ~ member(X1,universal_class) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.4NVDpHYtfd/E---3.1_24181.p',complement2) ).

cnf(not_subclass_members1,axiom,
    ( member(not_subclass_element(X1,X2),X1)
    | subclass(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.4NVDpHYtfd/E---3.1_24181.p',not_subclass_members1) ).

cnf(complement1,axiom,
    ( ~ member(X1,complement(X2))
    | ~ member(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.4NVDpHYtfd/E---3.1_24181.p',complement1) ).

cnf(subclass_implies_equal,axiom,
    ( X1 = X2
    | ~ subclass(X1,X2)
    | ~ subclass(X2,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.4NVDpHYtfd/E---3.1_24181.p',subclass_implies_equal) ).

cnf(prove_demorgans_law2_1,negated_conjecture,
    complement(intersection(x,y)) != union(complement(x),complement(y)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.4NVDpHYtfd/E---3.1_24181.p',prove_demorgans_law2_1) ).

cnf(union,axiom,
    complement(intersection(complement(X1),complement(X2))) = union(X1,X2),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.4NVDpHYtfd/E---3.1_24181.p',union) ).

cnf(c_0_9,plain,
    ( member(X3,X2)
    | ~ subclass(X1,X2)
    | ~ member(X3,X1) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[subclass_members]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,plain,
    ( member(X3,X2)
    | ~ subclass(X1,X2)
    | ~ member(X3,X1) ),
    c_0_9 ).

cnf(c_0_11,axiom,
    subclass(X1,universal_class),
    class_elements_are_sets ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    ( subclass(X1,X2)
    | ~ member(not_subclass_element(X1,X2),X2) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[not_subclass_members2]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    ( member(X1,complement(X2))
    | member(X1,X2)
    | ~ member(X1,universal_class) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[complement2]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    ( member(X1,universal_class)
    | ~ member(X1,X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,axiom,
    ( member(not_subclass_element(X1,X2),X1)
    | subclass(X1,X2) ),
    not_subclass_members1 ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    ( ~ member(X1,complement(X2))
    | ~ member(X1,X2) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[complement1]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    ( subclass(X1,X2)
    | ~ member(not_subclass_element(X1,X2),X2) ),
    c_0_12 ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    ( member(X1,complement(X2))
    | member(X1,X2)
    | ~ member(X1,universal_class) ),
    c_0_13 ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    ( member(not_subclass_element(X1,X2),universal_class)
    | subclass(X1,X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    ( ~ member(X1,complement(X2))
    | ~ member(X1,X2) ),
    c_0_16 ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    ( member(not_subclass_element(X1,complement(X2)),X2)
    | subclass(X1,complement(X2)) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]),c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    ( X1 = X2
    | ~ subclass(X1,X2)
    | ~ subclass(X2,X1) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[subclass_implies_equal]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    ( subclass(X1,complement(complement(X2)))
    | ~ member(not_subclass_element(X1,complement(complement(X2))),X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,plain,
    ( subclass(complement(X1),X2)
    | ~ member(not_subclass_element(complement(X1),X2),X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
    complement(intersection(x,y)) != union(complement(x),complement(y)),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[prove_demorgans_law2_1]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,plain,
    ( X1 = X2
    | ~ subclass(X1,X2)
    | ~ subclass(X2,X1) ),
    c_0_22 ).

cnf(c_0_27,plain,
    subclass(X1,complement(complement(X1))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,plain,
    ( member(not_subclass_element(complement(complement(X1)),X2),X1)
    | subclass(complement(complement(X1)),X2) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_18]),c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,negated_conjecture,
    complement(intersection(x,y)) != union(complement(x),complement(y)),
    c_0_25 ).

cnf(c_0_30,axiom,
    complement(intersection(complement(X1),complement(X2))) = union(X1,X2),
    union ).

cnf(c_0_31,plain,
    ( complement(complement(X1)) = X1
    | ~ subclass(complement(complement(X1)),X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_27]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,plain,
    subclass(complement(complement(X1)),X1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_28]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,negated_conjecture,
    complement(intersection(x,y)) != complement(intersection(complement(complement(x)),complement(complement(y)))),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_30]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,plain,
    complement(complement(X1)) = X1,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_32])]) ).

cnf(c_0_35,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_33,c_0_34]),c_0_34])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.05/0.10  % Problem    : SET156-6 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% 0.05/0.11  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.10/0.31  % Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.31  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.31  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.31  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.10/0.31  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.10/0.31  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.10/0.31  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.10/0.31  % DateTime   : Fri May  3 10:23:55 EDT 2024
% 0.10/0.31  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.15/0.42  Running first-order model finding
% 0.15/0.42  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.4NVDpHYtfd/E---3.1_24181.p
% 2.48/0.73  # Version: 3.1.0
% 2.48/0.73  # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 2.48/0.73  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 2.48/0.73  # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 2.48/0.73  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 2.48/0.73  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 2.48/0.73  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 2.48/0.73  # C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with pid 24258 completed with status 0
% 2.48/0.73  # Result found by C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr
% 2.48/0.73  # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 2.48/0.73  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 2.48/0.73  # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 2.48/0.73  # No SInE strategy applied
% 2.48/0.73  # Search class: FGHSM-FFLM31-DFFFFFNN
% 2.48/0.73  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 2.48/0.73  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 313s (1) cores
% 2.48/0.73  # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 151s (1) cores
% 2.48/0.73  # Starting new_bool_1 with 308s (1) cores
% 2.48/0.73  # Starting sh5l with 304s (1) cores
% 2.48/0.73  # Starting G-E--_208_C18C--_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 136s (1) cores
% 2.48/0.73  # C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with pid 24266 completed with status 0
% 2.48/0.73  # Result found by C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr
% 2.48/0.73  # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 2.48/0.73  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 2.48/0.73  # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 2.48/0.73  # No SInE strategy applied
% 2.48/0.73  # Search class: FGHSM-FFLM31-DFFFFFNN
% 2.48/0.73  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 2.48/0.73  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 313s (1) cores
% 2.48/0.73  # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 151s (1) cores
% 2.48/0.73  # Preprocessing time       : 0.003 s
% 2.48/0.73  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 2.48/0.73  
% 2.48/0.73  # Proof found!
% 2.48/0.73  # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 2.48/0.73  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 2.48/0.73  # Parsed axioms                        : 113
% 2.48/0.73  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 2.48/0.73  # Initial clauses                      : 113
% 2.48/0.73  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 17
% 2.48/0.73  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 96
% 2.48/0.73  # Processed clauses                    : 2629
% 2.48/0.73  # ...of these trivial                  : 68
% 2.48/0.73  # ...subsumed                          : 1619
% 2.48/0.73  # ...remaining for further processing  : 942
% 2.48/0.73  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 14
% 2.48/0.73  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 2.48/0.73  # Backward-subsumed                    : 23
% 2.48/0.73  # Backward-rewritten                   : 362
% 2.48/0.73  # Generated clauses                    : 8714
% 2.48/0.73  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 8006
% 2.48/0.73  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 2.48/0.73  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 14
% 2.48/0.73  # Paramodulations                      : 8690
% 2.48/0.73  # Factorizations                       : 10
% 2.48/0.73  # NegExts                              : 0
% 2.48/0.73  # Equation resolutions                 : 14
% 2.48/0.73  # Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 2.48/0.73  # Total rewrite steps                  : 3724
% 2.48/0.73  # ...of those cached                   : 3272
% 2.48/0.73  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 2.48/0.73  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 2.48/0.73  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 2.48/0.73  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 2.48/0.73  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 2.48/0.73  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 2.48/0.73  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 2.48/0.73  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 2.48/0.73  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 2.48/0.73  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 2.48/0.73  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 2.48/0.73  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 2.48/0.73  # Current number of processed clauses  : 458
% 2.48/0.73  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 72
% 2.48/0.73  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 1
% 2.48/0.73  #    Negative unit clauses             : 10
% 2.48/0.73  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 375
% 2.48/0.73  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 5184
% 2.48/0.73  # ...number of literals in the above   : 17461
% 2.48/0.73  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 2.48/0.73  # Current number of archived clauses   : 497
% 2.48/0.73  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 64381
% 2.48/0.73  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 37611
% 2.48/0.73  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 1228
% 2.48/0.73  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2998
% 2.48/0.73  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 2.48/0.73  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 235
% 2.48/0.73  # BW rewrite match successes           : 126
% 2.48/0.73  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 2.48/0.73  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 2.48/0.73  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 411688
% 2.48/0.73  # Search garbage collected termcells   : 185
% 2.48/0.73  
% 2.48/0.73  # -------------------------------------------------
% 2.48/0.73  # User time                : 0.293 s
% 2.48/0.73  # System time              : 0.006 s
% 2.48/0.73  # Total time               : 0.299 s
% 2.48/0.73  # Maximum resident set size: 2020 pages
% 2.48/0.73  
% 2.48/0.73  # -------------------------------------------------
% 2.48/0.73  # User time                : 1.435 s
% 2.48/0.73  # System time              : 0.028 s
% 2.48/0.73  # Total time               : 1.463 s
% 2.48/0.73  # Maximum resident set size: 1788 pages
% 2.48/0.73  % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------