TSTP Solution File: SET153-6 by iProver---3.9
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : iProver---3.9
% Problem : SET153-6 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_iprover %s %d THM
% Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri May 3 03:00:06 EDT 2024
% Result : Unsatisfiable 3.90s 1.24s
% Output : CNFRefutation 3.90s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (Could not find formula named definition)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(c_49,negated_conjecture,
intersection(complement(x),x) != null_class,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_intersection_with_complement_1) ).
cnf(c_91,plain,
( ~ member(X0,intersection(X1,X2))
| member(X0,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',intersection1) ).
cnf(c_92,plain,
( ~ member(X0,intersection(X1,X2))
| member(X0,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',intersection2) ).
cnf(c_94,plain,
( ~ member(X0,complement(X1))
| ~ member(X0,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',complement1) ).
cnf(c_136,plain,
( X0 = null_class
| member(regular(X0),X0) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',regularity1) ).
cnf(c_3029,plain,
complement(x) = sP0_iProver_def,
definition ).
cnf(c_3030,plain,
intersection(sP0_iProver_def,x) = sP1_iProver_def,
definition ).
cnf(c_3031,negated_conjecture,
sP1_iProver_def != null_class,
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_49,c_3029,c_3030]) ).
cnf(c_4197,plain,
( ~ member(X0,sP1_iProver_def)
| member(X0,sP0_iProver_def) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_3030,c_91]) ).
cnf(c_4246,plain,
( ~ member(X0,sP1_iProver_def)
| member(X0,x) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_3030,c_92]) ).
cnf(c_4270,plain,
( ~ member(X0,x)
| ~ member(X0,sP0_iProver_def) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_3029,c_94]) ).
cnf(c_4291,plain,
~ member(X0,sP1_iProver_def),
inference(global_subsumption_just,[status(thm)],[c_4246,c_4197,c_4246,c_4270]) ).
cnf(c_4295,plain,
null_class = sP1_iProver_def,
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_136,c_4291]) ).
cnf(c_4298,plain,
sP1_iProver_def != sP1_iProver_def,
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_3031,c_4295]) ).
cnf(c_4299,plain,
$false,
inference(equality_resolution_simp,[status(thm)],[c_4298]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.13 % Problem : SET153-6 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% 0.04/0.14 % Command : run_iprover %s %d THM
% 0.14/0.35 % Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % DateTime : Thu May 2 20:07:05 EDT 2024
% 0.14/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.49 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.20/0.49 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/run_problem --schedule fof_schedule --heuristic_context casc_unsat --no_cores 8 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 3.90/1.24 % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 3.90/1.24 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 3.90/1.24
% 3.90/1.24 %---------------- iProver v3.9 (pre CASC 2024/SMT-COMP 2024) ----------------%
% 3.90/1.24
% 3.90/1.24 ------ iProver source info
% 3.90/1.24
% 3.90/1.24 git: date: 2024-05-02 19:28:25 +0000
% 3.90/1.24 git: sha1: a33b5eb135c74074ba803943bb12f2ebd971352f
% 3.90/1.24 git: non_committed_changes: false
% 3.90/1.24
% 3.90/1.24 ------ Parsing...successful
% 3.90/1.24
% 3.90/1.24
% 3.90/1.24
% 3.90/1.24 ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 2 sf_s rm: 1 0s sf_e pe_s pe:1:0s pe:2:0s pe:4:0s pe_e sup_sim: 0 sf_s rm: 3 0s sf_e pe_s pe_e
% 3.90/1.24
% 3.90/1.24 ------ Preprocessing... gs_s sp: 0 0s gs_e snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e
% 3.90/1.24
% 3.90/1.24 ------ Preprocessing... sf_s rm: 1 0s sf_e sf_s rm: 0 0s sf_e
% 3.90/1.24 ------ Proving...
% 3.90/1.24 ------ Problem Properties
% 3.90/1.24
% 3.90/1.24
% 3.90/1.24 clauses 103
% 3.90/1.24 conjectures 1
% 3.90/1.24 EPR 13
% 3.90/1.24 Horn 95
% 3.90/1.24 unary 42
% 3.90/1.24 binary 40
% 3.90/1.24 lits 191
% 3.90/1.24 lits eq 47
% 3.90/1.24 fd_pure 0
% 3.90/1.24 fd_pseudo 0
% 3.90/1.24 fd_cond 3
% 3.90/1.24 fd_pseudo_cond 7
% 3.90/1.24 AC symbols 0
% 3.90/1.24
% 3.90/1.24 ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on
% 3.90/1.24
% 3.90/1.24 ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" Time Limit: 10.
% 3.90/1.24
% 3.90/1.24
% 3.90/1.24 ------
% 3.90/1.24 Current options:
% 3.90/1.24 ------
% 3.90/1.24
% 3.90/1.24
% 3.90/1.24
% 3.90/1.24
% 3.90/1.24 ------ Proving...
% 3.90/1.24
% 3.90/1.24
% 3.90/1.24 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 3.90/1.24
% 3.90/1.24 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 3.90/1.24
% 3.90/1.24
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------