TSTP Solution File: SET153-6 by E-SAT---3.1.00
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.1.00
% Problem : SET153-6 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sat May 4 09:22:24 EDT 2024
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.19s 0.52s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.19s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 19 ( 5 unt; 4 nHn; 14 RR)
% Number of literals : 33 ( 9 equ; 16 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 2 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 33 ( 6 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(intersection1,axiom,
( member(X1,X2)
| ~ member(X1,intersection(X2,X3)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.A31jGFsw0s/E---3.1_25863.p',intersection1) ).
cnf(complement1,axiom,
( ~ member(X1,complement(X2))
| ~ member(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.A31jGFsw0s/E---3.1_25863.p',complement1) ).
cnf(regularity1,axiom,
( X1 = null_class
| member(regular(X1),X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.A31jGFsw0s/E---3.1_25863.p',regularity1) ).
cnf(intersection2,axiom,
( member(X1,X3)
| ~ member(X1,intersection(X2,X3)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.A31jGFsw0s/E---3.1_25863.p',intersection2) ).
cnf(prove_intersection_with_complement_1,negated_conjecture,
intersection(complement(x),x) != null_class,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.A31jGFsw0s/E---3.1_25863.p',prove_intersection_with_complement_1) ).
cnf(c_0_5,plain,
( member(X1,X2)
| ~ member(X1,intersection(X2,X3)) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[intersection1]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,plain,
( ~ member(X1,complement(X2))
| ~ member(X1,X2) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[complement1]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,plain,
( member(X1,X2)
| ~ member(X1,intersection(X2,X3)) ),
c_0_5 ).
cnf(c_0_8,axiom,
( X1 = null_class
| member(regular(X1),X1) ),
regularity1 ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
( member(X1,X3)
| ~ member(X1,intersection(X2,X3)) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[intersection2]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
( ~ member(X1,complement(X2))
| ~ member(X1,X2) ),
c_0_6 ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
( intersection(X1,X2) = null_class
| member(regular(intersection(X1,X2)),X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
( member(X1,X3)
| ~ member(X1,intersection(X2,X3)) ),
c_0_9 ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
intersection(complement(x),x) != null_class,
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[prove_intersection_with_complement_1]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
( intersection(complement(X1),X2) = null_class
| ~ member(regular(intersection(complement(X1),X2)),X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
( intersection(X1,X2) = null_class
| member(regular(intersection(X1,X2)),X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
intersection(complement(x),x) != null_class,
c_0_13 ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
intersection(complement(X1),X1) = null_class,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.11 % Problem : SET153-6 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% 0.11/0.13 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.13/0.33 % Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Fri May 3 10:01:34 EDT 2024
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.47 Running first-order model finding
% 0.19/0.47 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.A31jGFsw0s/E---3.1_25863.p
% 0.19/0.52 # Version: 3.1.0
% 0.19/0.52 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.19/0.52 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.19/0.52 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.19/0.52 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.52 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.52 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.52 # sh5l with pid 25943 completed with status 0
% 0.19/0.52 # Result found by sh5l
% 0.19/0.52 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.19/0.52 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.19/0.52 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.19/0.52 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.52 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.52 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.52 # SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.19/0.52 # Search class: FGHSM-FFMM31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.19/0.52 # Scheduled 13 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.19/0.52 # Starting G-E--_107_C41_F1_PI_AE_CS_SP_PS_S4S with 23s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.52 # G-E--_107_C41_F1_PI_AE_CS_SP_PS_S4S with pid 25946 completed with status 0
% 0.19/0.52 # Result found by G-E--_107_C41_F1_PI_AE_CS_SP_PS_S4S
% 0.19/0.52 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.19/0.52 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.19/0.52 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.19/0.52 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.52 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.52 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.52 # SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.19/0.52 # Search class: FGHSM-FFMM31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.19/0.52 # Scheduled 13 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.19/0.52 # Starting G-E--_107_C41_F1_PI_AE_CS_SP_PS_S4S with 23s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.52 # Preprocessing time : 0.003 s
% 0.19/0.52 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.19/0.52
% 0.19/0.52 # Proof found!
% 0.19/0.52 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.19/0.52 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.19/0.52 # Parsed axioms : 113
% 0.19/0.52 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 14
% 0.19/0.52 # Initial clauses : 99
% 0.19/0.52 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.19/0.52 # Initial clauses in saturation : 99
% 0.19/0.52 # Processed clauses : 390
% 0.19/0.52 # ...of these trivial : 9
% 0.19/0.52 # ...subsumed : 57
% 0.19/0.52 # ...remaining for further processing : 324
% 0.19/0.52 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 2
% 0.19/0.52 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.19/0.52 # Backward-subsumed : 2
% 0.19/0.52 # Backward-rewritten : 9
% 0.19/0.52 # Generated clauses : 1162
% 0.19/0.52 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 972
% 0.19/0.52 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.19/0.52 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 1
% 0.19/0.52 # Paramodulations : 1158
% 0.19/0.52 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.19/0.52 # NegExts : 0
% 0.19/0.52 # Equation resolutions : 4
% 0.19/0.52 # Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.19/0.52 # Total rewrite steps : 320
% 0.19/0.52 # ...of those cached : 194
% 0.19/0.52 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.19/0.52 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.19/0.52 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.19/0.52 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.19/0.52 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.19/0.52 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.19/0.52 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.19/0.52 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.19/0.52 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.19/0.52 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.19/0.52 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.19/0.52 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.19/0.52 # Current number of processed clauses : 213
% 0.19/0.52 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 91
% 0.19/0.52 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 3
% 0.19/0.52 # Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.19/0.52 # Non-unit-clauses : 118
% 0.19/0.52 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 775
% 0.19/0.52 # ...number of literals in the above : 1560
% 0.19/0.52 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.19/0.52 # Current number of archived clauses : 109
% 0.19/0.52 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 3221
% 0.19/0.52 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2809
% 0.19/0.52 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 29
% 0.19/0.52 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1011
% 0.19/0.52 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 18
% 0.19/0.52 # BW rewrite match attempts : 69
% 0.19/0.52 # BW rewrite match successes : 16
% 0.19/0.52 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.19/0.52 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.19/0.52 # Termbank termtop insertions : 18344
% 0.19/0.52 # Search garbage collected termcells : 229
% 0.19/0.52
% 0.19/0.52 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.52 # User time : 0.034 s
% 0.19/0.52 # System time : 0.004 s
% 0.19/0.52 # Total time : 0.038 s
% 0.19/0.52 # Maximum resident set size: 1892 pages
% 0.19/0.52
% 0.19/0.52 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.52 # User time : 0.038 s
% 0.19/0.52 # System time : 0.005 s
% 0.19/0.52 # Total time : 0.043 s
% 0.19/0.52 # Maximum resident set size: 1788 pages
% 0.19/0.52 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------