TSTP Solution File: SET102-7 by SnakeForV-SAT---1.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SnakeForV-SAT---1.0
% Problem  : SET102-7 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_sat --cores 0 -t %d %s

% Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 31 18:23:43 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.21s 0.53s
% Output   : Refutation 0.21s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    5
%            Number of leaves      :   10
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   18 (  16 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   20 (   9 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :    8 (   6   ~;   2   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   10 (  10 usr;   7 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   11 (  11   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f332,plain,
    $false,
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f331,f255]) ).

fof(f255,plain,
    member(sF1,universal_class),
    inference(superposition,[],[f11,f235]) ).

fof(f235,plain,
    sF1 = unordered_pair(x,sF0),
    introduced(function_definition,[]) ).

fof(f11,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] : member(unordered_pair(X0,X1),universal_class),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',unordered_pairs_in_universal) ).

fof(f331,plain,
    ~ member(sF1,universal_class),
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f319,f238]) ).

fof(f238,plain,
    ~ member(sF1,sF3),
    inference(definition_folding,[],[f159,f237,f235,f234,f236,f235,f234]) ).

fof(f236,plain,
    sF2 = unordered_pair(x,x),
    introduced(function_definition,[]) ).

fof(f234,plain,
    sF0 = unordered_pair(y,y),
    introduced(function_definition,[]) ).

fof(f237,plain,
    sF3 = unordered_pair(sF2,sF1),
    introduced(function_definition,[]) ).

fof(f159,plain,
    ~ member(unordered_pair(x,unordered_pair(y,y)),unordered_pair(unordered_pair(x,x),unordered_pair(x,unordered_pair(y,y)))),
    inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f146,f12,f151]) ).

fof(f151,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] : ordered_pair(X0,X1) = unordered_pair(unordered_pair(X0,X0),unordered_pair(X0,unordered_pair(X1,X1))),
    inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f13,f12,f12]) ).

fof(f13,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] : unordered_pair(singleton(X0),unordered_pair(X0,singleton(X1))) = ordered_pair(X0,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ordered_pair) ).

fof(f12,axiom,
    ! [X0] : unordered_pair(X0,X0) = singleton(X0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',singleton_set) ).

fof(f146,axiom,
    ~ member(unordered_pair(x,singleton(y)),ordered_pair(x,y)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_unordered_pair_member_of_ordered_pair_1) ).

fof(f319,plain,
    ( member(sF1,sF3)
    | ~ member(sF1,universal_class) ),
    inference(superposition,[],[f9,f269]) ).

fof(f269,plain,
    unordered_pair(sF1,sF2) = sF3,
    inference(superposition,[],[f108,f237]) ).

fof(f108,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] : unordered_pair(X0,X1) = unordered_pair(X1,X0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',commutativity_of_unordered_pair) ).

fof(f9,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( member(X0,unordered_pair(X0,X1))
      | ~ member(X0,universal_class) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',unordered_pair2) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13  % Problem    : SET102-7 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% 0.07/0.14  % Command    : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_sat --cores 0 -t %d %s
% 0.14/0.35  % Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % DateTime   : Tue Aug 30 13:49:44 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.35  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.21/0.48  % (29259)ott+4_1:1_av=off:bd=off:nwc=5.0:rp=on:s2a=on:s2at=2.0:slsq=on:slsqc=2:slsql=off:slsqr=1,2:sp=frequency:i=100:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/100Mi)
% 0.21/0.49  % (29253)ott+10_1:5_bd=off:tgt=full:i=99:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/99Mi)
% 0.21/0.50  % (29265)ott+10_1:5_bd=off:tgt=full:i=500:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/500Mi)
% 0.21/0.51  % (29253)First to succeed.
% 0.21/0.52  % (29245)dis+34_1:32_abs=on:add=off:bsr=on:gsp=on:sp=weighted_frequency:i=48:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/48Mi)
% 0.21/0.52  % (29247)dis+10_1:1_fsd=on:sp=occurrence:i=7:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/7Mi)
% 0.21/0.53  % (29253)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.21/0.53  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 0.21/0.53  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.21/0.53  % (29253)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.53  % (29253)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 807e37dd9 on 2022-08-23 09:55:27 +0200)
% 0.21/0.53  % (29253)Linked with Z3 4.8.13.0 f03d756e086f81f2596157241e0decfb1c982299 z3-4.8.4-5390-gf03d756e0
% 0.21/0.53  % (29253)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.21/0.53  
% 0.21/0.53  % (29253)Memory used [KB]: 5756
% 0.21/0.53  % (29253)Time elapsed: 0.104 s
% 0.21/0.53  % (29253)Instructions burned: 16 (million)
% 0.21/0.53  % (29253)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.53  % (29253)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.53  % (29239)Success in time 0.163 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------