TSTP Solution File: SET102-7 by SOS---2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SOS---2.0
% Problem  : SET102-7 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : sos-script %s

% Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 05:15:49 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.74s 0.97s
% Output   : Refutation 0.74s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12  % Problem  : SET102-7 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% 0.06/0.12  % Command  : sos-script %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Sun Jul 10 12:28:07 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.12/0.36  ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.12/0.36  The process was started by sandbox on n009.cluster.edu,
% 0.12/0.36  Sun Jul 10 12:28:07 2022
% 0.12/0.36  The command was "./sos".  The process ID is 20226.
% 0.12/0.36  
% 0.12/0.36  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.12/0.36  set(auto).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.12/0.36  clear(print_given).
% 0.12/0.36  
% 0.12/0.36  list(usable).
% 0.12/0.36  
% 0.12/0.36  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=5.
% 0.12/0.36  
% 0.12/0.36  This ia a non-Horn set with equality.  The strategy will be
% 0.12/0.36  Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, ur_res, factoring, and
% 0.12/0.36  unit deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 0.12/0.36  clauses in usable.
% 0.12/0.36  
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: set(factor).
% 0.12/0.36  
% 0.12/0.36  ------------> process usable:
% 0.12/0.36  
% 0.12/0.36  ------------> process sos:
% 0.12/0.36    Following clause subsumed by 105 during input processing: 0 [demod,108] {-} member(unordered_pair(A,A),universal_class).
% 0.12/0.36    Following clause subsumed by 174 during input processing: 0 [copy,174,flip.1] {-} unordered_pair(A,B)=unordered_pair(B,A).
% 0.12/0.36    Following clause subsumed by 203 during input processing: 0 [copy,203,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.12/0.36  203 back subsumes 100.
% 0.12/0.36  203 back subsumes 92.
% 0.12/0.36    Following clause subsumed by 201 during input processing: 0 [copy,234,flip.1] {-} unordered_pair(A,B)=union(unordered_pair(A,A),unordered_pair(B,B)).
% 0.12/0.36  
% 0.12/0.36  ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.74/0.97  
% 0.74/0.97  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.74/0.97  
% 0.74/0.97  
% 0.74/0.97  Failed to model usable list: disabling FINDER
% 0.74/0.97  
% 0.74/0.97  
% 0.74/0.97  
% 0.74/0.97  -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.74/0.97  
% 0.74/0.97  UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.74/0.97  SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.74/0.97  SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.74/0.97  number of clauses in intial UL: 66
% 0.74/0.97  number of clauses initially in problem: 171
% 0.74/0.97  percentage of clauses intially in UL: 38
% 0.74/0.97  percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 57
% 0.74/0.97  percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.74/0.97  absolute distinct symbol count: 52
% 0.74/0.97     distinct predicate count: 10
% 0.74/0.97     distinct function count: 32
% 0.74/0.97     distinct constant count: 10
% 0.74/0.97  
% 0.74/0.97  ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.74/0.97  
% 0.74/0.97  
% 0.74/0.97  
% 0.74/0.97  =========== start of search ===========
% 0.74/0.97  
% 0.74/0.97  -------- PROOF -------- 
% 0.74/0.97  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.74/0.97  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.74/0.97  
% 0.74/0.97  ----> UNIT CONFLICT at   0.59 sec ----> 497 [binary,496.1,205.1] {-} $F.
% 0.74/0.97  
% 0.74/0.97  Length of proof is 4.  Level of proof is 3.
% 0.74/0.97  
% 0.74/0.97  ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 0.74/0.97  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.74/0.97  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.74/0.97  
% 0.74/0.97  8 [] {+} -member(A,universal_class)|member(A,unordered_pair(B,A)).
% 0.74/0.97  91 [] {-} -member(unordered_pair(x,singleton(y)),ordered_pair(x,y)).
% 0.74/0.97  105 [] {-} member(unordered_pair(A,B),universal_class).
% 0.74/0.97  106 [] {-} unordered_pair(A,A)=singleton(A).
% 0.74/0.97  108,107 [copy,106,flip.1] {-} singleton(A)=unordered_pair(A,A).
% 0.74/0.97  109 [] {-} unordered_pair(singleton(A),unordered_pair(A,singleton(B)))=ordered_pair(A,B).
% 0.74/0.97  110 [copy,109,demod,108,108] {-} unordered_pair(unordered_pair(A,A),unordered_pair(A,unordered_pair(B,B)))=ordered_pair(A,B).
% 0.74/0.97  205 [back_demod,91,demod,108] {-} -member(unordered_pair(x,unordered_pair(y,y)),ordered_pair(x,y)).
% 0.74/0.97  496 [para_from,110.1.1,8.2.2,unit_del,105] {-} member(unordered_pair(A,unordered_pair(B,B)),ordered_pair(A,B)).
% 0.74/0.97  497 [binary,496.1,205.1] {-} $F.
% 0.74/0.97  
% 0.74/0.97  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.74/0.97  ------------ end of proof -------------
% 0.74/0.97  
% 0.74/0.97  
% 0.74/0.97  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 0.74/0.97  
% 0.74/0.97  
% 0.74/0.97  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 0.74/0.97  
% 0.74/0.97  ============ end of search ============
% 0.74/0.97  
% 0.74/0.97  That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 0.74/0.97  
% 0.74/0.97  Process 20226 finished Sun Jul 10 12:28:07 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------