TSTP Solution File: SET095+1 by ET---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : ET---2.0
% Problem : SET095+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v5.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_ET %s %d
% Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 00:49:04 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.23s 1.40s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.23s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 20 ( 7 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 52 ( 14 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 11 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 48 ( 16 ~; 20 |; 7 &)
% ( 2 <=>; 3 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 13 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 6 ( 6 usr; 3 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 38 ( 5 sgn 23 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(unordered_pair_defn,axiom,
! [X3,X1,X2] :
( member(X3,unordered_pair(X1,X2))
<=> ( member(X3,universal_class)
& ( X3 = X1
| X3 = X2 ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET005+0.ax',unordered_pair_defn) ).
fof(subclass_defn,axiom,
! [X1,X2] :
( subclass(X1,X2)
<=> ! [X3] :
( member(X3,X1)
=> member(X3,X2) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET005+0.ax',subclass_defn) ).
fof(property_of_singletons2,conjecture,
! [X1,X2] :
( member(X1,X2)
=> subclass(singleton(X1),X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',property_of_singletons2) ).
fof(singleton_set_defn,axiom,
! [X1] : singleton(X1) = unordered_pair(X1,X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET005+0.ax',singleton_set_defn) ).
fof(c_0_4,plain,
! [X4,X5,X6,X4,X5,X6] :
( ( member(X4,universal_class)
| ~ member(X4,unordered_pair(X5,X6)) )
& ( X4 = X5
| X4 = X6
| ~ member(X4,unordered_pair(X5,X6)) )
& ( X4 != X5
| ~ member(X4,universal_class)
| member(X4,unordered_pair(X5,X6)) )
& ( X4 != X6
| ~ member(X4,universal_class)
| member(X4,unordered_pair(X5,X6)) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[unordered_pair_defn])])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_5,plain,
! [X4,X5,X6,X4,X5] :
( ( ~ subclass(X4,X5)
| ~ member(X6,X4)
| member(X6,X5) )
& ( member(esk1_2(X4,X5),X4)
| subclass(X4,X5) )
& ( ~ member(esk1_2(X4,X5),X5)
| subclass(X4,X5) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[subclass_defn])])])])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X1,X2] :
( member(X1,X2)
=> subclass(singleton(X1),X2) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[property_of_singletons2]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,plain,
( X1 = X3
| X1 = X2
| ~ member(X1,unordered_pair(X2,X3)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
( subclass(X1,X2)
| member(esk1_2(X1,X2),X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
fof(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
( member(esk8_0,esk9_0)
& ~ subclass(singleton(esk8_0),esk9_0) ),
inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])])]) ).
fof(c_0_10,plain,
! [X2] : singleton(X2) = unordered_pair(X2,X2),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[singleton_set_defn]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
( esk1_2(unordered_pair(X1,X2),X3) = X2
| esk1_2(unordered_pair(X1,X2),X3) = X1
| subclass(unordered_pair(X1,X2),X3) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
~ subclass(singleton(esk8_0),esk9_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
singleton(X1) = unordered_pair(X1,X1),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
( subclass(X1,X2)
| ~ member(esk1_2(X1,X2),X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
( esk1_2(unordered_pair(X1,X1),X2) = X1
| subclass(unordered_pair(X1,X1),X2) ),
inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(ef,[status(thm)],[c_0_11])]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
~ subclass(unordered_pair(esk8_0,esk8_0),esk9_0),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
( subclass(unordered_pair(X1,X1),X2)
| ~ member(X1,X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
member(esk8_0,esk9_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]),c_0_18])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.11 % Problem : SET095+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v5.4.0.
% 0.06/0.12 % Command : run_ET %s %d
% 0.13/0.33 % Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.33 % DateTime : Sun Jul 10 13:26:23 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.23/1.40 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_4a02c828a8cc55752123edbcc1ad40e453c11447 for 23 seconds:
% 0.23/1.40 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.4,,04,100,1.0)
% 0.23/1.40 # Preprocessing time : 0.015 s
% 0.23/1.40
% 0.23/1.40 # Failure: Out of unprocessed clauses!
% 0.23/1.40 # OLD status GaveUp
% 0.23/1.40 # Parsed axioms : 44
% 0.23/1.40 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 40
% 0.23/1.40 # Initial clauses : 9
% 0.23/1.40 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.23/1.40 # Initial clauses in saturation : 9
% 0.23/1.40 # Processed clauses : 17
% 0.23/1.40 # ...of these trivial : 2
% 0.23/1.40 # ...subsumed : 1
% 0.23/1.40 # ...remaining for further processing : 14
% 0.23/1.40 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 2
% 0.23/1.40 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.23/1.40 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.23/1.40 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.23/1.40 # Generated clauses : 11
% 0.23/1.40 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 8
% 0.23/1.40 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.23/1.40 # Paramodulations : 9
% 0.23/1.40 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.23/1.40 # Equation resolutions : 2
% 0.23/1.40 # Current number of processed clauses : 12
% 0.23/1.40 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 4
% 0.23/1.40 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.23/1.40 # Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.23/1.40 # Non-unit-clauses : 7
% 0.23/1.40 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.23/1.40 # ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 0.23/1.40 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.23/1.40 # Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 0.23/1.40 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 8
% 0.23/1.40 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 8
% 0.23/1.40 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 1
% 0.23/1.40 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2
% 0.23/1.40 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.23/1.40 # BW rewrite match attempts : 6
% 0.23/1.40 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.23/1.40 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.23/1.40 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.23/1.40 # Termbank termtop insertions : 962
% 0.23/1.40
% 0.23/1.40 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.23/1.40 # User time : 0.012 s
% 0.23/1.40 # System time : 0.003 s
% 0.23/1.40 # Total time : 0.015 s
% 0.23/1.40 # Maximum resident set size: 2760 pages
% 0.23/1.40 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_f171197f65f27d1ba69648a20c844832c84a5dd7 for 23 seconds:
% 0.23/1.40 # Preprocessing time : 0.019 s
% 0.23/1.40
% 0.23/1.40 # Proof found!
% 0.23/1.40 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.23/1.40 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.23/1.40 # Proof object total steps : 20
% 0.23/1.40 # Proof object clause steps : 11
% 0.23/1.40 # Proof object formula steps : 9
% 0.23/1.40 # Proof object conjectures : 7
% 0.23/1.40 # Proof object clause conjectures : 4
% 0.23/1.40 # Proof object formula conjectures : 3
% 0.23/1.40 # Proof object initial clauses used : 6
% 0.23/1.40 # Proof object initial formulas used : 4
% 0.23/1.40 # Proof object generating inferences : 4
% 0.23/1.40 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 4
% 0.23/1.40 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.23/1.40 # Parsed axioms : 44
% 0.23/1.40 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.23/1.40 # Initial clauses : 91
% 0.23/1.40 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 8
% 0.23/1.40 # Initial clauses in saturation : 83
% 0.23/1.40 # Processed clauses : 376
% 0.23/1.40 # ...of these trivial : 2
% 0.23/1.40 # ...subsumed : 121
% 0.23/1.40 # ...remaining for further processing : 253
% 0.23/1.40 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 9
% 0.23/1.40 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.23/1.40 # Backward-subsumed : 8
% 0.23/1.40 # Backward-rewritten : 25
% 0.23/1.40 # Generated clauses : 1781
% 0.23/1.40 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 1625
% 0.23/1.40 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 46
% 0.23/1.40 # Paramodulations : 1762
% 0.23/1.40 # Factorizations : 8
% 0.23/1.40 # Equation resolutions : 11
% 0.23/1.40 # Current number of processed clauses : 216
% 0.23/1.40 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 35
% 0.23/1.40 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.23/1.40 # Negative unit clauses : 12
% 0.23/1.40 # Non-unit-clauses : 169
% 0.23/1.40 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 1176
% 0.23/1.40 # ...number of literals in the above : 3681
% 0.23/1.40 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.23/1.40 # Current number of archived clauses : 41
% 0.23/1.40 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 5052
% 0.23/1.40 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 3963
% 0.23/1.40 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 110
% 0.23/1.40 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 691
% 0.23/1.40 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.23/1.40 # BW rewrite match attempts : 27
% 0.23/1.40 # BW rewrite match successes : 6
% 0.23/1.40 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.23/1.40 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.23/1.40 # Termbank termtop insertions : 37918
% 0.23/1.40
% 0.23/1.40 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.23/1.40 # User time : 0.063 s
% 0.23/1.40 # System time : 0.001 s
% 0.23/1.40 # Total time : 0.064 s
% 0.23/1.40 # Maximum resident set size: 4952 pages
% 0.23/23.48 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.23/23.50 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.23/23.50 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.51 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.23/23.51 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.51 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.23/23.51 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.52 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.23/23.52 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.53 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.23/23.53 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.53 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.23/23.53 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.54 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.23/23.54 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.54 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.23/23.54 eprover: No such file or directory
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------