TSTP Solution File: SET064-6 by iProver---3.9
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : iProver---3.9
% Problem : SET064-6 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_iprover %s %d THM
% Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri May 3 02:59:39 EDT 2024
% Result : Unsatisfiable 3.88s 1.14s
% Output : CNFRefutation 3.88s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (Could not find formula named definition)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(c_49,negated_conjecture,
z != null_class,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_null_class_is_unique_1) ).
cnf(c_50,negated_conjecture,
~ member(not_subclass_element(z,null_class),z),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_null_class_is_unique_2) ).
cnf(c_52,plain,
( member(not_subclass_element(X0,X1),X0)
| subclass(X0,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',not_subclass_members1) ).
cnf(c_53,plain,
( ~ member(not_subclass_element(X0,X1),X1)
| subclass(X0,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',not_subclass_members2) ).
cnf(c_57,plain,
( ~ subclass(X0,X1)
| ~ subclass(X1,X0)
| X0 = X1 ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',subclass_implies_equal) ).
cnf(c_71,plain,
( ~ member(X0,intersection(X1,X2))
| member(X0,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',intersection1) ).
cnf(c_117,plain,
( intersection(X0,regular(X0)) = null_class
| X0 = null_class ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',regularity2) ).
cnf(c_2693,plain,
not_subclass_element(z,null_class) = sP0_iProver_def,
definition ).
cnf(c_2694,negated_conjecture,
~ member(sP0_iProver_def,z),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_50,c_2693]) ).
cnf(c_2695,negated_conjecture,
z != null_class,
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_49]) ).
cnf(c_3672,plain,
( member(sP0_iProver_def,z)
| subclass(z,null_class) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_2693,c_52]) ).
cnf(c_3673,plain,
subclass(z,null_class),
inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_3672,c_2694]) ).
cnf(c_3727,plain,
( member(not_subclass_element(intersection(X0,X1),X2),X0)
| subclass(intersection(X0,X1),X2) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_52,c_71]) ).
cnf(c_4439,plain,
( ~ subclass(null_class,z)
| z = null_class ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_3673,c_57]) ).
cnf(c_4444,plain,
~ subclass(null_class,z),
inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_4439,c_2695]) ).
cnf(c_7041,plain,
subclass(intersection(X0,X1),X0),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_3727,c_53]) ).
cnf(c_7208,plain,
( X0 = null_class
| subclass(null_class,X0) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_117,c_7041]) ).
cnf(c_7278,plain,
z = null_class,
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_7208,c_4444]) ).
cnf(c_7279,plain,
$false,
inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_7278,c_2695]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.11 % Problem : SET064-6 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% 0.03/0.12 % Command : run_iprover %s %d THM
% 0.12/0.32 % Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.32 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.32 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.32 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.32 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.32 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.32 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.32 % DateTime : Thu May 2 20:36:48 EDT 2024
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.17/0.44 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.17/0.44 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/run_problem --schedule fof_schedule --heuristic_context casc_unsat --no_cores 8 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 3.88/1.14 % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 3.88/1.14 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 3.88/1.14
% 3.88/1.14 %---------------- iProver v3.9 (pre CASC 2024/SMT-COMP 2024) ----------------%
% 3.88/1.14
% 3.88/1.14 ------ iProver source info
% 3.88/1.14
% 3.88/1.14 git: date: 2024-05-02 19:28:25 +0000
% 3.88/1.14 git: sha1: a33b5eb135c74074ba803943bb12f2ebd971352f
% 3.88/1.14 git: non_committed_changes: false
% 3.88/1.14
% 3.88/1.14 ------ Parsing...successful
% 3.88/1.14
% 3.88/1.14
% 3.88/1.14
% 3.88/1.14 ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 2 sf_s rm: 1 0s sf_e pe_s pe:1:0s pe:2:0s pe_e sup_sim: 0 sf_s rm: 2 0s sf_e pe_s pe_e
% 3.88/1.14
% 3.88/1.14 ------ Preprocessing... gs_s sp: 0 0s gs_e snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e
% 3.88/1.14
% 3.88/1.14 ------ Preprocessing... sf_s rm: 1 0s sf_e sf_s rm: 0 0s sf_e
% 3.88/1.14 ------ Proving...
% 3.88/1.14 ------ Problem Properties
% 3.88/1.14
% 3.88/1.14
% 3.88/1.14 clauses 86
% 3.88/1.14 conjectures 2
% 3.88/1.14 EPR 14
% 3.88/1.14 Horn 78
% 3.88/1.14 unary 34
% 3.88/1.14 binary 32
% 3.88/1.14 lits 164
% 3.88/1.14 lits eq 38
% 3.88/1.14 fd_pure 0
% 3.88/1.14 fd_pseudo 0
% 3.88/1.14 fd_cond 3
% 3.88/1.14 fd_pseudo_cond 3
% 3.88/1.14 AC symbols 0
% 3.88/1.14
% 3.88/1.14 ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on
% 3.88/1.14
% 3.88/1.14 ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" Time Limit: 10.
% 3.88/1.14
% 3.88/1.14
% 3.88/1.14 ------
% 3.88/1.14 Current options:
% 3.88/1.14 ------
% 3.88/1.14
% 3.88/1.14
% 3.88/1.14
% 3.88/1.14
% 3.88/1.14 ------ Proving...
% 3.88/1.14
% 3.88/1.14
% 3.88/1.14 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 3.88/1.14
% 3.88/1.14 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 3.88/1.14
% 3.88/1.14
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------