TSTP Solution File: SET064+1 by Enigma---0.5.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : SET064+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v5.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 00:08:54 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 7.79s 2.44s
% Output : CNFRefutation 7.79s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 2
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 7 ( 5 unt; 2 nHn; 5 RR)
% Number of literals : 9 ( 4 equ; 4 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 3 ( 3 usr; 2 con; 0-1 aty)
% Number of variables : 4 ( 2 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_53,negated_conjecture,
~ member(X1,esk5_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-1ej7q0u_/input.p',i_0_53) ).
cnf(i_0_62,plain,
( X1 = null_class
| member(esk6_1(X1),X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-1ej7q0u_/input.p',i_0_62) ).
cnf(i_0_54,negated_conjecture,
esk5_0 != null_class,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-1ej7q0u_/input.p',i_0_54) ).
cnf(c_0_66,negated_conjecture,
~ member(X1,esk5_0),
i_0_53 ).
cnf(c_0_67,plain,
( X1 = null_class
| member(esk6_1(X1),X1) ),
i_0_62 ).
cnf(c_0_68,negated_conjecture,
esk5_0 != null_class,
i_0_54 ).
cnf(c_0_69,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_66,c_0_67]),c_0_68]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : SET064+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v5.4.0.
% 0.03/0.13 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Sun Jul 10 13:59:04 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.45 # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.19/0.45 # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.45 # Filter: axfilter_auto 0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 0.p
% 0.19/0.45 # Filter: axfilter_auto 1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 1.p
% 0.19/0.45 # Filter: axfilter_auto 2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 2.p
% 7.79/2.44 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by G_E___302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y:
% 7.79/2.44 # Version: 2.1pre011
% 7.79/2.44 # Preprocessing time : 0.020 s
% 7.79/2.44
% 7.79/2.44 # Proof found!
% 7.79/2.44 # SZS status Theorem
% 7.79/2.44 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 7.79/2.44 # Proof object total steps : 7
% 7.79/2.44 # Proof object clause steps : 4
% 7.79/2.44 # Proof object formula steps : 3
% 7.79/2.44 # Proof object conjectures : 5
% 7.79/2.44 # Proof object clause conjectures : 3
% 7.79/2.44 # Proof object formula conjectures : 2
% 7.79/2.44 # Proof object initial clauses used : 3
% 7.79/2.44 # Proof object initial formulas used : 3
% 7.79/2.44 # Proof object generating inferences : 1
% 7.79/2.44 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 1
% 7.79/2.44 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 7.79/2.44 # Parsed axioms : 83
% 7.79/2.44 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 7.79/2.44 # Initial clauses : 83
% 7.79/2.44 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 7.79/2.44 # Initial clauses in saturation : 83
% 7.79/2.44 # Processed clauses : 24
% 7.79/2.44 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 7.79/2.44 # ...subsumed : 0
% 7.79/2.44 # ...remaining for further processing : 24
% 7.79/2.44 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 2
% 7.79/2.44 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 7.79/2.44 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 7.79/2.44 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 7.79/2.44 # Generated clauses : 18
% 7.79/2.44 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 16
% 7.79/2.44 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 7.79/2.44 # Paramodulations : 16
% 7.79/2.44 # Factorizations : 0
% 7.79/2.44 # Equation resolutions : 2
% 7.79/2.44 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 7.79/2.44 # Propositional unsat check successes : 0
% 7.79/2.44 # Current number of processed clauses : 22
% 7.79/2.44 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 8
% 7.79/2.44 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 7.79/2.44 # Negative unit clauses : 3
% 7.79/2.44 # Non-unit-clauses : 11
% 7.79/2.44 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 74
% 7.79/2.44 # ...number of literals in the above : 164
% 7.79/2.44 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 7.79/2.44 # Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 7.79/2.44 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 11
% 7.79/2.44 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 11
% 7.79/2.44 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 7.79/2.44 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2
% 7.79/2.44 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 7.79/2.44 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 7.79/2.44 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 7.79/2.44 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 7.79/2.44 # Condensation successes : 0
% 7.79/2.44 # Termbank termtop insertions : 2241
% 7.79/2.44
% 7.79/2.44 # -------------------------------------------------
% 7.79/2.44 # User time : 0.016 s
% 7.79/2.44 # System time : 0.005 s
% 7.79/2.44 # Total time : 0.021 s
% 7.79/2.44 # ...preprocessing : 0.020 s
% 7.79/2.44 # ...main loop : 0.001 s
% 7.79/2.44 # Maximum resident set size: 7132 pages
% 7.79/2.44
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------