TSTP Solution File: SET060+1 by SInE---0.4

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SInE---0.4
% Problem  : SET060+1 : TPTP v5.3.0. Bugfixed v5.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : Source/sine.py -e eprover -t %d %s

% Computer : monitor.cs.miami.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Core(TM)2 CPU          6600  @ 2.40GHz @ 2400MHz
% Memory   : 1003MB
% OS       : Linux 2.6.32.26-175.fc12.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Jun 15 08:04:18 EDT 2012

% Result   : Theorem 0.05s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.05s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   11
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   25 (  13 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   66 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    7 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   73 (  32   ~;  23   |;  15   &)
%                                         (   3 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    9 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   40 (   2 sgn  28   !;   4   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(3,axiom,
    ! [X1,X4] :
      ( member(X4,complement(X1))
    <=> ( member(X4,universal_class)
        & ~ member(X4,X1) ) ),
    file('/tmp/tmprANTLU/sel_SET060+1.p_1',complement) ).

fof(11,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X4] :
      ( member(X4,intersection(X1,X2))
    <=> ( member(X4,X1)
        & member(X4,X2) ) ),
    file('/tmp/tmprANTLU/sel_SET060+1.p_1',intersection) ).

fof(13,conjecture,
    ! [X1,X2] : ~ member(X2,intersection(complement(X1),X1)),
    file('/tmp/tmprANTLU/sel_SET060+1.p_1',special_classes_lemma) ).

fof(14,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1,X2] : ~ member(X2,intersection(complement(X1),X1)),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[13]) ).

fof(15,plain,
    ! [X1,X4] :
      ( member(X4,complement(X1))
    <=> ( member(X4,universal_class)
        & ~ member(X4,X1) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[3,theory(equality)]) ).

fof(17,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1,X2] : ~ member(X2,intersection(complement(X1),X1)),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[14,theory(equality)]) ).

fof(32,plain,
    ! [X1,X4] :
      ( ( ~ member(X4,complement(X1))
        | ( member(X4,universal_class)
          & ~ member(X4,X1) ) )
      & ( ~ member(X4,universal_class)
        | member(X4,X1)
        | member(X4,complement(X1)) ) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[15]) ).

fof(33,plain,
    ! [X5,X6] :
      ( ( ~ member(X6,complement(X5))
        | ( member(X6,universal_class)
          & ~ member(X6,X5) ) )
      & ( ~ member(X6,universal_class)
        | member(X6,X5)
        | member(X6,complement(X5)) ) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[32]) ).

fof(34,plain,
    ! [X5,X6] :
      ( ( member(X6,universal_class)
        | ~ member(X6,complement(X5)) )
      & ( ~ member(X6,X5)
        | ~ member(X6,complement(X5)) )
      & ( ~ member(X6,universal_class)
        | member(X6,X5)
        | member(X6,complement(X5)) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[33]) ).

cnf(36,plain,
    ( ~ member(X1,complement(X2))
    | ~ member(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[34]) ).

fof(64,plain,
    ! [X1,X2,X4] :
      ( ( ~ member(X4,intersection(X1,X2))
        | ( member(X4,X1)
          & member(X4,X2) ) )
      & ( ~ member(X4,X1)
        | ~ member(X4,X2)
        | member(X4,intersection(X1,X2)) ) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[11]) ).

fof(65,plain,
    ! [X5,X6,X7] :
      ( ( ~ member(X7,intersection(X5,X6))
        | ( member(X7,X5)
          & member(X7,X6) ) )
      & ( ~ member(X7,X5)
        | ~ member(X7,X6)
        | member(X7,intersection(X5,X6)) ) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[64]) ).

fof(66,plain,
    ! [X5,X6,X7] :
      ( ( member(X7,X5)
        | ~ member(X7,intersection(X5,X6)) )
      & ( member(X7,X6)
        | ~ member(X7,intersection(X5,X6)) )
      & ( ~ member(X7,X5)
        | ~ member(X7,X6)
        | member(X7,intersection(X5,X6)) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[65]) ).

cnf(68,plain,
    ( member(X1,X3)
    | ~ member(X1,intersection(X2,X3)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[66]) ).

cnf(69,plain,
    ( member(X1,X2)
    | ~ member(X1,intersection(X2,X3)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[66]) ).

fof(72,negated_conjecture,
    ? [X1,X2] : member(X2,intersection(complement(X1),X1)),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[17]) ).

fof(73,negated_conjecture,
    ? [X3,X4] : member(X4,intersection(complement(X3),X3)),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[72]) ).

fof(74,negated_conjecture,
    member(esk3_0,intersection(complement(esk2_0),esk2_0)),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[73]) ).

cnf(75,negated_conjecture,
    member(esk3_0,intersection(complement(esk2_0),esk2_0)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[74]) ).

cnf(78,negated_conjecture,
    member(esk3_0,esk2_0),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[68,75,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(79,negated_conjecture,
    member(esk3_0,complement(esk2_0)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[69,75,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(107,negated_conjecture,
    ~ member(esk3_0,esk2_0),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[36,79,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(109,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[107,78,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(110,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[109,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(111,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    110,
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% /home/graph/tptp/Systems/SInE---0.4/Source/sine.py:10: DeprecationWarning: the sets module is deprecated
%   from sets import Set
% % SZS status Started for /home/graph/tptp/TPTP/Problems/SET/SET060+1.p
% --creating new selector for [SET005+0.ax]
% -running prover on /tmp/tmprANTLU/sel_SET060+1.p_1 with time limit 29
% -running prover with command ['/davis/home/graph/tptp/Systems/SInE---0.4/Source/./Source/PROVER/eproof.working', '-s', '-tLPO4', '-xAuto', '-tAuto', '--memory-limit=768', '--tptp3-format', '--cpu-limit=29', '/tmp/tmprANTLU/sel_SET060+1.p_1']
% -prover status Theorem
% Problem SET060+1.p solved in phase 0.
% % SZS status Theorem for /home/graph/tptp/TPTP/Problems/SET/SET060+1.p
% % SZS status Ended for /home/graph/tptp/TPTP/Problems/SET/SET060+1.p
% Solved 1 out of 1.
% # Problem is unsatisfiable (or provable), constructing proof object
% # SZS status Theorem
% # SZS output start CNFRefutation.
% See solution above
% # SZS output end CNFRefutation
% 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------