TSTP Solution File: SET056+1 by E-SAT---3.1.00
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.1.00
% Problem : SET056+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Bugfixed v5.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 21 02:57:14 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 0.19s 0.49s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.19s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 7
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 18 ( 4 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 54 ( 9 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 7 ( 3 avg)
% Number of connectives : 59 ( 23 ~; 22 |; 11 &)
% ( 2 <=>; 1 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 10 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 3 ( 3 usr; 2 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 32 ( 0 sgn 18 !; 4 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(equality1,conjecture,
! [X1,X2] :
( X1 = X2
| ? [X3] :
( member(X3,X1)
& ~ member(X3,X2) )
| ? [X7] :
( member(X7,X2)
& ~ member(X7,X1) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',equality1) ).
fof(subclass_defn,axiom,
! [X1,X2] :
( subclass(X1,X2)
<=> ! [X3] :
( member(X3,X1)
=> member(X3,X2) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SET005+0.ax',subclass_defn) ).
fof(extensionality,axiom,
! [X1,X2] :
( X1 = X2
<=> ( subclass(X1,X2)
& subclass(X2,X1) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SET005+0.ax',extensionality) ).
fof(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X1,X2] :
( X1 = X2
| ? [X3] :
( member(X3,X1)
& ~ member(X3,X2) )
| ? [X7] :
( member(X7,X2)
& ~ member(X7,X1) ) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[equality1])]) ).
fof(c_0_4,plain,
! [X10,X11,X12,X13,X14] :
( ( ~ subclass(X10,X11)
| ~ member(X12,X10)
| member(X12,X11) )
& ( member(esk1_2(X13,X14),X13)
| subclass(X13,X14) )
& ( ~ member(esk1_2(X13,X14),X14)
| subclass(X13,X14) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[subclass_defn])])])])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
! [X109,X110] :
( esk8_0 != esk9_0
& ( ~ member(X109,esk8_0)
| member(X109,esk9_0) )
& ( ~ member(X110,esk9_0)
| member(X110,esk8_0) ) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_3])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,plain,
( subclass(X1,X2)
| ~ member(esk1_2(X1,X2),X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
( member(X1,esk9_0)
| ~ member(X1,esk8_0) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
fof(c_0_8,plain,
! [X17,X18] :
( ( subclass(X17,X18)
| X17 != X18 )
& ( subclass(X18,X17)
| X17 != X18 )
& ( ~ subclass(X17,X18)
| ~ subclass(X18,X17)
| X17 = X18 ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[extensionality])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
( subclass(X1,esk9_0)
| ~ member(esk1_2(X1,esk9_0),esk8_0) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
( member(esk1_2(X1,X2),X1)
| subclass(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
( member(X1,esk8_0)
| ~ member(X1,esk9_0) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
( X1 = X2
| ~ subclass(X1,X2)
| ~ subclass(X2,X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
subclass(esk8_0,esk9_0),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
esk8_0 != esk9_0,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
( member(esk1_2(esk9_0,X1),esk8_0)
| subclass(esk9_0,X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
~ subclass(esk9_0,esk8_0),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]),c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_15]),c_0_16]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : SET056+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Bugfixed v5.4.0.
% 0.03/0.13 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.13/0.33 % Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Mon May 20 12:51:52 EDT 2024
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.46 Running first-order model finding
% 0.19/0.46 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.49 # Version: 3.1.0
% 0.19/0.49 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.19/0.49 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.19/0.49 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.19/0.49 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.49 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.49 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.49 # G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 15505 completed with status 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.19/0.49 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.19/0.49 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.19/0.49 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.19/0.49 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.19/0.49 # Search class: FGHSM-FFMS21-DFFFFFNN
% 0.19/0.49 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.19/0.49 # Starting new_ho_10 with 271s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.49 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.49 # Starting ho_unfolding_3 with 271s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.49 # Starting new_ho_10_cnf2 with 271s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.49 # Starting pre_casc_2 with 271s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.49 # ho_unfolding_3 with pid 15517 completed with status 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Result found by ho_unfolding_3
% 0.19/0.49 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.19/0.49 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.19/0.49 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.19/0.49 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.19/0.49 # Search class: FGHSM-FFMS21-DFFFFFNN
% 0.19/0.49 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.19/0.49 # Starting new_ho_10 with 271s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.49 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.49 # Starting ho_unfolding_3 with 271s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.49 # Preprocessing time : 0.002 s
% 0.19/0.49 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.19/0.49
% 0.19/0.49 # Proof found!
% 0.19/0.49 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.19/0.49 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.19/0.49 # Parsed axioms : 44
% 0.19/0.49 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Initial clauses : 92
% 0.19/0.49 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 8
% 0.19/0.49 # Initial clauses in saturation : 84
% 0.19/0.49 # Processed clauses : 192
% 0.19/0.49 # ...of these trivial : 4
% 0.19/0.49 # ...subsumed : 17
% 0.19/0.49 # ...remaining for further processing : 171
% 0.19/0.49 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 6
% 0.19/0.49 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Backward-rewritten : 1
% 0.19/0.49 # Generated clauses : 183
% 0.19/0.49 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 167
% 0.19/0.49 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Paramodulations : 177
% 0.19/0.49 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # NegExts : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Equation resolutions : 6
% 0.19/0.49 # Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Total rewrite steps : 28
% 0.19/0.49 # ...of those cached : 18
% 0.19/0.49 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.19/0.49 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.19/0.49 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.19/0.49 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.19/0.49 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.19/0.49 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.19/0.49 # Current number of processed clauses : 81
% 0.19/0.49 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 21
% 0.19/0.49 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Negative unit clauses : 4
% 0.19/0.49 # Non-unit-clauses : 56
% 0.19/0.49 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 140
% 0.19/0.49 # ...number of literals in the above : 336
% 0.19/0.49 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Current number of archived clauses : 92
% 0.19/0.49 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 1489
% 0.19/0.49 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1346
% 0.19/0.49 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 9
% 0.19/0.49 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 157
% 0.19/0.49 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # BW rewrite match attempts : 3
% 0.19/0.49 # BW rewrite match successes : 1
% 0.19/0.49 # Condensation attempts : 192
% 0.19/0.49 # Condensation successes : 2
% 0.19/0.49 # Termbank termtop insertions : 9289
% 0.19/0.49 # Search garbage collected termcells : 1007
% 0.19/0.49
% 0.19/0.49 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.49 # User time : 0.013 s
% 0.19/0.49 # System time : 0.007 s
% 0.19/0.49 # Total time : 0.020 s
% 0.19/0.49 # Maximum resident set size: 2008 pages
% 0.19/0.49
% 0.19/0.49 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.49 # User time : 0.064 s
% 0.19/0.49 # System time : 0.013 s
% 0.19/0.49 # Total time : 0.076 s
% 0.19/0.49 # Maximum resident set size: 1760 pages
% 0.19/0.49 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------