TSTP Solution File: SET055-7 by Zipperpin---2.1.9999

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Zipperpin---2.1.9999
% Problem  : SET055-7 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : NO INFORMATION
% Format   : NO INFORMATION
% Command  : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.IzyMhwIqt1 true

% Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 16:12:12 EDT 2023

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 1.30s 0.81s
% Output   : Refutation 1.30s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem  : SET055-7 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.07/0.13  % Command  : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.IzyMhwIqt1 true
% 0.14/0.34  % Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % DateTime : Sat Aug 26 09:15:33 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.14/0.35  % Running portfolio for 300 s
% 0.14/0.35  % File         : /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.14/0.35  % Number of cores: 8
% 0.21/0.35  % Python version: Python 3.6.8
% 0.21/0.35  % Running in FO mode
% 0.21/0.64  % Total configuration time : 435
% 0.21/0.64  % Estimated wc time : 1092
% 0.21/0.64  % Estimated cpu time (7 cpus) : 156.0
% 0.21/0.70  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo6_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.21/0.72  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo3_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.21/0.72  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo1_av.sh running for 75s
% 0.21/0.72  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo7.sh running for 63s
% 0.99/0.74  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo13.sh running for 50s
% 0.99/0.74  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo5.sh running for 50s
% 0.99/0.74  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo4.sh running for 50s
% 1.28/0.78  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo1_lcnf.sh running for 50s
% 1.30/0.81  % Solved by fo/fo5.sh.
% 1.30/0.81  % done 96 iterations in 0.050s
% 1.30/0.81  % SZS status Theorem for '/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p'
% 1.30/0.81  % SZS output start Refutation
% 1.30/0.81  thf(equalish_type, type, equalish: $i > $i > $o).
% 1.30/0.81  thf(x_type, type, x: $i).
% 1.30/0.81  thf(subclass_type, type, subclass: $i > $i > $o).
% 1.30/0.81  thf(prove_reflexivity, conjecture, (equalish @ x @ x)).
% 1.30/0.81  thf(zf_stmt_0, negated_conjecture, (~( equalish @ x @ x )),
% 1.30/0.81    inference('cnf.neg', [status(esa)], [prove_reflexivity])).
% 1.30/0.81  thf(zip_derived_cl164, plain, (~ (equalish @ x @ x)),
% 1.30/0.81      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_0])).
% 1.30/0.81  thf(subclass_is_reflexive, axiom, (subclass @ X @ X)).
% 1.30/0.81  thf(zip_derived_cl162, plain, (![X0 : $i]:  (subclass @ X0 @ X0)),
% 1.30/0.81      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [subclass_is_reflexive])).
% 1.30/0.81  thf(subclass_implies_equal, axiom,
% 1.30/0.81    (( ~( subclass @ X @ Y ) ) | ( ~( subclass @ Y @ X ) ) | 
% 1.30/0.81     ( equalish @ X @ Y ))).
% 1.30/0.81  thf(zip_derived_cl73, plain,
% 1.30/0.81      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 1.30/0.81         (~ (subclass @ X0 @ X1)
% 1.30/0.81          | ~ (subclass @ X1 @ X0)
% 1.30/0.81          |  (equalish @ X0 @ X1))),
% 1.30/0.81      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [subclass_implies_equal])).
% 1.30/0.81  thf(zip_derived_cl334, plain,
% 1.30/0.81      (![X0 : $i]: ( (equalish @ X0 @ X0) | ~ (subclass @ X0 @ X0))),
% 1.30/0.81      inference('sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl162, zip_derived_cl73])).
% 1.30/0.81  thf(zip_derived_cl162, plain, (![X0 : $i]:  (subclass @ X0 @ X0)),
% 1.30/0.81      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [subclass_is_reflexive])).
% 1.30/0.81  thf(zip_derived_cl340, plain, (![X0 : $i]:  (equalish @ X0 @ X0)),
% 1.30/0.81      inference('demod', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl334, zip_derived_cl162])).
% 1.30/0.81  thf(zip_derived_cl361, plain, ($false),
% 1.30/0.81      inference('demod', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl164, zip_derived_cl340])).
% 1.30/0.81  
% 1.30/0.81  % SZS output end Refutation
% 1.30/0.81  
% 1.30/0.81  
% 1.30/0.81  % Terminating...
% 1.30/0.85  % Runner terminated.
% 1.70/0.86  % Zipperpin 1.5 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------