TSTP Solution File: SET055-7 by SNARK---20120808r022

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SNARK---20120808r022
% Problem  : SET055-7 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run-snark %s %d

% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 05:06:31 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.64s 0.82s
% Output   : Refutation 0.64s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    2
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :    6 (   4 unt;   0 nHn;   5 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   10 (   0 equ;   6 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    1 (   1 usr;   1 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    7 (   1 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(transitivity,axiom,
    ( ~ equalish(X,Y)
    | ~ equalish(Y,Z)
    | equalish(X,Z) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',transitivity) ).

cnf(subclass_implies_equal,axiom,
    ( ~ subclass(X,Y)
    | ~ subclass(Y,X)
    | equalish(X,Y) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',subclass_implies_equal) ).

cnf(subclass_is_reflexive,axiom,
    subclass(X,X),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',subclass_is_reflexive) ).

cnf(prove_reflexivity,negated_conjecture,
    ~ equalish(x,x),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_reflexivity) ).

cnf(269,plain,
    ~ equalish(x,X),
    inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[transitivity,prove_reflexivity]) ).

cnf(1437,plain,
    $false,
    inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[subclass_implies_equal,269,subclass_is_reflexive,subclass_is_reflexive]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.11  % Problem  : SET055-7 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.07/0.12  % Command  : run-snark %s %d
% 0.13/0.33  % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.33  % DateTime : Sat Jul  9 19:50:11 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.19/0.44  /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.44  * 
% 0.19/0.45  * 
% 0.19/0.45  #<PACKAGE "SNARK-USER">
% 0.19/0.45  * 
% 0.19/0.45  SNARK-TPTP-OPTIONS
% 0.19/0.45  * 
% 0.19/0.45  ((AGENDA-LENGTH-LIMIT NIL) (AGENDA-LENGTH-BEFORE-SIMPLIFICATION-LIMIT NIL)
% 0.19/0.45   (USE-HYPERRESOLUTION T) (USE-UR-RESOLUTION T) (USE-PARAMODULATION T)
% 0.19/0.45   (USE-FACTORING :POS)
% 0.19/0.45   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-HYPERRESOLUTION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.19/0.45   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-PARAMODULATION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.19/0.45   (ORDERING-FUNCTIONS>CONSTANTS T) (ASSERT-CONTEXT :CURRENT)
% 0.19/0.45   (RUN-TIME-LIMIT 300) (LISTEN-FOR-COMMANDS NIL)
% 0.19/0.45   (USE-CLOSURE-WHEN-SATISFIABLE T) (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-GIVEN NIL)
% 0.19/0.45   (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-DERIVED NIL) (PRINT-UNORIENTABLE-ROWS NIL)
% 0.19/0.45   (PRINT-ROW-WFFS-PRETTILY NIL) (PRINT-FINAL-ROWS :TPTP)
% 0.19/0.45   (PRINT-OPTIONS-WHEN-STARTING NIL) (USE-VARIABLE-NAME-SORTS NIL)
% 0.19/0.45   (USE-PURITY-TEST T) (USE-RELEVANCE-TEST T) (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS1)
% 0.19/0.45   (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS2))
% 0.19/0.45  * 
% 0.19/0.45  "."
% 0.19/0.45  * 
% 0.19/0.45  ; Begin refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-07-09T19:50:11
% 0.19/0.45  ; Running SNARK from /davis/home/graph/tptp/Systems/SNARK---20120808r022/Source/snark-system.lisp in SBCL 1.0.12 on n011.cluster.edu at 2022-07-09T19:50:11
% 0.19/0.49  
% 0.19/0.50  ; Recognized commutativity assertion (OR (NOT (|equalish| ?X ?Y)) (|equalish| ?Y ?X)).
% 0.64/0.82  ; Declaring equalish to be commutative.
% 0.64/0.82  
% 0.64/0.82  #||
% 0.64/0.82  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.64/0.82  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.64/0.82  ||#
% 0.64/0.82  
% 0.64/0.82  ; Summary of computation:
% 0.64/0.82  ;      4980 formulas have been input or derived (from 166 formulas).
% 0.64/0.82  ;      1437 (29%) were retained.  Of these,
% 0.64/0.82  ;           12 ( 1%) were simplified or subsumed later,
% 0.64/0.82  ;         1425 (99%) are still being kept.
% 0.64/0.82  ; 
% 0.64/0.82  ; Run time in seconds excluding printing time:
% 0.64/0.82  ;     0.030   8%   Read assertion file          (1 call)
% 0.64/0.82  ;     0.003   1%   Assert                       (165 calls)
% 0.64/0.82  ;     0.121  33%   Process new row              (2,567 calls)
% 0.64/0.82  ;     0.087  24%   Resolution                   (330 calls)
% 0.64/0.82  ;     0.001   0%   Paramodulation               (165 calls)
% 0.64/0.82  ;     0.000   0%   Factoring                    (3 calls)
% 0.64/0.82  ;     0.005   1%   Condensing                   (381 calls)
% 0.64/0.82  ;     0.015   4%   Forward subsumption          (381 calls)
% 0.64/0.82  ;     0.010   3%   Backward subsumption         (366 calls)
% 0.64/0.82  ;     0.002   1%   Clause clause subsumption    (429 calls)
% 0.64/0.82  ;     0.032   9%   Forward simplification       (2,567 calls)
% 0.64/0.82  ;     0.014   4%   Backward simplification      (1,437 calls)
% 0.64/0.82  ;     0.002   1%   Ordering                     (487 calls)
% 0.64/0.82  ;     0.000   0%   Sortal reasoning             (32 calls)
% 0.64/0.82  ;     0.000   0%   Purity testing               (1 call)
% 0.64/0.82  ;     0.042  12%   Other
% 0.64/0.82  ;     0.364        Total
% 0.64/0.82  ;     0.366        Real time
% 0.64/0.82  ; 
% 0.64/0.82  ; Term-hash-array has 3,994 terms in all.
% 0.64/0.82  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 366 entries (366 at peak, 366 added, 0 deleted).
% 0.64/0.82  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 1,953 nodes (1,953 at peak, 1,953 added, 0 deleted).
% 0.64/0.82  ;  Retrieved 351 possibly forward subsuming rows in 381 calls.
% 0.64/0.82  ;  Retrieved 118 possibly backward subsumed rows in 366 calls.
% 0.64/0.82  ; Path-index has 3,991 entries (3,991 at peak, 4,003 added, 12 deleted).
% 0.64/0.82  ; Path-index has 24,139 nodes (24,139 at peak, 24,139 added, 0 deleted).
% 0.64/0.82  ; Trie-index has 3,991 entries (3,991 at peak, 4,003 added, 12 deleted).
% 0.64/0.82  ; Trie-index has 21,717 nodes (21,717 at peak, 21,736 added, 19 deleted).
% 0.64/0.82  ; Retrieved 2,329 generalization terms in 2,818 calls.
% 0.64/0.82  ; Retrieved 1,316 instance terms in 1,070 calls.
% 0.64/0.82  ; Retrieved 87,430 unifiable terms in 5,156 calls.
% 0.64/0.82  ; 
% 0.64/0.82  ; The agenda of rows to process has 89 entries:
% 0.64/0.82  ;    11 with value 6               5 with value 11               1 with value 15
% 0.64/0.82  ;    17 with value 8               8 with value 12               6 with value 17
% 0.64/0.82  ;    20 with value 9               8 with value 13               1 with value 20
% 0.64/0.82  ;    10 with value 10              1 with value 14               1 with value 24
% 0.64/0.82  ; The agenda of rows to give has 1260 entries:
% 0.64/0.82  ;     1 with value (4 5)         127 with value (4 17)          39 with value (4 28)
% 0.64/0.82  ;     1 with value (4 6)         121 with value (4 18)           6 with value (4 29)
% 0.64/0.82  ;     4 with value (4 7)         127 with value (4 19)          23 with value (4 30)
% 0.64/0.82  ;     8 with value (4 8)         110 with value (4 20)           4 with value (4 31)
% 0.64/0.82  ;     4 with value (4 9)         100 with value (4 21)           1 with value (4 32)
% 0.64/0.82  ;     9 with value (4 10)         79 with value (4 22)           3 with value (4 34)
% 0.64/0.82  ;     8 with value (4 11)         23 with value (4 23)           2 with value (4 36)
% 0.64/0.82  ;    21 with value (4 12)         82 with value (4 24)           1 with value (4 39)
% 0.64/0.82  ;    48 with value (4 13)         10 with value (4 25)           1 with value (4 41)
% 0.64/0.82  ;    46 with value (4 14)         76 with value (4 26)           1 with value (4 43)
% 0.64/0.82  ;    67 with value (4 15)          5 with value (4 27)           1 with value (4 47)
% 0.64/0.82  ;   101 with value (4 16)
% 0.64/0.82  Evaluation took:
% 0.64/0.82    0.366 seconds of real time
% 0.64/0.82    0.346255 seconds of user run time
% 0.64/0.82    0.020252 seconds of system run time
% 0.64/0.82    [Run times include 0.029 seconds GC run time.]
% 0.64/0.82    0 calls to %EVAL
% 0.64/0.82    0 page faults and
% 0.64/0.82    30,396,216 bytes consed.
% 0.64/0.82  :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.64/0.82  ; End refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-07-09T19:50:11
% 0.64/0.82  :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.64/0.82  * 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------