TSTP Solution File: SET055-7 by CSE_E---1.5
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CSE_E---1.5
% Problem : SET055-7 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 14:32:33 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.20s 0.61s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.20s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 3
% Number of leaves : 52
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 57 ( 6 unt; 49 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 12 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 10 ( 6 ~; 4 |; 0 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 4 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of types : 2 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 67 ( 40 >; 27 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of predicates : 11 ( 10 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 39 ( 39 usr; 9 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 7 ( 0 sgn; 0 !; 0 ?; 0 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
tff(decl_22,type,
equalish: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).
tff(decl_23,type,
apply: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).
tff(decl_24,type,
cantor: $i > $i ).
tff(decl_25,type,
complement: $i > $i ).
tff(decl_26,type,
compose: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).
tff(decl_27,type,
cross_product: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).
tff(decl_28,type,
diagonalise: $i > $i ).
tff(decl_29,type,
symmetric_difference: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).
tff(decl_30,type,
domain: ( $i * $i * $i ) > $i ).
tff(decl_31,type,
domain_of: $i > $i ).
tff(decl_32,type,
first: $i > $i ).
tff(decl_33,type,
flip: $i > $i ).
tff(decl_34,type,
image: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).
tff(decl_35,type,
intersection: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).
tff(decl_36,type,
inverse: $i > $i ).
tff(decl_37,type,
not_homomorphism1: ( $i * $i * $i ) > $i ).
tff(decl_38,type,
not_homomorphism2: ( $i * $i * $i ) > $i ).
tff(decl_39,type,
not_subclass_element: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).
tff(decl_40,type,
ordered_pair: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).
tff(decl_41,type,
power_class: $i > $i ).
tff(decl_42,type,
range: ( $i * $i * $i ) > $i ).
tff(decl_43,type,
range_of: $i > $i ).
tff(decl_44,type,
regular: $i > $i ).
tff(decl_45,type,
restrict: ( $i * $i * $i ) > $i ).
tff(decl_46,type,
rotate: $i > $i ).
tff(decl_47,type,
second: $i > $i ).
tff(decl_48,type,
singleton: $i > $i ).
tff(decl_49,type,
successor: $i > $i ).
tff(decl_50,type,
sum_class: $i > $i ).
tff(decl_51,type,
union: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).
tff(decl_52,type,
unordered_pair: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).
tff(decl_53,type,
compatible: ( $i * $i * $i ) > $o ).
tff(decl_54,type,
function: $i > $o ).
tff(decl_55,type,
homomorphism: ( $i * $i * $i ) > $o ).
tff(decl_56,type,
inductive: $i > $o ).
tff(decl_57,type,
member: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).
tff(decl_58,type,
one_to_one: $i > $o ).
tff(decl_59,type,
operation: $i > $o ).
tff(decl_60,type,
single_valued_class: $i > $o ).
tff(decl_61,type,
subclass: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).
tff(decl_62,type,
universal_class: $i ).
tff(decl_63,type,
element_relation: $i ).
tff(decl_64,type,
null_class: $i ).
tff(decl_65,type,
successor_relation: $i ).
tff(decl_66,type,
omega: $i ).
tff(decl_67,type,
identity_relation: $i ).
tff(decl_68,type,
choice: $i ).
tff(decl_69,type,
subset_relation: $i ).
tff(decl_70,type,
x: $i ).
cnf(subclass_implies_equal,axiom,
( equalish(X1,X2)
| ~ subclass(X1,X2)
| ~ subclass(X2,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',subclass_implies_equal) ).
cnf(subclass_is_reflexive,axiom,
subclass(X1,X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',subclass_is_reflexive) ).
cnf(prove_reflexivity,negated_conjecture,
~ equalish(x,x),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_reflexivity) ).
cnf(c_0_3,axiom,
( equalish(X1,X2)
| ~ subclass(X1,X2)
| ~ subclass(X2,X1) ),
subclass_implies_equal ).
cnf(c_0_4,axiom,
subclass(X1,X1),
subclass_is_reflexive ).
cnf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
~ equalish(x,x),
prove_reflexivity ).
cnf(c_0_6,plain,
equalish(X1,X1),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3,c_0_4]),c_0_4])]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.14 % Problem : SET055-7 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.00/0.14 % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.15/0.35 % Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.15/0.35 % DateTime : Sat Aug 26 08:57:25 EDT 2023
% 0.15/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.58 start to proof: theBenchmark
% 0.20/0.61 % Version : CSE_E---1.5
% 0.20/0.61 % Problem : theBenchmark.p
% 0.20/0.61 % Proof found
% 0.20/0.61 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 0.20/0.61 % SZS output start Proof
% See solution above
% 0.20/0.62 % Total time : 0.021000 s
% 0.20/0.62 % SZS output end Proof
% 0.20/0.62 % Total time : 0.026000 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------