TSTP Solution File: SET055-6 by E---3.1.00
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1.00
% Problem : SET055-6 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sat May 4 09:17:38 EDT 2024
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.22s 0.54s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.22s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 14 ( 6 unt; 2 nHn; 10 RR)
% Number of literals : 25 ( 0 equ; 12 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 2 ( 2 usr; 1 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 18 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(not_subclass_members2,axiom,
( subclass(X1,X2)
| ~ member(not_subclass_element(X1,X2),X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.jrIcJ4ULMz/E---3.1_8488.p',not_subclass_members2) ).
cnf(subclass_implies_equal,axiom,
( equalish(X1,X2)
| ~ subclass(X1,X2)
| ~ subclass(X2,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.jrIcJ4ULMz/E---3.1_8488.p',subclass_implies_equal) ).
cnf(not_subclass_members1,axiom,
( member(not_subclass_element(X1,X2),X1)
| subclass(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.jrIcJ4ULMz/E---3.1_8488.p',not_subclass_members1) ).
cnf(prove_reflexivity,negated_conjecture,
~ equalish(x,x),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.jrIcJ4ULMz/E---3.1_8488.p',prove_reflexivity) ).
cnf(c_0_4,plain,
( subclass(X1,X2)
| ~ member(not_subclass_element(X1,X2),X2) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[not_subclass_members2]) ).
cnf(c_0_5,plain,
( equalish(X1,X2)
| ~ subclass(X1,X2)
| ~ subclass(X2,X1) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[subclass_implies_equal]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,plain,
( subclass(X1,X2)
| ~ member(not_subclass_element(X1,X2),X2) ),
c_0_4 ).
cnf(c_0_7,axiom,
( member(not_subclass_element(X1,X2),X1)
| subclass(X1,X2) ),
not_subclass_members1 ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
~ equalish(x,x),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[prove_reflexivity]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
( equalish(X1,X2)
| ~ subclass(X1,X2)
| ~ subclass(X2,X1) ),
c_0_5 ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
subclass(X1,X1),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
~ equalish(x,x),
c_0_8 ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
equalish(X1,X1),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]),c_0_10])]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.14 % Problem : SET055-6 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.07/0.15 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.15/0.36 % Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.36 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.36 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.36 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.15/0.36 % DateTime : Fri May 3 10:20:11 EDT 2024
% 0.15/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.22/0.51 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.22/0.51 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.jrIcJ4ULMz/E---3.1_8488.p
% 0.22/0.54 # Version: 3.1.0
% 0.22/0.54 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.22/0.54 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.22/0.54 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.22/0.54 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.54 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.54 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.54 # C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with pid 8606 completed with status 0
% 0.22/0.54 # Result found by C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr
% 0.22/0.54 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.22/0.54 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.22/0.54 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.22/0.54 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.22/0.54 # Search class: FGHNM-FFLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.22/0.54 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.22/0.54 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 811s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.54 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 151s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.54 # Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.54 # Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.54 # Starting sh5l with 136s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.54 # C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with pid 8616 completed with status 0
% 0.22/0.54 # Result found by C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr
% 0.22/0.54 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.22/0.54 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.22/0.54 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.22/0.54 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.22/0.54 # Search class: FGHNM-FFLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.22/0.54 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.22/0.54 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 811s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.54 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 151s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.54 # Preprocessing time : 0.003 s
% 0.22/0.54 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.22/0.54
% 0.22/0.54 # Proof found!
% 0.22/0.54 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.22/0.54 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.22/0.54 # Parsed axioms : 159
% 0.22/0.54 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.22/0.54 # Initial clauses : 159
% 0.22/0.54 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.22/0.54 # Initial clauses in saturation : 159
% 0.22/0.54 # Processed clauses : 278
% 0.22/0.54 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.22/0.54 # ...subsumed : 3
% 0.22/0.54 # ...remaining for further processing : 275
% 0.22/0.54 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.22/0.54 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.22/0.54 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.22/0.54 # Backward-rewritten : 4
% 0.22/0.54 # Generated clauses : 392
% 0.22/0.54 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 337
% 0.22/0.54 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.22/0.54 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.22/0.54 # Paramodulations : 392
% 0.22/0.54 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.22/0.54 # NegExts : 0
% 0.22/0.54 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.22/0.54 # Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.22/0.54 # Total rewrite steps : 23
% 0.22/0.54 # ...of those cached : 9
% 0.22/0.54 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.22/0.54 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.22/0.54 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.22/0.54 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.22/0.54 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.22/0.54 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.22/0.54 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.22/0.54 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.22/0.54 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.22/0.54 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.22/0.54 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.22/0.54 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.22/0.54 # Current number of processed clauses : 112
% 0.22/0.54 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 25
% 0.22/0.54 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.22/0.54 # Negative unit clauses : 0
% 0.22/0.54 # Non-unit-clauses : 87
% 0.22/0.54 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 377
% 0.22/0.54 # ...number of literals in the above : 930
% 0.22/0.54 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.22/0.54 # Current number of archived clauses : 163
% 0.22/0.54 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 4160
% 0.22/0.54 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 3483
% 0.22/0.54 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 3
% 0.22/0.54 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 59
% 0.22/0.54 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.22/0.54 # BW rewrite match attempts : 56
% 0.22/0.54 # BW rewrite match successes : 4
% 0.22/0.54 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.22/0.54 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.22/0.54 # Termbank termtop insertions : 9449
% 0.22/0.54 # Search garbage collected termcells : 257
% 0.22/0.54
% 0.22/0.54 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.22/0.54 # User time : 0.015 s
% 0.22/0.54 # System time : 0.006 s
% 0.22/0.54 # Total time : 0.022 s
% 0.22/0.54 # Maximum resident set size: 2028 pages
% 0.22/0.54
% 0.22/0.54 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.22/0.54 # User time : 0.081 s
% 0.22/0.54 # System time : 0.013 s
% 0.22/0.54 # Total time : 0.094 s
% 0.22/0.54 # Maximum resident set size: 1832 pages
% 0.22/0.54 % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.22/0.54 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------