TSTP Solution File: SET027+1 by SuperZenon---0.0.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SuperZenon---0.0.1
% Problem : SET027+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v5.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_super_zenon -p0 -itptp -om -max-time %d %s
% Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 05:38:18 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 1.52s 1.74s
% Output : Proof 1.52s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.10 % Problem : SET027+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v5.4.0.
% 0.11/0.11 % Command : run_super_zenon -p0 -itptp -om -max-time %d %s
% 0.11/0.32 % Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.32 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.32 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.32 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.32 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.32 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.32 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.11/0.32 % DateTime : Sun Jul 10 20:05:22 EDT 2022
% 0.11/0.32 % CPUTime :
% 1.52/1.74 % SZS status Theorem
% 1.52/1.74 (* PROOF-FOUND *)
% 1.52/1.74 (* BEGIN-PROOF *)
% 1.52/1.74 % SZS output start Proof
% 1.52/1.74 1. (member T_0 T_1) (-. (member T_0 T_1)) ### Axiom
% 1.52/1.74 2. (-. (member T_0 T_2)) (member T_0 T_2) ### Axiom
% 1.52/1.74 3. ((member T_0 T_1) => (member T_0 T_2)) (-. (member T_0 T_2)) (member T_0 T_1) ### Imply 1 2
% 1.52/1.74 4. (All U, ((member U T_1) => (member U T_2))) (member T_0 T_1) (-. (member T_0 T_2)) ### All 3
% 1.52/1.74 5. (-. (member T_0 T_3)) (member T_0 T_3) ### Axiom
% 1.52/1.74 6. ((member T_0 T_2) => (member T_0 T_3)) (-. (member T_0 T_3)) (member T_0 T_1) (All U, ((member U T_1) => (member U T_2))) ### Imply 4 5
% 1.52/1.74 7. (All U, ((member U T_2) => (member U T_3))) (All U, ((member U T_1) => (member U T_2))) (member T_0 T_1) (-. (member T_0 T_3)) ### All 6
% 1.52/1.74 8. (-. ((member T_0 T_1) => (member T_0 T_3))) (All U, ((member U T_1) => (member U T_2))) (All U, ((member U T_2) => (member U T_3))) ### NotImply 7
% 1.52/1.74 9. (-. (All U, ((member U T_1) => (member U T_3)))) (All U, ((member U T_2) => (member U T_3))) (All U, ((member U T_1) => (member U T_2))) ### NotAllEx 8
% 1.52/1.74 10. (-. (subclass T_1 T_3)) (All U, ((member U T_1) => (member U T_2))) (All U, ((member U T_2) => (member U T_3))) ### Definition-Pseudo(subclass) 9
% 1.52/1.74 11. (subclass T_2 T_3) (All U, ((member U T_1) => (member U T_2))) (-. (subclass T_1 T_3)) ### Definition-Pseudo(subclass) 10
% 1.52/1.74 12. (subclass T_1 T_2) (-. (subclass T_1 T_3)) (subclass T_2 T_3) ### Definition-Pseudo(subclass) 11
% 1.52/1.74 13. (-. (((subclass T_1 T_2) /\ (subclass T_2 T_3)) => (subclass T_1 T_3))) ### ConjTree 12
% 1.52/1.74 14. (-. (All Z, (((subclass T_1 T_2) /\ (subclass T_2 Z)) => (subclass T_1 Z)))) ### NotAllEx 13
% 1.52/1.74 15. (-. (All Y, (All Z, (((subclass T_1 Y) /\ (subclass Y Z)) => (subclass T_1 Z))))) ### NotAllEx 14
% 1.52/1.74 16. (-. (All X, (All Y, (All Z, (((subclass X Y) /\ (subclass Y Z)) => (subclass X Z)))))) ### NotAllEx 15
% 1.52/1.74 % SZS output end Proof
% 1.52/1.74 (* END-PROOF *)
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------