TSTP Solution File: SET024+1 by Vampire---4.8
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Vampire---4.8
% Problem : SET024+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Bugfixed v5.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 21 03:07:54 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 0.57s 0.73s
% Output : Refutation 0.57s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 7
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 18 ( 7 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 48 ( 15 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 8 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 49 ( 19 ~; 13 |; 12 &)
% ( 2 <=>; 3 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 9 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 4 ( 4 usr; 2 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 23 ( 21 !; 2 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f229,plain,
$false,
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f228,f118]) ).
fof(f118,plain,
member(sK0,universal_class),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f77]) ).
fof(f77,plain,
( ~ member(sK0,singleton(sK0))
& member(sK0,universal_class) ),
inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0])],[f66,f76]) ).
fof(f76,plain,
( ? [X0] :
( ~ member(X0,singleton(X0))
& member(X0,universal_class) )
=> ( ~ member(sK0,singleton(sK0))
& member(sK0,universal_class) ) ),
introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).
fof(f66,plain,
? [X0] :
( ~ member(X0,singleton(X0))
& member(X0,universal_class) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f45]) ).
fof(f45,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X0] :
( member(X0,universal_class)
=> member(X0,singleton(X0)) ),
inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f44]) ).
fof(f44,conjecture,
! [X0] :
( member(X0,universal_class)
=> member(X0,singleton(X0)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',set_in_its_singleton) ).
fof(f228,plain,
~ member(sK0,universal_class),
inference(resolution,[],[f219,f194]) ).
fof(f194,plain,
~ member(sK0,unordered_pair(sK0,sK0)),
inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f119,f129]) ).
fof(f129,plain,
! [X0] : singleton(X0) = unordered_pair(X0,X0),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f6]) ).
fof(f6,axiom,
! [X0] : singleton(X0) = unordered_pair(X0,X0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',singleton_set_defn) ).
fof(f119,plain,
~ member(sK0,singleton(sK0)),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f77]) ).
fof(f219,plain,
! [X2,X1] :
( member(X2,unordered_pair(X1,X2))
| ~ member(X2,universal_class) ),
inference(equality_resolution,[],[f166]) ).
fof(f166,plain,
! [X2,X0,X1] :
( member(X0,unordered_pair(X1,X2))
| X0 != X2
| ~ member(X0,universal_class) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f101]) ).
fof(f101,plain,
! [X0,X1,X2] :
( ( member(X0,unordered_pair(X1,X2))
| ( X0 != X2
& X0 != X1 )
| ~ member(X0,universal_class) )
& ( ( ( X0 = X2
| X0 = X1 )
& member(X0,universal_class) )
| ~ member(X0,unordered_pair(X1,X2)) ) ),
inference(flattening,[],[f100]) ).
fof(f100,plain,
! [X0,X1,X2] :
( ( member(X0,unordered_pair(X1,X2))
| ( X0 != X2
& X0 != X1 )
| ~ member(X0,universal_class) )
& ( ( ( X0 = X2
| X0 = X1 )
& member(X0,universal_class) )
| ~ member(X0,unordered_pair(X1,X2)) ) ),
inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f61]) ).
fof(f61,plain,
! [X0,X1,X2] :
( member(X0,unordered_pair(X1,X2))
<=> ( ( X0 = X2
| X0 = X1 )
& member(X0,universal_class) ) ),
inference(rectify,[],[f4]) ).
fof(f4,axiom,
! [X2,X0,X1] :
( member(X2,unordered_pair(X0,X1))
<=> ( ( X1 = X2
| X0 = X2 )
& member(X2,universal_class) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',unordered_pair_defn) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : SET024+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Bugfixed v5.4.0.
% 0.03/0.13 % Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Mon May 20 12:04:37 EDT 2024
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.13/0.34 This is a FOF_THM_RFO_SEQ problem
% 0.13/0.35 Running vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.51/0.72 % (1951)lrs+1002_1:16_to=lpo:sil=32000:sp=unary_frequency:sos=on:i=45:bd=off:ss=axioms_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/45Mi)
% 0.51/0.72 % (1951)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy% (1951)------------------------------
% 0.51/0.72 % (1951)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.51/0.72 % (1951)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.51/0.72
% 0.51/0.72 % (1951)Memory used [KB]: 1042
% 0.51/0.72 % (1951)Time elapsed: 0.002 s
% 0.51/0.72 % (1951)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.51/0.72 % (1951)------------------------------
% 0.51/0.72 % (1951)------------------------------
% 0.51/0.72 % (1946)dis-1011_2:1_sil=2000:lsd=20:nwc=5.0:flr=on:mep=off:st=3.0:i=34:sd=1:ep=RS:ss=axioms_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/34Mi)
% 0.51/0.72 % (1948)lrs+1011_1:1_sil=8000:sp=occurrence:nwc=10.0:i=78:ss=axioms:sgt=8_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/78Mi)
% 0.51/0.72 % (1947)lrs+1011_461:32768_sil=16000:irw=on:sp=frequency:lsd=20:fd=preordered:nwc=10.0:s2agt=32:alpa=false:cond=fast:s2a=on:i=51:s2at=3.0:awrs=decay:awrsf=691:bd=off:nm=20:fsr=off:amm=sco:uhcvi=on:rawr=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/51Mi)
% 0.51/0.72 % (1953)lrs-21_1:1_to=lpo:sil=2000:sp=frequency:sos=on:lma=on:i=56:sd=2:ss=axioms:ep=R_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/56Mi)
% 0.51/0.73 % (1953)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy% (1953)------------------------------
% 0.51/0.73 % (1953)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.51/0.73 % (1953)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.51/0.73
% 0.51/0.73 % (1953)Memory used [KB]: 1042
% 0.51/0.73 % (1953)Time elapsed: 0.001 s
% 0.51/0.73 % (1953)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.51/0.73 % (1946)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy% (1946)------------------------------
% 0.51/0.73 % (1946)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.51/0.73 % (1946)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.51/0.73
% 0.51/0.73 % (1946)Memory used [KB]: 1074
% 0.51/0.73 % (1946)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 0.51/0.73 % (1946)Instructions burned: 5 (million)
% 0.51/0.73 % (1954)lrs+21_1:16_sil=2000:sp=occurrence:urr=on:flr=on:i=55:sd=1:nm=0:ins=3:ss=included:rawr=on:br=off_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/55Mi)
% 0.51/0.73 % (1953)------------------------------
% 0.51/0.73 % (1953)------------------------------
% 0.51/0.73 % (1946)------------------------------
% 0.51/0.73 % (1946)------------------------------
% 0.51/0.73 % (1954)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy% (1954)------------------------------
% 0.51/0.73 % (1954)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.51/0.73 % (1954)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.51/0.73
% 0.51/0.73 % (1954)Memory used [KB]: 1042
% 0.51/0.73 % (1954)Time elapsed: 0.002 s
% 0.51/0.73 % (1954)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.51/0.73 % (1954)------------------------------
% 0.51/0.73 % (1954)------------------------------
% 0.57/0.73 % (1948)First to succeed.
% 0.57/0.73 % (1948)Solution written to "/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/vampire-proof-1945"
% 0.57/0.73 % (1956)lrs+1010_1:2_sil=4000:tgt=ground:nwc=10.0:st=2.0:i=208:sd=1:bd=off:ss=axioms_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/208Mi)
% 0.57/0.73 % (1948)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.57/0.73 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.57/0.73 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.57/0.73 % (1948)------------------------------
% 0.57/0.73 % (1948)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.57/0.73 % (1948)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.57/0.73
% 0.57/0.73 % (1948)Memory used [KB]: 1167
% 0.57/0.73 % (1948)Time elapsed: 0.006 s
% 0.57/0.73 % (1948)Instructions burned: 9 (million)
% 0.57/0.73 % (1945)Success in time 0.376 s
% 0.57/0.73 % Vampire---4.8 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------