TSTP Solution File: SET020-7 by E-SAT---3.1.00

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E-SAT---3.1.00
% Problem  : SET020-7 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sat May  4 09:21:38 EDT 2024

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.20s 0.52s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.20s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   19 (   8 unt;   0 nHn;  19 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   33 (  15 equ;  17 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   37 (  24 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cartesian_product4,axiom,
    ( ordered_pair(first(X1),second(X1)) = X1
    | ~ member(X1,cross_product(X2,X3)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.snp9TXBsLv/E---3.1_8343.p',cartesian_product4) ).

cnf(corollary_1_to_cartesian_product,axiom,
    ( member(X1,universal_class)
    | ~ member(ordered_pair(X1,X2),cross_product(X3,X4)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.snp9TXBsLv/E---3.1_8343.p',corollary_1_to_cartesian_product) ).

cnf(prove_unique_1st_and_2nd_in_pair_of_sets1_1,negated_conjecture,
    member(ordered_pair(u,v),cross_product(universal_class,universal_class)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.snp9TXBsLv/E---3.1_8343.p',prove_unique_1st_and_2nd_in_pair_of_sets1_1) ).

cnf(ordered_pair_determines_components1,axiom,
    ( X1 = X3
    | ordered_pair(X1,X2) != ordered_pair(X3,X4)
    | ~ member(X1,universal_class) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.snp9TXBsLv/E---3.1_8343.p',ordered_pair_determines_components1) ).

cnf(prove_unique_1st_and_2nd_in_pair_of_sets1_2,negated_conjecture,
    first(ordered_pair(u,v)) != u,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.snp9TXBsLv/E---3.1_8343.p',prove_unique_1st_and_2nd_in_pair_of_sets1_2) ).

cnf(c_0_5,plain,
    ( ordered_pair(first(X1),second(X1)) = X1
    | ~ member(X1,cross_product(X2,X3)) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cartesian_product4]) ).

cnf(c_0_6,plain,
    ( member(X1,universal_class)
    | ~ member(ordered_pair(X1,X2),cross_product(X3,X4)) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[corollary_1_to_cartesian_product]) ).

cnf(c_0_7,plain,
    ( ordered_pair(first(X1),second(X1)) = X1
    | ~ member(X1,cross_product(X2,X3)) ),
    c_0_5 ).

cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
    member(ordered_pair(u,v),cross_product(universal_class,universal_class)),
    prove_unique_1st_and_2nd_in_pair_of_sets1_1 ).

cnf(c_0_9,plain,
    ( member(X1,universal_class)
    | ~ member(ordered_pair(X1,X2),cross_product(X3,X4)) ),
    c_0_6 ).

cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
    ordered_pair(first(ordered_pair(u,v)),second(ordered_pair(u,v))) = ordered_pair(u,v),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    ( X1 = X3
    | ordered_pair(X1,X2) != ordered_pair(X3,X4)
    | ~ member(X1,universal_class) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[ordered_pair_determines_components1]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
    ( member(first(ordered_pair(u,v)),universal_class)
    | ~ member(ordered_pair(u,v),cross_product(X1,X2)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    ( X1 = X3
    | ordered_pair(X1,X2) != ordered_pair(X3,X4)
    | ~ member(X1,universal_class) ),
    c_0_11 ).

cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
    member(first(ordered_pair(u,v)),universal_class),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
    first(ordered_pair(u,v)) != u,
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[prove_unique_1st_and_2nd_in_pair_of_sets1_2]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
    ( first(ordered_pair(u,v)) = X1
    | ordered_pair(u,v) != ordered_pair(X1,X2) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_10]),c_0_14])]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
    first(ordered_pair(u,v)) != u,
    c_0_15 ).

cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_16]),c_0_17]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem    : SET020-7 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% 0.13/0.13  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime   : Fri May  3 10:01:20 EDT 2024
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.20/0.48  Running first-order model finding
% 0.20/0.48  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.snp9TXBsLv/E---3.1_8343.p
% 0.20/0.52  # Version: 3.1.0
% 0.20/0.52  # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.52  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.52  # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/0.52  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.52  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.52  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.52  # new_bool_3 with pid 8490 completed with status 0
% 0.20/0.52  # Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.20/0.52  # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.52  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.52  # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/0.52  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.52  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.20/0.52  # Search class: FGHSM-FFMS21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.20/0.52  # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.20/0.52  # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.52  # SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with pid 8494 completed with status 0
% 0.20/0.52  # Result found by SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG
% 0.20/0.52  # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.52  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.52  # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/0.52  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.52  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.20/0.52  # Search class: FGHSM-FFMS21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.20/0.52  # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.20/0.52  # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.52  # Preprocessing time       : 0.003 s
% 0.20/0.52  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.20/0.52  
% 0.20/0.52  # Proof found!
% 0.20/0.52  # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.20/0.52  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.20/0.52  # Parsed axioms                        : 159
% 0.20/0.52  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 95
% 0.20/0.52  # Initial clauses                      : 64
% 0.20/0.52  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.20/0.52  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 64
% 0.20/0.52  # Processed clauses                    : 247
% 0.20/0.52  # ...of these trivial                  : 2
% 0.20/0.52  # ...subsumed                          : 73
% 0.20/0.52  # ...remaining for further processing  : 172
% 0.20/0.52  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 12
% 0.20/0.52  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.20/0.52  # Backward-subsumed                    : 6
% 0.20/0.52  # Backward-rewritten                   : 2
% 0.20/0.52  # Generated clauses                    : 700
% 0.20/0.52  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 525
% 0.20/0.52  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.20/0.52  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.20/0.52  # Paramodulations                      : 684
% 0.20/0.52  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.20/0.52  # NegExts                              : 0
% 0.20/0.52  # Equation resolutions                 : 16
% 0.20/0.52  # Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.20/0.52  # Total rewrite steps                  : 196
% 0.20/0.52  # ...of those cached                   : 154
% 0.20/0.52  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.20/0.52  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.20/0.52  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.20/0.52  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.20/0.52  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.20/0.52  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.20/0.52  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.20/0.52  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.20/0.52  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.20/0.52  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.20/0.52  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.20/0.52  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.20/0.52  # Current number of processed clauses  : 101
% 0.20/0.52  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 24
% 0.20/0.52  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 2
% 0.20/0.52  #    Negative unit clauses             : 6
% 0.20/0.52  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 69
% 0.20/0.52  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 393
% 0.20/0.52  # ...number of literals in the above   : 1105
% 0.20/0.52  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.20/0.52  # Current number of archived clauses   : 69
% 0.20/0.52  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 522
% 0.20/0.52  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 458
% 0.20/0.52  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 60
% 0.20/0.52  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 23
% 0.20/0.52  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.20/0.52  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 31
% 0.20/0.52  # BW rewrite match successes           : 23
% 0.20/0.52  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.20/0.52  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.20/0.52  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 9167
% 0.20/0.52  # Search garbage collected termcells   : 517
% 0.20/0.52  
% 0.20/0.52  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.52  # User time                : 0.021 s
% 0.20/0.52  # System time              : 0.002 s
% 0.20/0.52  # Total time               : 0.023 s
% 0.20/0.52  # Maximum resident set size: 1864 pages
% 0.20/0.52  
% 0.20/0.52  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.52  # User time                : 0.025 s
% 0.20/0.52  # System time              : 0.004 s
% 0.20/0.52  # Total time               : 0.029 s
% 0.20/0.52  # Maximum resident set size: 1812 pages
% 0.20/0.52  % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------