TSTP Solution File: SET018-7 by E-SAT---3.1.00
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.1.00
% Problem : SET018-7 : TPTP v8.2.0. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 21 02:56:58 EDT 2024
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.18s 0.48s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.18s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 12 ( 8 unt; 0 nHn; 12 RR)
% Number of literals : 19 ( 13 equ; 10 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 6 ( 6 usr; 5 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 14 ( 7 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(ordered_pair_determines_components2,axiom,
( X2 = X4
| ordered_pair(X1,X2) != ordered_pair(X3,X4)
| ~ member(X2,universal_class) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ordered_pair_determines_components2) ).
cnf(prove_ordered_pair_determines_components2_1,negated_conjecture,
ordered_pair(w,x) = ordered_pair(y,z),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_ordered_pair_determines_components2_1) ).
cnf(prove_ordered_pair_determines_components2_2,negated_conjecture,
member(x,universal_class),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_ordered_pair_determines_components2_2) ).
cnf(prove_ordered_pair_determines_components2_3,negated_conjecture,
x != z,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_ordered_pair_determines_components2_3) ).
cnf(c_0_4,plain,
( X2 = X4
| ordered_pair(X1,X2) != ordered_pair(X3,X4)
| ~ member(X2,universal_class) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[ordered_pair_determines_components2]) ).
cnf(c_0_5,plain,
( X2 = X4
| ordered_pair(X1,X2) != ordered_pair(X3,X4)
| ~ member(X2,universal_class) ),
c_0_4 ).
cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
ordered_pair(w,x) = ordered_pair(y,z),
prove_ordered_pair_determines_components2_1 ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
member(x,universal_class),
prove_ordered_pair_determines_components2_2 ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
x != z,
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[prove_ordered_pair_determines_components2_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
( x = X1
| ordered_pair(y,z) != ordered_pair(X2,X1) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6]),c_0_7])]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
x != z,
c_0_8 ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]),c_0_10]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.10/0.11 % Problem : SET018-7 : TPTP v8.2.0. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% 0.10/0.12 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.11/0.34 % Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.11/0.34 % DateTime : Mon May 20 12:18:53 EDT 2024
% 0.11/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.18/0.46 Running first-order model finding
% 0.18/0.46 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.18/0.48 # Version: 3.1.0
% 0.18/0.48 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.18/0.48 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.18/0.48 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.18/0.48 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.48 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.48 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.48 # new_bool_3 with pid 9793 completed with status 0
% 0.18/0.48 # Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.18/0.48 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.18/0.48 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.18/0.48 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.18/0.48 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.48 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.18/0.48 # Search class: FGHSM-FFMS21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.18/0.48 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.18/0.48 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.48 # SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with pid 9796 completed with status 0
% 0.18/0.48 # Result found by SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG
% 0.18/0.48 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.18/0.48 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.18/0.48 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.18/0.48 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.48 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.18/0.48 # Search class: FGHSM-FFMS21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.18/0.48 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.18/0.48 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.48 # Preprocessing time : 0.002 s
% 0.18/0.48 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.18/0.48
% 0.18/0.48 # Proof found!
% 0.18/0.48 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.18/0.48 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.18/0.48 # Parsed axioms : 170
% 0.18/0.48 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 110
% 0.18/0.48 # Initial clauses : 60
% 0.18/0.48 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.18/0.48 # Initial clauses in saturation : 60
% 0.18/0.48 # Processed clauses : 124
% 0.18/0.48 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.18/0.48 # ...subsumed : 13
% 0.18/0.48 # ...remaining for further processing : 111
% 0.18/0.48 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 2
% 0.18/0.48 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.18/0.48 # Backward-subsumed : 1
% 0.18/0.48 # Backward-rewritten : 2
% 0.18/0.48 # Generated clauses : 131
% 0.18/0.48 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 85
% 0.18/0.48 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.18/0.48 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.18/0.48 # Paramodulations : 125
% 0.18/0.48 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.18/0.48 # NegExts : 0
% 0.18/0.48 # Equation resolutions : 6
% 0.18/0.48 # Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.18/0.48 # Total rewrite steps : 40
% 0.18/0.48 # ...of those cached : 18
% 0.18/0.48 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.18/0.48 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.18/0.48 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.18/0.48 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.18/0.48 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.18/0.48 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.18/0.48 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.18/0.48 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.18/0.48 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.18/0.48 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.18/0.48 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.18/0.48 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.18/0.48 # Current number of processed clauses : 49
% 0.18/0.48 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 15
% 0.18/0.48 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 2
% 0.18/0.48 # Negative unit clauses : 2
% 0.18/0.48 # Non-unit-clauses : 30
% 0.18/0.48 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 77
% 0.18/0.48 # ...number of literals in the above : 177
% 0.18/0.48 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.18/0.48 # Current number of archived clauses : 60
% 0.18/0.48 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 148
% 0.18/0.48 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 127
% 0.18/0.48 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 11
% 0.18/0.48 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.18/0.48 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.18/0.48 # BW rewrite match attempts : 31
% 0.18/0.48 # BW rewrite match successes : 25
% 0.18/0.48 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.18/0.48 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.18/0.48 # Termbank termtop insertions : 3571
% 0.18/0.48 # Search garbage collected termcells : 548
% 0.18/0.48
% 0.18/0.48 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.18/0.48 # User time : 0.009 s
% 0.18/0.48 # System time : 0.001 s
% 0.18/0.48 # Total time : 0.010 s
% 0.18/0.48 # Maximum resident set size: 1864 pages
% 0.18/0.48
% 0.18/0.48 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.18/0.48 # User time : 0.013 s
% 0.18/0.48 # System time : 0.001 s
% 0.18/0.48 # Total time : 0.014 s
% 0.18/0.48 # Maximum resident set size: 1824 pages
% 0.18/0.48 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------